Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

Modelling mathematics for educational research and practice: a comparison of two theoretical approaches

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
  • University of Copenhagen

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153–168
Number of pages16
JournalEducational studies in mathematics
Volume118
Issue number2
Early online date5 Nov 2024
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Abstract

The production and use of explicit models of mathematics are important elements of research in Didactics of Mathematics. In this paper, we present and compare two different European approaches to didactical modelling. The first, centred around the notion of basic idea (Grundvorstellung), arose in German-speaking countries as a development within Subject Matter Didactics (Stoffdidaktik). The second is the notion of praxeology from the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, which originated in France. After presenting the genesis and interpretation of these notions as theoretical modelling tools, we provide a detailed case study of actual models produced with these tools, concerning the notion of limits and derivatives. Furthermore, we identify similarities and differences of both models in how they can support didactical research and practice, for instance, by identifying important phenomena or problems. We conclude that the two approaches offer important, different and, to some extent, complementary positions and perspectives.

Keywords

    Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, Basic ideas, Networking of theoretical frameworks, Praxeologies, Subject Matter Didactics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Modelling mathematics for educational research and practice: a comparison of two theoretical approaches. / Hochmuth, Reinhard; Peters, Jana; Rønning, Frode et al.
In: Educational studies in mathematics, Vol. 118, No. 2, 02.2025, p. 153–168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Hochmuth R, Peters J, Rønning F, Winsløw C. Modelling mathematics for educational research and practice: a comparison of two theoretical approaches. Educational studies in mathematics. 2025 Feb;118(2):153–168. Epub 2024 Nov 5. doi: 10.1007/s10649-024-10368-8
Download
@article{a625b7da282c4c0eabd873dc05790a8f,
title = "Modelling mathematics for educational research and practice: a comparison of two theoretical approaches",
abstract = "The production and use of explicit models of mathematics are important elements of research in Didactics of Mathematics. In this paper, we present and compare two different European approaches to didactical modelling. The first, centred around the notion of basic idea (Grundvorstellung), arose in German-speaking countries as a development within Subject Matter Didactics (Stoffdidaktik). The second is the notion of praxeology from the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, which originated in France. After presenting the genesis and interpretation of these notions as theoretical modelling tools, we provide a detailed case study of actual models produced with these tools, concerning the notion of limits and derivatives. Furthermore, we identify similarities and differences of both models in how they can support didactical research and practice, for instance, by identifying important phenomena or problems. We conclude that the two approaches offer important, different and, to some extent, complementary positions and perspectives.",
keywords = "Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, Basic ideas, Networking of theoretical frameworks, Praxeologies, Subject Matter Didactics",
author = "Reinhard Hochmuth and Jana Peters and Frode R{\o}nning and Carl Winsl{\o}w",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",
year = "2025",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1007/s10649-024-10368-8",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "153–168",
journal = "Educational studies in mathematics",
issn = "0013-1954",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modelling mathematics for educational research and practice

T2 - a comparison of two theoretical approaches

AU - Hochmuth, Reinhard

AU - Peters, Jana

AU - Rønning, Frode

AU - Winsløw, Carl

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.

PY - 2025/2

Y1 - 2025/2

N2 - The production and use of explicit models of mathematics are important elements of research in Didactics of Mathematics. In this paper, we present and compare two different European approaches to didactical modelling. The first, centred around the notion of basic idea (Grundvorstellung), arose in German-speaking countries as a development within Subject Matter Didactics (Stoffdidaktik). The second is the notion of praxeology from the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, which originated in France. After presenting the genesis and interpretation of these notions as theoretical modelling tools, we provide a detailed case study of actual models produced with these tools, concerning the notion of limits and derivatives. Furthermore, we identify similarities and differences of both models in how they can support didactical research and practice, for instance, by identifying important phenomena or problems. We conclude that the two approaches offer important, different and, to some extent, complementary positions and perspectives.

AB - The production and use of explicit models of mathematics are important elements of research in Didactics of Mathematics. In this paper, we present and compare two different European approaches to didactical modelling. The first, centred around the notion of basic idea (Grundvorstellung), arose in German-speaking countries as a development within Subject Matter Didactics (Stoffdidaktik). The second is the notion of praxeology from the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, which originated in France. After presenting the genesis and interpretation of these notions as theoretical modelling tools, we provide a detailed case study of actual models produced with these tools, concerning the notion of limits and derivatives. Furthermore, we identify similarities and differences of both models in how they can support didactical research and practice, for instance, by identifying important phenomena or problems. We conclude that the two approaches offer important, different and, to some extent, complementary positions and perspectives.

KW - Anthropological Theory of the Didactic

KW - Basic ideas

KW - Networking of theoretical frameworks

KW - Praxeologies

KW - Subject Matter Didactics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208179277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10649-024-10368-8

DO - 10.1007/s10649-024-10368-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85208179277

VL - 118

SP - 153

EP - 168

JO - Educational studies in mathematics

JF - Educational studies in mathematics

SN - 0013-1954

IS - 2

ER -

By the same author(s)