Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Geodesy for a Sustainable Earth |
Editors | Jeffrey T. Freymueller, Laura Sánchez |
Chapter | 145 |
Pages | 313-319 |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISBN (electronic) | 978-3-031-29507-2 |
Publication status | Published - 23 Aug 2022 |
Publication series
Name | International Association of Geodesy Symposia |
---|---|
Volume | 154 |
ISSN (Print) | 0939-9585 |
ISSN (electronic) | 2197-9359 |
Abstract
GNSS frequency transfer (FT) based on precise point positioning delivers instability values down to sub-10 −16 between two modern receivers. In the present study we investigate the technical limits such receivers impose on FT by means of a dedicated experiment at Germany’s national metrology institute (PTB). For this purpose, four geodetic receivers, two of the same type each, were all connected to one single antenna and fed by the highly stable UTC (PTB) frequency signal. Since all error sources affecting the satellite signals are the same for all receivers, they cancel out when forming receiver-to-receiver single differences (SDs). Due to the fact that the remaining SD carrier phase ambiguities can be easily fixed to integer values, only the relative receiver clock error remains in the SDs. We assess the instability of three different receiver combinations, two with the same receiver type (intra-receiver) and one with different types (inter-receiver). The intra-receiver pairs reach lower instability values faster than the inter-receiver combination, which is in part caused by the different signal tracking modes of the receivers. To be specific, the 10 −18 instability range was only reached by the intra-receiver pairs, whereas the inter-receiver combination already hits its noise floor at about 1.5 ⋅ 10 −17. In addition, our analysis of using different observation type combinations only shows small differences regarding the link instability.
Keywords
- Allan deviation, Frequency transfer, GNSS
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Computers in Earth Sciences
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Geophysics
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
Geodesy for a Sustainable Earth. ed. / Jeffrey T. Freymueller; Laura Sánchez. 2022. p. 313-319 (International Association of Geodesy Symposia; Vol. 154).
Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Contribution to book/anthology › Research › peer review
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - On the Limits of State-of-the-Art GNSS Receivers in Frequency Transfer
AU - Krawinkel, Thomas
AU - Schön, Steffen
N1 - Funding Information: This research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – project number 434617780 – SFB 1464.
PY - 2022/8/23
Y1 - 2022/8/23
N2 - GNSS frequency transfer (FT) based on precise point positioning delivers instability values down to sub-10 −16 between two modern receivers. In the present study we investigate the technical limits such receivers impose on FT by means of a dedicated experiment at Germany’s national metrology institute (PTB). For this purpose, four geodetic receivers, two of the same type each, were all connected to one single antenna and fed by the highly stable UTC (PTB) frequency signal. Since all error sources affecting the satellite signals are the same for all receivers, they cancel out when forming receiver-to-receiver single differences (SDs). Due to the fact that the remaining SD carrier phase ambiguities can be easily fixed to integer values, only the relative receiver clock error remains in the SDs. We assess the instability of three different receiver combinations, two with the same receiver type (intra-receiver) and one with different types (inter-receiver). The intra-receiver pairs reach lower instability values faster than the inter-receiver combination, which is in part caused by the different signal tracking modes of the receivers. To be specific, the 10 −18 instability range was only reached by the intra-receiver pairs, whereas the inter-receiver combination already hits its noise floor at about 1.5 ⋅ 10 −17. In addition, our analysis of using different observation type combinations only shows small differences regarding the link instability.
AB - GNSS frequency transfer (FT) based on precise point positioning delivers instability values down to sub-10 −16 between two modern receivers. In the present study we investigate the technical limits such receivers impose on FT by means of a dedicated experiment at Germany’s national metrology institute (PTB). For this purpose, four geodetic receivers, two of the same type each, were all connected to one single antenna and fed by the highly stable UTC (PTB) frequency signal. Since all error sources affecting the satellite signals are the same for all receivers, they cancel out when forming receiver-to-receiver single differences (SDs). Due to the fact that the remaining SD carrier phase ambiguities can be easily fixed to integer values, only the relative receiver clock error remains in the SDs. We assess the instability of three different receiver combinations, two with the same receiver type (intra-receiver) and one with different types (inter-receiver). The intra-receiver pairs reach lower instability values faster than the inter-receiver combination, which is in part caused by the different signal tracking modes of the receivers. To be specific, the 10 −18 instability range was only reached by the intra-receiver pairs, whereas the inter-receiver combination already hits its noise floor at about 1.5 ⋅ 10 −17. In addition, our analysis of using different observation type combinations only shows small differences regarding the link instability.
KW - Allan deviation
KW - Frequency transfer
KW - GNSS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172691400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/1345_2022_145
DO - 10.1007/1345_2022_145
M3 - Contribution to book/anthology
SN - 978-3-031-29506-5
T3 - International Association of Geodesy Symposia
SP - 313
EP - 319
BT - Geodesy for a Sustainable Earth
A2 - Freymueller, Jeffrey T.
A2 - Sánchez, Laura
ER -