Nährstoffsupplemente - Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Teil 5: Supplemente in der Primärprävention - Methodologische Aspekte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionFood supplements in primary prevention - Methodological aspects
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)13-26
Number of pages14
JournalMedizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten
Volume37
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Abstract

The terms "evidence" or "evidence-based medicine" (EBM) dominate the current biomedical debate. When asked about the usefulness of nutritional supplements, increasingly reliable studies and "evidence- based" recommendations are demanded. However, usually, it remains unclear what is meant by "evidence" and "evidence-based medicine". The aim of the current paper is to clarify and explain why continuous designed evaluation instruments, proofing the efficacy of pharmacological active compounds, cannot be applied without modifications to prove the benefits of nutrients. The focus bases on the following questions: (a) What does evidence-based medicine exactly means and how does it differ from non-evidence-based medicine? (b) What is the meaning of "evidence" and "evidencebased statements"? (c) What types of studies are suitable for securing evidence? (d) How can be drawn summarizing conclusions from various, sometimes divergent, results of single studies? (e) Which specific characteristics must be considered in the nutrition context?

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Nährstoffsupplemente - Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Teil 5: Supplemente in der Primärprävention - Methodologische Aspekte. / Ströhle, A.; Hahn, A. .
In: Medizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 13-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

Ströhle, A & Hahn, A 2014, 'Nährstoffsupplemente - Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Teil 5: Supplemente in der Primärprävention - Methodologische Aspekte', Medizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 13-26.
Ströhle, A. ; Hahn, A. . / Nährstoffsupplemente - Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Teil 5: Supplemente in der Primärprävention - Methodologische Aspekte. In: Medizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten. 2014 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 13-26.
Download
@article{ac9f4205b2754b82937050ebd1f84af6,
title = "N{\"a}hrstoffsupplemente - M{\"o}glichkeiten und Grenzen. Teil 5: Supplemente in der Prim{\"a}rpr{\"a}vention - Methodologische Aspekte",
abstract = "The terms {"}evidence{"} or {"}evidence-based medicine{"} (EBM) dominate the current biomedical debate. When asked about the usefulness of nutritional supplements, increasingly reliable studies and {"}evidence- based{"} recommendations are demanded. However, usually, it remains unclear what is meant by {"}evidence{"} and {"}evidence-based medicine{"}. The aim of the current paper is to clarify and explain why continuous designed evaluation instruments, proofing the efficacy of pharmacological active compounds, cannot be applied without modifications to prove the benefits of nutrients. The focus bases on the following questions: (a) What does evidence-based medicine exactly means and how does it differ from non-evidence-based medicine? (b) What is the meaning of {"}evidence{"} and {"}evidencebased statements{"}? (c) What types of studies are suitable for securing evidence? (d) How can be drawn summarizing conclusions from various, sometimes divergent, results of single studies? (e) Which specific characteristics must be considered in the nutrition context?",
keywords = "Cause-effect-relationship, Evidence, Evidence-based medicine, Hill-criteria, Nutrients",
author = "A. Str{\"o}hle and A.  Hahn",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "37",
pages = "13--26",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nährstoffsupplemente - Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Teil 5: Supplemente in der Primärprävention - Methodologische Aspekte

AU - Ströhle, A.

AU - Hahn, A. 

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - The terms "evidence" or "evidence-based medicine" (EBM) dominate the current biomedical debate. When asked about the usefulness of nutritional supplements, increasingly reliable studies and "evidence- based" recommendations are demanded. However, usually, it remains unclear what is meant by "evidence" and "evidence-based medicine". The aim of the current paper is to clarify and explain why continuous designed evaluation instruments, proofing the efficacy of pharmacological active compounds, cannot be applied without modifications to prove the benefits of nutrients. The focus bases on the following questions: (a) What does evidence-based medicine exactly means and how does it differ from non-evidence-based medicine? (b) What is the meaning of "evidence" and "evidencebased statements"? (c) What types of studies are suitable for securing evidence? (d) How can be drawn summarizing conclusions from various, sometimes divergent, results of single studies? (e) Which specific characteristics must be considered in the nutrition context?

AB - The terms "evidence" or "evidence-based medicine" (EBM) dominate the current biomedical debate. When asked about the usefulness of nutritional supplements, increasingly reliable studies and "evidence- based" recommendations are demanded. However, usually, it remains unclear what is meant by "evidence" and "evidence-based medicine". The aim of the current paper is to clarify and explain why continuous designed evaluation instruments, proofing the efficacy of pharmacological active compounds, cannot be applied without modifications to prove the benefits of nutrients. The focus bases on the following questions: (a) What does evidence-based medicine exactly means and how does it differ from non-evidence-based medicine? (b) What is the meaning of "evidence" and "evidencebased statements"? (c) What types of studies are suitable for securing evidence? (d) How can be drawn summarizing conclusions from various, sometimes divergent, results of single studies? (e) Which specific characteristics must be considered in the nutrition context?

KW - Cause-effect-relationship

KW - Evidence

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Hill-criteria

KW - Nutrients

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892169521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Artikel

VL - 37

SP - 13

EP - 26

JO - Medizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten

JF - Medizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten

SN - 0342-9601

IS - 1

ER -

By the same author(s)