Novel breeding strategies for ornamental dahlias II: Molecular analyses of genetic distances between Dahlia cultivars and wild species

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-103
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Horticultural Science
Volume73
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

Abstract

Genetic distances between nineteen Dahlia cultivars and three genotypes of wild Dahlia species and a hybrid were analysed with 1432 AFLP-Markers generated by 10 Hind/Mse primer combinations. Markers were transformed into a 0/1-matrix and relative distances were computed by means of the Jaccard-coefficient. From these data a dendrogram was constructed by the UPGMA-method. In the dendrogram the cultivars cluster together into one group, while the wild species and the hybrid branched off at a larger genetic distance. The level of genetic similarity of the cultivars averaged between 0.68 and 0.77. Only two varieties displayed a similarity of 0.92 to each other. This relatively large genetic distance between the cultivars indicates a vast potential for further variety development. Within the cultivars different clusters are formed which do not show any relation to phenotypic characteristics like inflorescence morphology or breeding origin. This lack of correlation indicates that a classification of dahlias into horticultural groups does not reflect genetic relationships between cultivars. Therefore, this classification should not be used to select parents for further breeding apart for the few characters it is built on. With knowledge about the genetic background additional information for the selection of genotypes as parent in breeding is available. Genotypes can be choosen for their low level of relatedness or for their genetically characteristics independent from the horticultural type.

Keywords

    AFLP, Asteraceae, Coreopsidinae, Dendrogram, Heliantheae, UPGMA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Novel breeding strategies for ornamental dahlias II: Molecular analyses of genetic distances between Dahlia cultivars and wild species. / Wegner, Hilke; Debener, Thomas.
In: European Journal of Horticultural Science, Vol. 73, No. 3, 06.2008, p. 97-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{9a51d986eb58444795098789fa3a266c,
title = "Novel breeding strategies for ornamental dahlias II: Molecular analyses of genetic distances between Dahlia cultivars and wild species",
abstract = "Genetic distances between nineteen Dahlia cultivars and three genotypes of wild Dahlia species and a hybrid were analysed with 1432 AFLP-Markers generated by 10 Hind/Mse primer combinations. Markers were transformed into a 0/1-matrix and relative distances were computed by means of the Jaccard-coefficient. From these data a dendrogram was constructed by the UPGMA-method. In the dendrogram the cultivars cluster together into one group, while the wild species and the hybrid branched off at a larger genetic distance. The level of genetic similarity of the cultivars averaged between 0.68 and 0.77. Only two varieties displayed a similarity of 0.92 to each other. This relatively large genetic distance between the cultivars indicates a vast potential for further variety development. Within the cultivars different clusters are formed which do not show any relation to phenotypic characteristics like inflorescence morphology or breeding origin. This lack of correlation indicates that a classification of dahlias into horticultural groups does not reflect genetic relationships between cultivars. Therefore, this classification should not be used to select parents for further breeding apart for the few characters it is built on. With knowledge about the genetic background additional information for the selection of genotypes as parent in breeding is available. Genotypes can be choosen for their low level of relatedness or for their genetically characteristics independent from the horticultural type.",
keywords = "AFLP, Asteraceae, Coreopsidinae, Dendrogram, Heliantheae, UPGMA",
author = "Hilke Wegner and Thomas Debener",
year = "2008",
month = jun,
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "97--103",
journal = "European Journal of Horticultural Science",
issn = "1611-4434",
publisher = "Verlag Eugen Ulmer",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Novel breeding strategies for ornamental dahlias II

T2 - Molecular analyses of genetic distances between Dahlia cultivars and wild species

AU - Wegner, Hilke

AU - Debener, Thomas

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Genetic distances between nineteen Dahlia cultivars and three genotypes of wild Dahlia species and a hybrid were analysed with 1432 AFLP-Markers generated by 10 Hind/Mse primer combinations. Markers were transformed into a 0/1-matrix and relative distances were computed by means of the Jaccard-coefficient. From these data a dendrogram was constructed by the UPGMA-method. In the dendrogram the cultivars cluster together into one group, while the wild species and the hybrid branched off at a larger genetic distance. The level of genetic similarity of the cultivars averaged between 0.68 and 0.77. Only two varieties displayed a similarity of 0.92 to each other. This relatively large genetic distance between the cultivars indicates a vast potential for further variety development. Within the cultivars different clusters are formed which do not show any relation to phenotypic characteristics like inflorescence morphology or breeding origin. This lack of correlation indicates that a classification of dahlias into horticultural groups does not reflect genetic relationships between cultivars. Therefore, this classification should not be used to select parents for further breeding apart for the few characters it is built on. With knowledge about the genetic background additional information for the selection of genotypes as parent in breeding is available. Genotypes can be choosen for their low level of relatedness or for their genetically characteristics independent from the horticultural type.

AB - Genetic distances between nineteen Dahlia cultivars and three genotypes of wild Dahlia species and a hybrid were analysed with 1432 AFLP-Markers generated by 10 Hind/Mse primer combinations. Markers were transformed into a 0/1-matrix and relative distances were computed by means of the Jaccard-coefficient. From these data a dendrogram was constructed by the UPGMA-method. In the dendrogram the cultivars cluster together into one group, while the wild species and the hybrid branched off at a larger genetic distance. The level of genetic similarity of the cultivars averaged between 0.68 and 0.77. Only two varieties displayed a similarity of 0.92 to each other. This relatively large genetic distance between the cultivars indicates a vast potential for further variety development. Within the cultivars different clusters are formed which do not show any relation to phenotypic characteristics like inflorescence morphology or breeding origin. This lack of correlation indicates that a classification of dahlias into horticultural groups does not reflect genetic relationships between cultivars. Therefore, this classification should not be used to select parents for further breeding apart for the few characters it is built on. With knowledge about the genetic background additional information for the selection of genotypes as parent in breeding is available. Genotypes can be choosen for their low level of relatedness or for their genetically characteristics independent from the horticultural type.

KW - AFLP

KW - Asteraceae

KW - Coreopsidinae

KW - Dendrogram

KW - Heliantheae

KW - UPGMA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46849101990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:46849101990

VL - 73

SP - 97

EP - 103

JO - European Journal of Horticultural Science

JF - European Journal of Horticultural Science

SN - 1611-4434

IS - 3

ER -

By the same author(s)