Numerical analysis of LG3,3second harmonic generation in comparison to the LG0,0case

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Joscha Heinze
  • Henning Vahlbruch
  • Benno Willke

External Research Organisations

  • Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35816-35832
Number of pages17
JournalOptics express
Volume28
Issue number24
Publication statusPublished - 10 Nov 2020

Abstract

For coating Brownian thermal noise reduction in future gravitational wave detectors, it is proposed to use light in the helical Laguerre-Gaussian LG3,3 mode instead of the currently used LG0,0 mode. However, the simultaneous reduction of quantum noise would then require the efficient generation of squeezed vacuum states in the LG3,3 mode. Current squeezed light generation techniques employ continuous-wave second harmonic generation (SHG). Here, we simulate the SHG for both modes numerically to derive first insights into the transferability of standard squeezed light generation techniques to the LG3,3 mode. In the first part of this paper, we therefore theoretically discuss SHG in the case of a single undepleted pump mode, which, in general, excites a superposition of harmonic modes. Based on the differential equation for the harmonic field, we derive individual phase matching conditions and hence conversion efficiencies for the excited harmonic modes. In the second part, we analyse the numerical simulations of the LG0,0 and LG3,3 SHG in a single-pass, double-pass and cavity-enhanced configuration under the influence of the focusing, the different pump intensity distributions and the individual phase matching conditions. Our results predict that the LG3,3 mode requires about 14 times the pump power of the LG0,0 mode to achieve the same SHG conversion efficiency in an ideal, realistic cavity design and mainly generates the harmonic LG6,6 mode.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Numerical analysis of LG3,3second harmonic generation in comparison to the LG0,0case. / Heinze, Joscha; Vahlbruch, Henning; Willke, Benno.
In: Optics express, Vol. 28, No. 24, 10.11.2020, p. 35816-35832.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Heinze J, Vahlbruch H, Willke B. Numerical analysis of LG3,3second harmonic generation in comparison to the LG0,0case. Optics express. 2020 Nov 10;28(24):35816-35832. doi: 10.1364/OE.409507
Heinze, Joscha ; Vahlbruch, Henning ; Willke, Benno. / Numerical analysis of LG3,3second harmonic generation in comparison to the LG0,0case. In: Optics express. 2020 ; Vol. 28, No. 24. pp. 35816-35832.
Download
@article{509b5e6eb7f14b1bbe5e998d1843a53c,
title = "Numerical analysis of LG3,3second harmonic generation in comparison to the LG0,0case",
abstract = "For coating Brownian thermal noise reduction in future gravitational wave detectors, it is proposed to use light in the helical Laguerre-Gaussian LG3,3 mode instead of the currently used LG0,0 mode. However, the simultaneous reduction of quantum noise would then require the efficient generation of squeezed vacuum states in the LG3,3 mode. Current squeezed light generation techniques employ continuous-wave second harmonic generation (SHG). Here, we simulate the SHG for both modes numerically to derive first insights into the transferability of standard squeezed light generation techniques to the LG3,3 mode. In the first part of this paper, we therefore theoretically discuss SHG in the case of a single undepleted pump mode, which, in general, excites a superposition of harmonic modes. Based on the differential equation for the harmonic field, we derive individual phase matching conditions and hence conversion efficiencies for the excited harmonic modes. In the second part, we analyse the numerical simulations of the LG0,0 and LG3,3 SHG in a single-pass, double-pass and cavity-enhanced configuration under the influence of the focusing, the different pump intensity distributions and the individual phase matching conditions. Our results predict that the LG3,3 mode requires about 14 times the pump power of the LG0,0 mode to achieve the same SHG conversion efficiency in an ideal, realistic cavity design and mainly generates the harmonic LG6,6 mode. ",
author = "Joscha Heinze and Henning Vahlbruch and Benno Willke",
note = "Funding Information: Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany{\textquoteright}s Excellence Strategy - EXC-2123 Quantum Frontiers (390837967). ",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1364/OE.409507",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "35816--35832",
journal = "Optics express",
issn = "1094-4087",
publisher = "OSA - The Optical Society",
number = "24",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical analysis of LG3,3second harmonic generation in comparison to the LG0,0case

AU - Heinze, Joscha

AU - Vahlbruch, Henning

AU - Willke, Benno

N1 - Funding Information: Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy - EXC-2123 Quantum Frontiers (390837967).

PY - 2020/11/10

Y1 - 2020/11/10

N2 - For coating Brownian thermal noise reduction in future gravitational wave detectors, it is proposed to use light in the helical Laguerre-Gaussian LG3,3 mode instead of the currently used LG0,0 mode. However, the simultaneous reduction of quantum noise would then require the efficient generation of squeezed vacuum states in the LG3,3 mode. Current squeezed light generation techniques employ continuous-wave second harmonic generation (SHG). Here, we simulate the SHG for both modes numerically to derive first insights into the transferability of standard squeezed light generation techniques to the LG3,3 mode. In the first part of this paper, we therefore theoretically discuss SHG in the case of a single undepleted pump mode, which, in general, excites a superposition of harmonic modes. Based on the differential equation for the harmonic field, we derive individual phase matching conditions and hence conversion efficiencies for the excited harmonic modes. In the second part, we analyse the numerical simulations of the LG0,0 and LG3,3 SHG in a single-pass, double-pass and cavity-enhanced configuration under the influence of the focusing, the different pump intensity distributions and the individual phase matching conditions. Our results predict that the LG3,3 mode requires about 14 times the pump power of the LG0,0 mode to achieve the same SHG conversion efficiency in an ideal, realistic cavity design and mainly generates the harmonic LG6,6 mode.

AB - For coating Brownian thermal noise reduction in future gravitational wave detectors, it is proposed to use light in the helical Laguerre-Gaussian LG3,3 mode instead of the currently used LG0,0 mode. However, the simultaneous reduction of quantum noise would then require the efficient generation of squeezed vacuum states in the LG3,3 mode. Current squeezed light generation techniques employ continuous-wave second harmonic generation (SHG). Here, we simulate the SHG for both modes numerically to derive first insights into the transferability of standard squeezed light generation techniques to the LG3,3 mode. In the first part of this paper, we therefore theoretically discuss SHG in the case of a single undepleted pump mode, which, in general, excites a superposition of harmonic modes. Based on the differential equation for the harmonic field, we derive individual phase matching conditions and hence conversion efficiencies for the excited harmonic modes. In the second part, we analyse the numerical simulations of the LG0,0 and LG3,3 SHG in a single-pass, double-pass and cavity-enhanced configuration under the influence of the focusing, the different pump intensity distributions and the individual phase matching conditions. Our results predict that the LG3,3 mode requires about 14 times the pump power of the LG0,0 mode to achieve the same SHG conversion efficiency in an ideal, realistic cavity design and mainly generates the harmonic LG6,6 mode.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097278825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1364/OE.409507

DO - 10.1364/OE.409507

M3 - Article

C2 - 33379690

AN - SCOPUS:85097278825

VL - 28

SP - 35816

EP - 35832

JO - Optics express

JF - Optics express

SN - 1094-4087

IS - 24

ER -