Nach welchen ökonomischen Methoden sollten Gesundheitsleistungen in Deutschland evaluiert werden?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • J. Matthias Graf Von Der Schulenburg
  • Christoph Vauth

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionAccording to which economic methods should health care services become evaluated in Germany?
Original languageMultiple languages
Pages (from-to)787-805
Number of pages19
JournalJahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik
Volume227
Issue number5-6
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

Abstract

The paper presents the methodological challenges of the introduction of cost-benefit assessment by the German legislative (Competition Enhancement Act). Based on the standards for health economic evaluation accepted by the international scientific health economic community, this paper provides a minimum catalogue of methods and criteria to meet the legal German requirements. The methodological framework presented in this paper discusses the perspective to be used to evaluate cost and benefits, lists the appropriate study form, names the usage of primary or secondary data, the description of the cost and benefit calculation, shows the specific need on modelling and how to handle uncertainties and calls for a disclosure of potential conflict of interests. Further more, the paper contains detailed recommendations for the assessment-process in Germany. According to the new Competition Enhancement Act, the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen, IQWiG) has to evaluate the cost-benefit ratio of pharmaceuticals in Germany. The process should be organised within two sequently parts: At first the development of a reporting plan that defines the comparative interventions to be included, the target criteria, assessment methods and the schedule to be observed, and secondly the implementation of the cost-benefit assessment.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Nach welchen ökonomischen Methoden sollten Gesundheitsleistungen in Deutschland evaluiert werden? / Von Der Schulenburg, J. Matthias Graf; Vauth, Christoph.
In: Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik, Vol. 227, No. 5-6, 12.2007, p. 787-805.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Von Der Schulenburg, J. Matthias Graf ; Vauth, Christoph. / Nach welchen ökonomischen Methoden sollten Gesundheitsleistungen in Deutschland evaluiert werden?. In: Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik. 2007 ; Vol. 227, No. 5-6. pp. 787-805.
Download
@article{31c9dc4f748d4ad9a400a186293012cd,
title = "Nach welchen {\"o}konomischen Methoden sollten Gesundheitsleistungen in Deutschland evaluiert werden?",
abstract = "The paper presents the methodological challenges of the introduction of cost-benefit assessment by the German legislative (Competition Enhancement Act). Based on the standards for health economic evaluation accepted by the international scientific health economic community, this paper provides a minimum catalogue of methods and criteria to meet the legal German requirements. The methodological framework presented in this paper discusses the perspective to be used to evaluate cost and benefits, lists the appropriate study form, names the usage of primary or secondary data, the description of the cost and benefit calculation, shows the specific need on modelling and how to handle uncertainties and calls for a disclosure of potential conflict of interests. Further more, the paper contains detailed recommendations for the assessment-process in Germany. According to the new Competition Enhancement Act, the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (Institut f{\"u}r Qualit{\"a}t und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen, IQWiG) has to evaluate the cost-benefit ratio of pharmaceuticals in Germany. The process should be organised within two sequently parts: At first the development of a reporting plan that defines the comparative interventions to be included, the target criteria, assessment methods and the schedule to be observed, and secondly the implementation of the cost-benefit assessment.",
keywords = "Cost-benefit assessment, Evaluation, Germany, Health-economics, Methods",
author = "{Von Der Schulenburg}, {J. Matthias Graf} and Christoph Vauth",
year = "2007",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1515/jbnst-2007-5-621",
language = "Multiple languages",
volume = "227",
pages = "787--805",
journal = "Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik",
issn = "0021-4027",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "5-6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nach welchen ökonomischen Methoden sollten Gesundheitsleistungen in Deutschland evaluiert werden?

AU - Von Der Schulenburg, J. Matthias Graf

AU - Vauth, Christoph

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - The paper presents the methodological challenges of the introduction of cost-benefit assessment by the German legislative (Competition Enhancement Act). Based on the standards for health economic evaluation accepted by the international scientific health economic community, this paper provides a minimum catalogue of methods and criteria to meet the legal German requirements. The methodological framework presented in this paper discusses the perspective to be used to evaluate cost and benefits, lists the appropriate study form, names the usage of primary or secondary data, the description of the cost and benefit calculation, shows the specific need on modelling and how to handle uncertainties and calls for a disclosure of potential conflict of interests. Further more, the paper contains detailed recommendations for the assessment-process in Germany. According to the new Competition Enhancement Act, the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen, IQWiG) has to evaluate the cost-benefit ratio of pharmaceuticals in Germany. The process should be organised within two sequently parts: At first the development of a reporting plan that defines the comparative interventions to be included, the target criteria, assessment methods and the schedule to be observed, and secondly the implementation of the cost-benefit assessment.

AB - The paper presents the methodological challenges of the introduction of cost-benefit assessment by the German legislative (Competition Enhancement Act). Based on the standards for health economic evaluation accepted by the international scientific health economic community, this paper provides a minimum catalogue of methods and criteria to meet the legal German requirements. The methodological framework presented in this paper discusses the perspective to be used to evaluate cost and benefits, lists the appropriate study form, names the usage of primary or secondary data, the description of the cost and benefit calculation, shows the specific need on modelling and how to handle uncertainties and calls for a disclosure of potential conflict of interests. Further more, the paper contains detailed recommendations for the assessment-process in Germany. According to the new Competition Enhancement Act, the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen, IQWiG) has to evaluate the cost-benefit ratio of pharmaceuticals in Germany. The process should be organised within two sequently parts: At first the development of a reporting plan that defines the comparative interventions to be included, the target criteria, assessment methods and the schedule to be observed, and secondly the implementation of the cost-benefit assessment.

KW - Cost-benefit assessment

KW - Evaluation

KW - Germany

KW - Health-economics

KW - Methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44649192930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/jbnst-2007-5-621

DO - 10.1515/jbnst-2007-5-621

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:44649192930

VL - 227

SP - 787

EP - 805

JO - Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik

JF - Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik

SN - 0021-4027

IS - 5-6

ER -