On radical solutions in the philosophy of biology: What does “individuals thinking” actually solve?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3389-3411
Number of pages23
JournalSYNTHESE
Volume198
Issue number4
Early online date17 Jun 2019
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

Abstract

The philosophy of biology is witnessing an increasing enthusiasm for what can be called “individuals thinking”. Individuals thinking is a perspective on the metaphysics of biological entities according to which conceiving of them as individuals rather than kinds enables us to expose ongoing metaphysical debates as focusing on the wrong question, and to achieve better accounts of the metaphysics of biological entities. In this paper, I examine two cases of individuals thinking, the claim that species are individuals and the claim that life on Earth is an individual. I argue that these claims fail to do the metaphysical work that one would want them to do. I highlight problems with the specific claims as well as with the general notion of ‘individual’, and argue that naturalistic metaphysicians of biology should think of the metaphysical status of theoretical entities, such as species and life, as fundamentally theory-dependent. This implies a metaphysical pluralism, that allows that in some theories species, life, and other such entities may feature as individuals, whereas in others they may feature as kinds.

Keywords

    Biological individuality, Definition of life, Life, Metaphysics of biology, Natural kinds, Species problem

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

On radical solutions in the philosophy of biology: What does “individuals thinking” actually solve? / Reydon, Thomas A.C.
In: SYNTHESE, Vol. 198, No. 4, 04.2021, p. 3389-3411.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Reydon TAC. On radical solutions in the philosophy of biology: What does “individuals thinking” actually solve? SYNTHESE. 2021 Apr;198(4):3389-3411. Epub 2019 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s11229-019-02285-8
Download
@article{110953a6270f437cb40ee7d34b916495,
title = "On radical solutions in the philosophy of biology: What does “individuals thinking” actually solve?",
abstract = "The philosophy of biology is witnessing an increasing enthusiasm for what can be called “individuals thinking”. Individuals thinking is a perspective on the metaphysics of biological entities according to which conceiving of them as individuals rather than kinds enables us to expose ongoing metaphysical debates as focusing on the wrong question, and to achieve better accounts of the metaphysics of biological entities. In this paper, I examine two cases of individuals thinking, the claim that species are individuals and the claim that life on Earth is an individual. I argue that these claims fail to do the metaphysical work that one would want them to do. I highlight problems with the specific claims as well as with the general notion of {\textquoteleft}individual{\textquoteright}, and argue that naturalistic metaphysicians of biology should think of the metaphysical status of theoretical entities, such as species and life, as fundamentally theory-dependent. This implies a metaphysical pluralism, that allows that in some theories species, life, and other such entities may feature as individuals, whereas in others they may feature as kinds.",
keywords = "Biological individuality, Definition of life, Life, Metaphysics of biology, Natural kinds, Species problem",
author = "Reydon, {Thomas A.C.}",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1007/s11229-019-02285-8",
language = "English",
volume = "198",
pages = "3389--3411",
journal = "SYNTHESE",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - On radical solutions in the philosophy of biology

T2 - What does “individuals thinking” actually solve?

AU - Reydon, Thomas A.C.

PY - 2021/4

Y1 - 2021/4

N2 - The philosophy of biology is witnessing an increasing enthusiasm for what can be called “individuals thinking”. Individuals thinking is a perspective on the metaphysics of biological entities according to which conceiving of them as individuals rather than kinds enables us to expose ongoing metaphysical debates as focusing on the wrong question, and to achieve better accounts of the metaphysics of biological entities. In this paper, I examine two cases of individuals thinking, the claim that species are individuals and the claim that life on Earth is an individual. I argue that these claims fail to do the metaphysical work that one would want them to do. I highlight problems with the specific claims as well as with the general notion of ‘individual’, and argue that naturalistic metaphysicians of biology should think of the metaphysical status of theoretical entities, such as species and life, as fundamentally theory-dependent. This implies a metaphysical pluralism, that allows that in some theories species, life, and other such entities may feature as individuals, whereas in others they may feature as kinds.

AB - The philosophy of biology is witnessing an increasing enthusiasm for what can be called “individuals thinking”. Individuals thinking is a perspective on the metaphysics of biological entities according to which conceiving of them as individuals rather than kinds enables us to expose ongoing metaphysical debates as focusing on the wrong question, and to achieve better accounts of the metaphysics of biological entities. In this paper, I examine two cases of individuals thinking, the claim that species are individuals and the claim that life on Earth is an individual. I argue that these claims fail to do the metaphysical work that one would want them to do. I highlight problems with the specific claims as well as with the general notion of ‘individual’, and argue that naturalistic metaphysicians of biology should think of the metaphysical status of theoretical entities, such as species and life, as fundamentally theory-dependent. This implies a metaphysical pluralism, that allows that in some theories species, life, and other such entities may feature as individuals, whereas in others they may feature as kinds.

KW - Biological individuality

KW - Definition of life

KW - Life

KW - Metaphysics of biology

KW - Natural kinds

KW - Species problem

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067816880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-019-02285-8

DO - 10.1007/s11229-019-02285-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067816880

VL - 198

SP - 3389

EP - 3411

JO - SYNTHESE

JF - SYNTHESE

SN - 0039-7857

IS - 4

ER -

By the same author(s)