Modified Newton methods for solving fully monolithic phase-field quasi-static brittle fracture propagation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Université Paris-Saclay
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)577-611
Number of pages35
JournalComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Volume325
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Our goal in this work is to develop and compare modified Newton methods for fully monolithic quasi-static brittle phase-field fracture propagation. In variational phase-field fracture, a smoothed phase-field indicator variable denoting the crack path is coupled to elasticity. Moreover, a crack irreversibility condition is incorporated. To develop a fully monolithic scheme is an extremely challenging task since the underlying problem is non-convex and the Jacobian of Newton's method is indefinite. To split the problem using alternating minimization, thus a partitioned approach, is a possible resort. However, there are good reasons to consider monolithic approaches such as for example robustness and efficiency. Although an error-oriented Newton method can cope with a larger variety of configurations, it appears that this method is not always robust and also not always efficient. Inspired by nonlinear flow problems, as alternative, we develop a modified Newton scheme in which globalization is based on a dynamic modification of the Jacobian matrix rather than utilizing line-search or trust-region strategies. This variation switches smoothly between full Newton and Newton-like steps. In several 2D and 3D numerical examples, all of them with different characteristic features, our modified Newton solver is compared to a backtracking line-search Newton method, another line-search method monitoring the global energy and allowing for negative curvatures, and to already published results of an error-oriented version. These computations also include further modifications of Newton's method and detailed discussions why certain schemes either work or fail. Revisiting all findings, the main outcome of this paper is that the modified Newton scheme with Jacobian modification is currently the only method that works in a robust and efficient way for all provided examples, whereas line-search schemes or the error-oriented scheme show deficiencies for certain configurations.

Keywords

    Benchmark tests, Inexact augmented Lagrangian, Jacobian modification, Line-search, Modified Newton's method, Phase-field fracture propagation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Modified Newton methods for solving fully monolithic phase-field quasi-static brittle fracture propagation. / Wick, Thomas.
In: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 325, 01.10.2017, p. 577-611.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{51cf198f606a4aa9b9781b52327398bc,
title = "Modified Newton methods for solving fully monolithic phase-field quasi-static brittle fracture propagation",
abstract = "Our goal in this work is to develop and compare modified Newton methods for fully monolithic quasi-static brittle phase-field fracture propagation. In variational phase-field fracture, a smoothed phase-field indicator variable denoting the crack path is coupled to elasticity. Moreover, a crack irreversibility condition is incorporated. To develop a fully monolithic scheme is an extremely challenging task since the underlying problem is non-convex and the Jacobian of Newton's method is indefinite. To split the problem using alternating minimization, thus a partitioned approach, is a possible resort. However, there are good reasons to consider monolithic approaches such as for example robustness and efficiency. Although an error-oriented Newton method can cope with a larger variety of configurations, it appears that this method is not always robust and also not always efficient. Inspired by nonlinear flow problems, as alternative, we develop a modified Newton scheme in which globalization is based on a dynamic modification of the Jacobian matrix rather than utilizing line-search or trust-region strategies. This variation switches smoothly between full Newton and Newton-like steps. In several 2D and 3D numerical examples, all of them with different characteristic features, our modified Newton solver is compared to a backtracking line-search Newton method, another line-search method monitoring the global energy and allowing for negative curvatures, and to already published results of an error-oriented version. These computations also include further modifications of Newton's method and detailed discussions why certain schemes either work or fail. Revisiting all findings, the main outcome of this paper is that the modified Newton scheme with Jacobian modification is currently the only method that works in a robust and efficient way for all provided examples, whereas line-search schemes or the error-oriented scheme show deficiencies for certain configurations.",
keywords = "Benchmark tests, Inexact augmented Lagrangian, Jacobian modification, Line-search, Modified Newton's method, Phase-field fracture propagation",
author = "Thomas Wick",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier B.V. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cma.2017.07.026",
language = "English",
volume = "325",
pages = "577--611",
journal = "Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering",
issn = "0045-7825",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modified Newton methods for solving fully monolithic phase-field quasi-static brittle fracture propagation

AU - Wick, Thomas

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Our goal in this work is to develop and compare modified Newton methods for fully monolithic quasi-static brittle phase-field fracture propagation. In variational phase-field fracture, a smoothed phase-field indicator variable denoting the crack path is coupled to elasticity. Moreover, a crack irreversibility condition is incorporated. To develop a fully monolithic scheme is an extremely challenging task since the underlying problem is non-convex and the Jacobian of Newton's method is indefinite. To split the problem using alternating minimization, thus a partitioned approach, is a possible resort. However, there are good reasons to consider monolithic approaches such as for example robustness and efficiency. Although an error-oriented Newton method can cope with a larger variety of configurations, it appears that this method is not always robust and also not always efficient. Inspired by nonlinear flow problems, as alternative, we develop a modified Newton scheme in which globalization is based on a dynamic modification of the Jacobian matrix rather than utilizing line-search or trust-region strategies. This variation switches smoothly between full Newton and Newton-like steps. In several 2D and 3D numerical examples, all of them with different characteristic features, our modified Newton solver is compared to a backtracking line-search Newton method, another line-search method monitoring the global energy and allowing for negative curvatures, and to already published results of an error-oriented version. These computations also include further modifications of Newton's method and detailed discussions why certain schemes either work or fail. Revisiting all findings, the main outcome of this paper is that the modified Newton scheme with Jacobian modification is currently the only method that works in a robust and efficient way for all provided examples, whereas line-search schemes or the error-oriented scheme show deficiencies for certain configurations.

AB - Our goal in this work is to develop and compare modified Newton methods for fully monolithic quasi-static brittle phase-field fracture propagation. In variational phase-field fracture, a smoothed phase-field indicator variable denoting the crack path is coupled to elasticity. Moreover, a crack irreversibility condition is incorporated. To develop a fully monolithic scheme is an extremely challenging task since the underlying problem is non-convex and the Jacobian of Newton's method is indefinite. To split the problem using alternating minimization, thus a partitioned approach, is a possible resort. However, there are good reasons to consider monolithic approaches such as for example robustness and efficiency. Although an error-oriented Newton method can cope with a larger variety of configurations, it appears that this method is not always robust and also not always efficient. Inspired by nonlinear flow problems, as alternative, we develop a modified Newton scheme in which globalization is based on a dynamic modification of the Jacobian matrix rather than utilizing line-search or trust-region strategies. This variation switches smoothly between full Newton and Newton-like steps. In several 2D and 3D numerical examples, all of them with different characteristic features, our modified Newton solver is compared to a backtracking line-search Newton method, another line-search method monitoring the global energy and allowing for negative curvatures, and to already published results of an error-oriented version. These computations also include further modifications of Newton's method and detailed discussions why certain schemes either work or fail. Revisiting all findings, the main outcome of this paper is that the modified Newton scheme with Jacobian modification is currently the only method that works in a robust and efficient way for all provided examples, whereas line-search schemes or the error-oriented scheme show deficiencies for certain configurations.

KW - Benchmark tests

KW - Inexact augmented Lagrangian

KW - Jacobian modification

KW - Line-search

KW - Modified Newton's method

KW - Phase-field fracture propagation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027698782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cma.2017.07.026

DO - 10.1016/j.cma.2017.07.026

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85027698782

VL - 325

SP - 577

EP - 611

JO - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

JF - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

SN - 0045-7825

ER -

By the same author(s)