Naturschutzfachlich modifizierte Kurzumtriebsplantagen als Lebensraum für Brutvögel: Eine alternative zu anderen gehölzgeprägten naturschutzmaßnahmen?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

Authors

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionConservation modified short-rotation coppice for breeding birds – alternative conservation measure to other woody habitats?
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)316-325
Number of pages10
JournalNaturschutz und Landschaftsplanung
Volume52
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Abstract

A discussion has recently arisen about the suitability of shortrotation coppice (SRC) for production-integrated compensation measures (PICM) due to its beneficial effects on some ecosystem functions. In order to evaluate the suitability of SRC with nature conservation modifications for PICM, we surveyed their habitat potential for breeding birds in comparison to woody habitats in agricultural landscapes (hedges, copses, afforestations). The results are discussed with regard to whether SRC are a favourable alternative to other woody habitats as a nature conservation measure to promote breeding birds. Despite measures to improve the structural diversity of the surveyed SRC, they only supported rudimentary, species-poor and individual-poor breeding bird communities, and only attained the habitat function of other woody habitats to a limited extent. Certain habitat qualities of other woody habitats cannot be created on SRC or can only be effectively created in a complex and spatially limited manner. Some measures required for this are contrary to the basic objectives of PICM due to the fact that they are “non-productive special structures”. These results complement investigations on SRC without nature conservation modifications and confirm that SRC do not represent a favourable alternative measure for breeding birds compared to other woody habitats that commonly encompass nature conservation measures.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Naturschutzfachlich modifizierte Kurzumtriebsplantagen als Lebensraum für Brutvögel: Eine alternative zu anderen gehölzgeprägten naturschutzmaßnahmen? / Zitzmann, Felix; Reich, Michael.
In: Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, Vol. 52, No. 7, 2020, p. 316-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

Download
@article{efb804e9c5614c7c8518bbbc7012b1b9,
title = "Naturschutzfachlich modifizierte Kurzumtriebsplantagen als Lebensraum f{\"u}r Brutv{\"o}gel: Eine alternative zu anderen geh{\"o}lzgepr{\"a}gten naturschutzma{\ss}nahmen?",
abstract = "A discussion has recently arisen about the suitability of shortrotation coppice (SRC) for production-integrated compensation measures (PICM) due to its beneficial effects on some ecosystem functions. In order to evaluate the suitability of SRC with nature conservation modifications for PICM, we surveyed their habitat potential for breeding birds in comparison to woody habitats in agricultural landscapes (hedges, copses, afforestations). The results are discussed with regard to whether SRC are a favourable alternative to other woody habitats as a nature conservation measure to promote breeding birds. Despite measures to improve the structural diversity of the surveyed SRC, they only supported rudimentary, species-poor and individual-poor breeding bird communities, and only attained the habitat function of other woody habitats to a limited extent. Certain habitat qualities of other woody habitats cannot be created on SRC or can only be effectively created in a complex and spatially limited manner. Some measures required for this are contrary to the basic objectives of PICM due to the fact that they are “non-productive special structures”. These results complement investigations on SRC without nature conservation modifications and confirm that SRC do not represent a favourable alternative measure for breeding birds compared to other woody habitats that commonly encompass nature conservation measures.",
author = "Felix Zitzmann and Michael Reich",
note = "Dank Die Untersuchungen wurden im Rahmen eines vom Nieders{\"a}chsischen Ministeriums f{\"u}r Ern{\"a}hrung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz gef{\"o}rderten Forschungsvorhabens durchgef{\"u}hrt. Wir danken Gunnar Bargholz, Nina Josef und Martin Schote f{\"u}r Unterst{\"u}tzung bei den Feldarbeiten und Michael Rode sowie den beiden anonymen GutachterInnen f{\"u}r ihre hilfreichen Anmerkungen zum Manuskript.",
year = "2020",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "52",
pages = "316--325",
number = "7",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Naturschutzfachlich modifizierte Kurzumtriebsplantagen als Lebensraum für Brutvögel

T2 - Eine alternative zu anderen gehölzgeprägten naturschutzmaßnahmen?

AU - Zitzmann, Felix

AU - Reich, Michael

N1 - Dank Die Untersuchungen wurden im Rahmen eines vom Niedersächsischen Ministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz geförderten Forschungsvorhabens durchgeführt. Wir danken Gunnar Bargholz, Nina Josef und Martin Schote für Unterstützung bei den Feldarbeiten und Michael Rode sowie den beiden anonymen GutachterInnen für ihre hilfreichen Anmerkungen zum Manuskript.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - A discussion has recently arisen about the suitability of shortrotation coppice (SRC) for production-integrated compensation measures (PICM) due to its beneficial effects on some ecosystem functions. In order to evaluate the suitability of SRC with nature conservation modifications for PICM, we surveyed their habitat potential for breeding birds in comparison to woody habitats in agricultural landscapes (hedges, copses, afforestations). The results are discussed with regard to whether SRC are a favourable alternative to other woody habitats as a nature conservation measure to promote breeding birds. Despite measures to improve the structural diversity of the surveyed SRC, they only supported rudimentary, species-poor and individual-poor breeding bird communities, and only attained the habitat function of other woody habitats to a limited extent. Certain habitat qualities of other woody habitats cannot be created on SRC or can only be effectively created in a complex and spatially limited manner. Some measures required for this are contrary to the basic objectives of PICM due to the fact that they are “non-productive special structures”. These results complement investigations on SRC without nature conservation modifications and confirm that SRC do not represent a favourable alternative measure for breeding birds compared to other woody habitats that commonly encompass nature conservation measures.

AB - A discussion has recently arisen about the suitability of shortrotation coppice (SRC) for production-integrated compensation measures (PICM) due to its beneficial effects on some ecosystem functions. In order to evaluate the suitability of SRC with nature conservation modifications for PICM, we surveyed their habitat potential for breeding birds in comparison to woody habitats in agricultural landscapes (hedges, copses, afforestations). The results are discussed with regard to whether SRC are a favourable alternative to other woody habitats as a nature conservation measure to promote breeding birds. Despite measures to improve the structural diversity of the surveyed SRC, they only supported rudimentary, species-poor and individual-poor breeding bird communities, and only attained the habitat function of other woody habitats to a limited extent. Certain habitat qualities of other woody habitats cannot be created on SRC or can only be effectively created in a complex and spatially limited manner. Some measures required for this are contrary to the basic objectives of PICM due to the fact that they are “non-productive special structures”. These results complement investigations on SRC without nature conservation modifications and confirm that SRC do not represent a favourable alternative measure for breeding birds compared to other woody habitats that commonly encompass nature conservation measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088502592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Artikel

AN - SCOPUS:85088502592

VL - 52

SP - 316

EP - 325

JO - Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung

JF - Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung

SN - 0940-6808

IS - 7

ER -

By the same author(s)