Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1742-1749 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Combustion and Flame |
| Volume | 158 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Publication status | Published - 21 Jan 2011 |
Abstract
Recent work on reaction modelling of turbulent lean premixed combustion has shown a significant influence of the Lewis number even at high turbulence intensities, if different fuels and varied pressure is regarded. This was unexpected, as the Lewis number is based on molecular transport quantities (ratio of molecular thermal diffusivity to mass diffusivity), while highly turbulent flames are thought to be dominated from turbulent mixing and not from molecular transport. A simple physical picture allows an explanation, assuming that essentially the leading part of the wrinkled flame front determines the flame propagation and the average reaction rate, while the rear part of the flame is of reduced importance here (determining possibly the burnout process and the flame brush thickness but not the flame propagation). Following this argumentation, mostly positively curved flame elements determine the flame propagation and the average reaction rate, where the influence of the preferential molecular diffusion and the Lewis number can easily seen to be important. Additionally, an extension of this picture allows a simple derivation of an effective Lewis number relation for lean hydrogen/methane mixtures. The applicability and the limit of this concept is investigated for two sets of flames: turbulent pressurized Bunsen flames, where hydrogen content and pressure is varied (from CNRS Orléans), and highly turbulent pressurized dump combustor flames where the hydrogen content is varied (from PSI Baden). For RANS simulations, comparison of flame length data between experiment and an effective Lewis number model shows a very good agreement for all these flames with hydrogen content of the fuel up to 20. vol.%, and even rather good agreement for 30% and 40% hydrogen.
Keywords
- Combustion modelling, Effective Lewis number, Fuel mixture, Molecular transport, Turbulent premixed combustion
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Combustion and Flame, Vol. 158, No. 9, 21.01.2011, p. 1742-1749.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Modelling and simulation of lean premixed turbulent methane/hydrogen/air flames with an effective Lewis number approach
AU - Dinkelacker, F.
AU - Manickam, B.
AU - Muppala, S. P.R.
PY - 2011/1/21
Y1 - 2011/1/21
N2 - Recent work on reaction modelling of turbulent lean premixed combustion has shown a significant influence of the Lewis number even at high turbulence intensities, if different fuels and varied pressure is regarded. This was unexpected, as the Lewis number is based on molecular transport quantities (ratio of molecular thermal diffusivity to mass diffusivity), while highly turbulent flames are thought to be dominated from turbulent mixing and not from molecular transport. A simple physical picture allows an explanation, assuming that essentially the leading part of the wrinkled flame front determines the flame propagation and the average reaction rate, while the rear part of the flame is of reduced importance here (determining possibly the burnout process and the flame brush thickness but not the flame propagation). Following this argumentation, mostly positively curved flame elements determine the flame propagation and the average reaction rate, where the influence of the preferential molecular diffusion and the Lewis number can easily seen to be important. Additionally, an extension of this picture allows a simple derivation of an effective Lewis number relation for lean hydrogen/methane mixtures. The applicability and the limit of this concept is investigated for two sets of flames: turbulent pressurized Bunsen flames, where hydrogen content and pressure is varied (from CNRS Orléans), and highly turbulent pressurized dump combustor flames where the hydrogen content is varied (from PSI Baden). For RANS simulations, comparison of flame length data between experiment and an effective Lewis number model shows a very good agreement for all these flames with hydrogen content of the fuel up to 20. vol.%, and even rather good agreement for 30% and 40% hydrogen.
AB - Recent work on reaction modelling of turbulent lean premixed combustion has shown a significant influence of the Lewis number even at high turbulence intensities, if different fuels and varied pressure is regarded. This was unexpected, as the Lewis number is based on molecular transport quantities (ratio of molecular thermal diffusivity to mass diffusivity), while highly turbulent flames are thought to be dominated from turbulent mixing and not from molecular transport. A simple physical picture allows an explanation, assuming that essentially the leading part of the wrinkled flame front determines the flame propagation and the average reaction rate, while the rear part of the flame is of reduced importance here (determining possibly the burnout process and the flame brush thickness but not the flame propagation). Following this argumentation, mostly positively curved flame elements determine the flame propagation and the average reaction rate, where the influence of the preferential molecular diffusion and the Lewis number can easily seen to be important. Additionally, an extension of this picture allows a simple derivation of an effective Lewis number relation for lean hydrogen/methane mixtures. The applicability and the limit of this concept is investigated for two sets of flames: turbulent pressurized Bunsen flames, where hydrogen content and pressure is varied (from CNRS Orléans), and highly turbulent pressurized dump combustor flames where the hydrogen content is varied (from PSI Baden). For RANS simulations, comparison of flame length data between experiment and an effective Lewis number model shows a very good agreement for all these flames with hydrogen content of the fuel up to 20. vol.%, and even rather good agreement for 30% and 40% hydrogen.
KW - Combustion modelling
KW - Effective Lewis number
KW - Fuel mixture
KW - Molecular transport
KW - Turbulent premixed combustion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958126341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.12.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79958126341
VL - 158
SP - 1742
EP - 1749
JO - Combustion and Flame
JF - Combustion and Flame
SN - 0010-2180
IS - 9
ER -