More than spatial coordination: How Dutch agricultural collectives foster social capital for effective governance of agri-environmental measures

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Rena Barghusen
  • Claudia Sattler
  • Richard Berner
  • Bettina Matzdorf

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU Berlin)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-258
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume96
Early online date17 Nov 2022
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Abstract

Collective approaches for agri-environmental measures are known for aiming at spatial coordination of measures to enhance ecological effectiveness. In the Netherlands, governance networks for agri-environmental measures are centered around agricultural collectives that function as intermediaries between individual farmers and governmental as well as non-governmental actors. Against the background that some agricultural collectives are bottom-up and other top-down initiated, we analyzed in how far they can build up social capital through formal and informal relations. We used the Net-Map method to collect qualitative and quantitative data for a Social Network Analysis to uncover the network characteristics that contribute to a certain level of social capital. The results revealed that the umbrella organization links the collectives to the national governmental level and to other collectives. This is especially important for top-down initiated collectives. The facilitation of internal meetings within the collectives is important for social learning. Furthermore, a formalization of the exchange between collectives and stakeholders of nature conservation could strengthen cooperation where traditionally conflicts dominate. By analyzing interaction in detail, the social reasoning to promote collective agri-environmental measures was highlighted. They enable collaboration of different stakeholders at multiple levels to the end that knowledge and resources are bundled.

Keywords

    AECM, Bottom-up vs. top-down initiated, Governance of ecosystem services, Net-map tool, Social network analysis, Social-ecological systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

More than spatial coordination: How Dutch agricultural collectives foster social capital for effective governance of agri-environmental measures. / Barghusen, Rena; Sattler, Claudia; Berner, Richard et al.
In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 96, 12.2022, p. 246-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Barghusen R, Sattler C, Berner R, Matzdorf B. More than spatial coordination: How Dutch agricultural collectives foster social capital for effective governance of agri-environmental measures. Journal of Rural Studies. 2022 Dec;96:246-258. Epub 2022 Nov 17. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.023
Download
@article{bf4efc3487644d93a19a8be65de9e9b4,
title = "More than spatial coordination: How Dutch agricultural collectives foster social capital for effective governance of agri-environmental measures",
abstract = "Collective approaches for agri-environmental measures are known for aiming at spatial coordination of measures to enhance ecological effectiveness. In the Netherlands, governance networks for agri-environmental measures are centered around agricultural collectives that function as intermediaries between individual farmers and governmental as well as non-governmental actors. Against the background that some agricultural collectives are bottom-up and other top-down initiated, we analyzed in how far they can build up social capital through formal and informal relations. We used the Net-Map method to collect qualitative and quantitative data for a Social Network Analysis to uncover the network characteristics that contribute to a certain level of social capital. The results revealed that the umbrella organization links the collectives to the national governmental level and to other collectives. This is especially important for top-down initiated collectives. The facilitation of internal meetings within the collectives is important for social learning. Furthermore, a formalization of the exchange between collectives and stakeholders of nature conservation could strengthen cooperation where traditionally conflicts dominate. By analyzing interaction in detail, the social reasoning to promote collective agri-environmental measures was highlighted. They enable collaboration of different stakeholders at multiple levels to the end that knowledge and resources are bundled.",
keywords = "AECM, Bottom-up vs. top-down initiated, Governance of ecosystem services, Net-map tool, Social network analysis, Social-ecological systems",
author = "Rena Barghusen and Claudia Sattler and Richard Berner and Bettina Matzdorf",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the ZALF PhD project {\textquoteleft}Landscaper{\textquoteright} and the European Union's Horizon2020 research and innovation program Contracts2.0 under Grant 818,190 . ",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.023",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "246--258",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - More than spatial coordination

T2 - How Dutch agricultural collectives foster social capital for effective governance of agri-environmental measures

AU - Barghusen, Rena

AU - Sattler, Claudia

AU - Berner, Richard

AU - Matzdorf, Bettina

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the ZALF PhD project ‘Landscaper’ and the European Union's Horizon2020 research and innovation program Contracts2.0 under Grant 818,190 .

PY - 2022/12

Y1 - 2022/12

N2 - Collective approaches for agri-environmental measures are known for aiming at spatial coordination of measures to enhance ecological effectiveness. In the Netherlands, governance networks for agri-environmental measures are centered around agricultural collectives that function as intermediaries between individual farmers and governmental as well as non-governmental actors. Against the background that some agricultural collectives are bottom-up and other top-down initiated, we analyzed in how far they can build up social capital through formal and informal relations. We used the Net-Map method to collect qualitative and quantitative data for a Social Network Analysis to uncover the network characteristics that contribute to a certain level of social capital. The results revealed that the umbrella organization links the collectives to the national governmental level and to other collectives. This is especially important for top-down initiated collectives. The facilitation of internal meetings within the collectives is important for social learning. Furthermore, a formalization of the exchange between collectives and stakeholders of nature conservation could strengthen cooperation where traditionally conflicts dominate. By analyzing interaction in detail, the social reasoning to promote collective agri-environmental measures was highlighted. They enable collaboration of different stakeholders at multiple levels to the end that knowledge and resources are bundled.

AB - Collective approaches for agri-environmental measures are known for aiming at spatial coordination of measures to enhance ecological effectiveness. In the Netherlands, governance networks for agri-environmental measures are centered around agricultural collectives that function as intermediaries between individual farmers and governmental as well as non-governmental actors. Against the background that some agricultural collectives are bottom-up and other top-down initiated, we analyzed in how far they can build up social capital through formal and informal relations. We used the Net-Map method to collect qualitative and quantitative data for a Social Network Analysis to uncover the network characteristics that contribute to a certain level of social capital. The results revealed that the umbrella organization links the collectives to the national governmental level and to other collectives. This is especially important for top-down initiated collectives. The facilitation of internal meetings within the collectives is important for social learning. Furthermore, a formalization of the exchange between collectives and stakeholders of nature conservation could strengthen cooperation where traditionally conflicts dominate. By analyzing interaction in detail, the social reasoning to promote collective agri-environmental measures was highlighted. They enable collaboration of different stakeholders at multiple levels to the end that knowledge and resources are bundled.

KW - AECM

KW - Bottom-up vs. top-down initiated

KW - Governance of ecosystem services

KW - Net-map tool

KW - Social network analysis

KW - Social-ecological systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142256318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.023

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.023

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85142256318

VL - 96

SP - 246

EP - 258

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

ER -