Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

No recombination detected in artificial potyvirus mixed infections and between potyvirus derived transgenes and heterologous challenging potyviruses.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Christof Dietrich
  • Jane Miller
  • Gaynor McKenzie
  • László Palkovics
  • Edgar Maiss

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures
  • Scottish Crop Research Institute (SCRI)
  • Corvinus University of Budapest
  • Agricultural Research Institute

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-218
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironmental Biosafety Research
Volume6
Issue number3
Early online date16 Nov 2007
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Abstract

Risk-assessment studies of virus-resistant transgenic plants (VRTPs) focussing on recombination of a plant virus with a transgenic sequence of a different virus should include a comparison of recombination frequencies between viruses in double-infected non-transgenic plants with those observed in singly infected transgenic plants to estimate recombination incidence in VRTPs. In this study, the occurrence of recombination events was investigated in non-transgenic plants double-infected with two different potyviruses, as well as in potyviral genomes in singly infected transgenic plants expressing potyvirus sequences. Different potyviruses, namely Potato virus A (PVA), Tobacco vein mottling virus (TVMV), two strains of Potato virus Y (PVY-O, PVY-H) and two strains of Plum pox virus (PPV-NAT, PPV-SK68), were used in three combinations for double infection of a common host. Furthermore, transgenic plants expressing either potyviral coat protein (CP), helicase (CI) or polymerase (NIb) coding sequences (PPV-NAT-CP, PVY-CI, PVY-NIb) were singly-infected with a heterologous potyvirus, which was not targeted by the respective transgenic resistance. To identify recombinant potyviral sequences, a sensitive RT-PCR was developed to detect up to one recombinant molecule out of 10(6) parental molecules. In 304 mixed infected non-transgenic plants, 92 mixed and 164 single infected transgenic plants screened for recombinant sequences no recombinant potyviral sequence was found. These results indicate that recombination events between different potyviruses in mixed infections and between a potyvirus infecting a potyvirus-resistant transgenic plant are likely to be very infrequent.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

No recombination detected in artificial potyvirus mixed infections and between potyvirus derived transgenes and heterologous challenging potyviruses. / Dietrich, Christof; Miller, Jane; McKenzie, Gaynor et al.
In: Environmental Biosafety Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2007, p. 207-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Dietrich, C, Miller, J, McKenzie, G, Palkovics, L, Balázs, E, Palukaitis, P & Maiss, E 2007, 'No recombination detected in artificial potyvirus mixed infections and between potyvirus derived transgenes and heterologous challenging potyviruses.', Environmental Biosafety Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007042
Dietrich, C., Miller, J., McKenzie, G., Palkovics, L., Balázs, E., Palukaitis, P., & Maiss, E. (2007). No recombination detected in artificial potyvirus mixed infections and between potyvirus derived transgenes and heterologous challenging potyviruses. Environmental Biosafety Research, 6(3), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007042
Dietrich C, Miller J, McKenzie G, Palkovics L, Balázs E, Palukaitis P et al. No recombination detected in artificial potyvirus mixed infections and between potyvirus derived transgenes and heterologous challenging potyviruses. Environmental Biosafety Research. 2007;6(3):207-218. Epub 2007 Nov 16. doi: 10.1051/ebr:2007042
Dietrich, Christof ; Miller, Jane ; McKenzie, Gaynor et al. / No recombination detected in artificial potyvirus mixed infections and between potyvirus derived transgenes and heterologous challenging potyviruses. In: Environmental Biosafety Research. 2007 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 207-218.
Download
@article{e2cdc494ff5e4740a49ff0f6dd02e5e8,
title = "No recombination detected in artificial potyvirus mixed infections and between potyvirus derived transgenes and heterologous challenging potyviruses.",
abstract = "Risk-assessment studies of virus-resistant transgenic plants (VRTPs) focussing on recombination of a plant virus with a transgenic sequence of a different virus should include a comparison of recombination frequencies between viruses in double-infected non-transgenic plants with those observed in singly infected transgenic plants to estimate recombination incidence in VRTPs. In this study, the occurrence of recombination events was investigated in non-transgenic plants double-infected with two different potyviruses, as well as in potyviral genomes in singly infected transgenic plants expressing potyvirus sequences. Different potyviruses, namely Potato virus A (PVA), Tobacco vein mottling virus (TVMV), two strains of Potato virus Y (PVY-O, PVY-H) and two strains of Plum pox virus (PPV-NAT, PPV-SK68), were used in three combinations for double infection of a common host. Furthermore, transgenic plants expressing either potyviral coat protein (CP), helicase (CI) or polymerase (NIb) coding sequences (PPV-NAT-CP, PVY-CI, PVY-NIb) were singly-infected with a heterologous potyvirus, which was not targeted by the respective transgenic resistance. To identify recombinant potyviral sequences, a sensitive RT-PCR was developed to detect up to one recombinant molecule out of 10(6) parental molecules. In 304 mixed infected non-transgenic plants, 92 mixed and 164 single infected transgenic plants screened for recombinant sequences no recombinant potyviral sequence was found. These results indicate that recombination events between different potyviruses in mixed infections and between a potyvirus infecting a potyvirus-resistant transgenic plant are likely to be very infrequent.",
author = "Christof Dietrich and Jane Miller and Gaynor McKenzie and L{\'a}szl{\'o} Palkovics and Ervin Bal{\'a}zs and Peter Palukaitis and Edgar Maiss",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1051/ebr:2007042",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "207--218",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - No recombination detected in artificial potyvirus mixed infections and between potyvirus derived transgenes and heterologous challenging potyviruses.

AU - Dietrich, Christof

AU - Miller, Jane

AU - McKenzie, Gaynor

AU - Palkovics, László

AU - Balázs, Ervin

AU - Palukaitis, Peter

AU - Maiss, Edgar

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Risk-assessment studies of virus-resistant transgenic plants (VRTPs) focussing on recombination of a plant virus with a transgenic sequence of a different virus should include a comparison of recombination frequencies between viruses in double-infected non-transgenic plants with those observed in singly infected transgenic plants to estimate recombination incidence in VRTPs. In this study, the occurrence of recombination events was investigated in non-transgenic plants double-infected with two different potyviruses, as well as in potyviral genomes in singly infected transgenic plants expressing potyvirus sequences. Different potyviruses, namely Potato virus A (PVA), Tobacco vein mottling virus (TVMV), two strains of Potato virus Y (PVY-O, PVY-H) and two strains of Plum pox virus (PPV-NAT, PPV-SK68), were used in three combinations for double infection of a common host. Furthermore, transgenic plants expressing either potyviral coat protein (CP), helicase (CI) or polymerase (NIb) coding sequences (PPV-NAT-CP, PVY-CI, PVY-NIb) were singly-infected with a heterologous potyvirus, which was not targeted by the respective transgenic resistance. To identify recombinant potyviral sequences, a sensitive RT-PCR was developed to detect up to one recombinant molecule out of 10(6) parental molecules. In 304 mixed infected non-transgenic plants, 92 mixed and 164 single infected transgenic plants screened for recombinant sequences no recombinant potyviral sequence was found. These results indicate that recombination events between different potyviruses in mixed infections and between a potyvirus infecting a potyvirus-resistant transgenic plant are likely to be very infrequent.

AB - Risk-assessment studies of virus-resistant transgenic plants (VRTPs) focussing on recombination of a plant virus with a transgenic sequence of a different virus should include a comparison of recombination frequencies between viruses in double-infected non-transgenic plants with those observed in singly infected transgenic plants to estimate recombination incidence in VRTPs. In this study, the occurrence of recombination events was investigated in non-transgenic plants double-infected with two different potyviruses, as well as in potyviral genomes in singly infected transgenic plants expressing potyvirus sequences. Different potyviruses, namely Potato virus A (PVA), Tobacco vein mottling virus (TVMV), two strains of Potato virus Y (PVY-O, PVY-H) and two strains of Plum pox virus (PPV-NAT, PPV-SK68), were used in three combinations for double infection of a common host. Furthermore, transgenic plants expressing either potyviral coat protein (CP), helicase (CI) or polymerase (NIb) coding sequences (PPV-NAT-CP, PVY-CI, PVY-NIb) were singly-infected with a heterologous potyvirus, which was not targeted by the respective transgenic resistance. To identify recombinant potyviral sequences, a sensitive RT-PCR was developed to detect up to one recombinant molecule out of 10(6) parental molecules. In 304 mixed infected non-transgenic plants, 92 mixed and 164 single infected transgenic plants screened for recombinant sequences no recombinant potyviral sequence was found. These results indicate that recombination events between different potyviruses in mixed infections and between a potyvirus infecting a potyvirus-resistant transgenic plant are likely to be very infrequent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349071257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1051/ebr:2007042

DO - 10.1051/ebr:2007042

M3 - Article

C2 - 18001687

AN - SCOPUS:38349071257

VL - 6

SP - 207

EP - 218

JO - Environmental Biosafety Research

JF - Environmental Biosafety Research

SN - 1635-7922

IS - 3

ER -