Ökonomische Bewertung ambulanter Arztkontakte von COPD-Patienten in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Allgemeinmedizinern und Pneumologen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • D. Bowles
  • J. M. Graf Von Der Schulenburg

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Bielefeld University
View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionEconomic valuation of physician contacts in German outpatient care of COPD: Results from a survey of general practitioners and respiratory specialists
Original languageMultiple languages
Pages (from-to)379-387
Number of pages9
JournalPneumologie
Volume65
Issue number6
Early online date2 Mar 2011
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and features a substantial economic burden. Methods: This article analyses the frequency of physician contacts and commonly provided services in the outpatient care of patients with COPD in Germany. Information on characteristic health care delivery in case of patients with COPD has been further used to construct basic scenarios of outpatient resource use. Results: Altogether, 34 out of 150 respiratory specialists and 55 out of 350 general practitioners participated in the survey (response rates of 22.7 and 15.7%, respectively). Results point out, that the number of commonly provided services (a) is limited to a very basic set, (b) does not differ substantially according to severity of COPD, and (c) does not substantially vary between the stable phase of the disease and the presence of exacerbations. Conclusions: Despite its low level of evidence, the use of expert opinion can serve as a valuable and legitimate tool; especially when the literature does not provide any or only outdated information.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Ökonomische Bewertung ambulanter Arztkontakte von COPD-Patienten in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Allgemeinmedizinern und Pneumologen. / Bowles, D.; Graf Von Der Schulenburg, J. M.
In: Pneumologie, Vol. 65, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 379-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Bowles D, Graf Von Der Schulenburg JM. Ökonomische Bewertung ambulanter Arztkontakte von COPD-Patienten in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Allgemeinmedizinern und Pneumologen. Pneumologie. 2011 Jun;65(6):379-387. Epub 2011 Mar 2. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256222
Bowles, D. ; Graf Von Der Schulenburg, J. M. / Ökonomische Bewertung ambulanter Arztkontakte von COPD-Patienten in Deutschland : Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Allgemeinmedizinern und Pneumologen. In: Pneumologie. 2011 ; Vol. 65, No. 6. pp. 379-387.
Download
@article{b58e4d6081e0486ea04a279844f180ef,
title = "{\"O}konomische Bewertung ambulanter Arztkontakte von COPD-Patienten in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Allgemeinmedizinern und Pneumologen",
abstract = "Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and features a substantial economic burden. Methods: This article analyses the frequency of physician contacts and commonly provided services in the outpatient care of patients with COPD in Germany. Information on characteristic health care delivery in case of patients with COPD has been further used to construct basic scenarios of outpatient resource use. Results: Altogether, 34 out of 150 respiratory specialists and 55 out of 350 general practitioners participated in the survey (response rates of 22.7 and 15.7%, respectively). Results point out, that the number of commonly provided services (a) is limited to a very basic set, (b) does not differ substantially according to severity of COPD, and (c) does not substantially vary between the stable phase of the disease and the presence of exacerbations. Conclusions: Despite its low level of evidence, the use of expert opinion can serve as a valuable and legitimate tool; especially when the literature does not provide any or only outdated information.",
author = "D. Bowles and {Graf Von Der Schulenburg}, {J. M.}",
year = "2011",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1055/s-0030-1256222",
language = "Multiple languages",
volume = "65",
pages = "379--387",
number = "6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ökonomische Bewertung ambulanter Arztkontakte von COPD-Patienten in Deutschland

T2 - Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Allgemeinmedizinern und Pneumologen

AU - Bowles, D.

AU - Graf Von Der Schulenburg, J. M.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and features a substantial economic burden. Methods: This article analyses the frequency of physician contacts and commonly provided services in the outpatient care of patients with COPD in Germany. Information on characteristic health care delivery in case of patients with COPD has been further used to construct basic scenarios of outpatient resource use. Results: Altogether, 34 out of 150 respiratory specialists and 55 out of 350 general practitioners participated in the survey (response rates of 22.7 and 15.7%, respectively). Results point out, that the number of commonly provided services (a) is limited to a very basic set, (b) does not differ substantially according to severity of COPD, and (c) does not substantially vary between the stable phase of the disease and the presence of exacerbations. Conclusions: Despite its low level of evidence, the use of expert opinion can serve as a valuable and legitimate tool; especially when the literature does not provide any or only outdated information.

AB - Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and features a substantial economic burden. Methods: This article analyses the frequency of physician contacts and commonly provided services in the outpatient care of patients with COPD in Germany. Information on characteristic health care delivery in case of patients with COPD has been further used to construct basic scenarios of outpatient resource use. Results: Altogether, 34 out of 150 respiratory specialists and 55 out of 350 general practitioners participated in the survey (response rates of 22.7 and 15.7%, respectively). Results point out, that the number of commonly provided services (a) is limited to a very basic set, (b) does not differ substantially according to severity of COPD, and (c) does not substantially vary between the stable phase of the disease and the presence of exacerbations. Conclusions: Despite its low level of evidence, the use of expert opinion can serve as a valuable and legitimate tool; especially when the literature does not provide any or only outdated information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958790841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0030-1256222

DO - 10.1055/s-0030-1256222

M3 - Article

C2 - 21370222

AN - SCOPUS:79958790841

VL - 65

SP - 379

EP - 387

JO - Pneumologie

JF - Pneumologie

SN - 0934-8387

IS - 6

ER -