Modeling Review Argumentation for Robust Sentiment Analysis

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Paderborn University
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics
Subtitle of host publicationTechnical Papers
EditorsJunichi Tsujii, Jan Hajic
Pages553-564
Number of pages12
ISBN (electronic)9781941643266
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014
Externally publishedYes
Event25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2014 - Dublin, Ireland
Duration: 23 Aug 201429 Aug 2014

Abstract

Most text classification approaches model text at the lexical and syntactic level only, lacking domain robustness and explainability. In tasks like sentiment analysis, such approaches can result in limited effectiveness if the texts to be classified consist of a series of arguments. In this paper, we claim that even a shallow model of the argumentation of a text allows for an effective and more robust classification, while providing intuitive explanations of the classification results. Here, we apply this idea to the supervised prediction of sentiment scores for reviews. We combine existing approaches from sentiment analysis with novel features that compare the overall argumentation structure of the given review text to a learned set of common sentiment flow patterns. Our evaluation in two domains demonstrates the benefit of modeling argumentation for text classification in terms of effectiveness and robustness.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Modeling Review Argumentation for Robust Sentiment Analysis. / Wachsmuth, Henning; Trenkmann, Martin; Stein, Benno et al.
Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. ed. / Junichi Tsujii; Jan Hajic. 2014. p. 553-564.

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Wachsmuth, H, Trenkmann, M, Stein, B & Engels, G 2014, Modeling Review Argumentation for Robust Sentiment Analysis. in J Tsujii & J Hajic (eds), Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. pp. 553-564, 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2014, Dublin, Ireland, 23 Aug 2014. <https://aclanthology.org/C14-1053>
Wachsmuth, H., Trenkmann, M., Stein, B., & Engels, G. (2014). Modeling Review Argumentation for Robust Sentiment Analysis. In J. Tsujii, & J. Hajic (Eds.), Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (pp. 553-564) https://aclanthology.org/C14-1053
Wachsmuth H, Trenkmann M, Stein B, Engels G. Modeling Review Argumentation for Robust Sentiment Analysis. In Tsujii J, Hajic J, editors, Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 2014. p. 553-564
Wachsmuth, Henning ; Trenkmann, Martin ; Stein, Benno et al. / Modeling Review Argumentation for Robust Sentiment Analysis. Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. editor / Junichi Tsujii ; Jan Hajic. 2014. pp. 553-564
Download
@inproceedings{861569cce8a64f01980db7a2fba6a77c,
title = "Modeling Review Argumentation for Robust Sentiment Analysis",
abstract = "Most text classification approaches model text at the lexical and syntactic level only, lacking domain robustness and explainability. In tasks like sentiment analysis, such approaches can result in limited effectiveness if the texts to be classified consist of a series of arguments. In this paper, we claim that even a shallow model of the argumentation of a text allows for an effective and more robust classification, while providing intuitive explanations of the classification results. Here, we apply this idea to the supervised prediction of sentiment scores for reviews. We combine existing approaches from sentiment analysis with novel features that compare the overall argumentation structure of the given review text to a learned set of common sentiment flow patterns. Our evaluation in two domains demonstrates the benefit of modeling argumentation for text classification in terms of effectiveness and robustness.",
author = "Henning Wachsmuth and Martin Trenkmann and Benno Stein and Gregor Engels",
year = "2014",
month = aug,
language = "English",
pages = "553--564",
editor = "Junichi Tsujii and Jan Hajic",
booktitle = "Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics",
note = "25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2014 ; Conference date: 23-08-2014 Through 29-08-2014",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Modeling Review Argumentation for Robust Sentiment Analysis

AU - Wachsmuth, Henning

AU - Trenkmann, Martin

AU - Stein, Benno

AU - Engels, Gregor

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - Most text classification approaches model text at the lexical and syntactic level only, lacking domain robustness and explainability. In tasks like sentiment analysis, such approaches can result in limited effectiveness if the texts to be classified consist of a series of arguments. In this paper, we claim that even a shallow model of the argumentation of a text allows for an effective and more robust classification, while providing intuitive explanations of the classification results. Here, we apply this idea to the supervised prediction of sentiment scores for reviews. We combine existing approaches from sentiment analysis with novel features that compare the overall argumentation structure of the given review text to a learned set of common sentiment flow patterns. Our evaluation in two domains demonstrates the benefit of modeling argumentation for text classification in terms of effectiveness and robustness.

AB - Most text classification approaches model text at the lexical and syntactic level only, lacking domain robustness and explainability. In tasks like sentiment analysis, such approaches can result in limited effectiveness if the texts to be classified consist of a series of arguments. In this paper, we claim that even a shallow model of the argumentation of a text allows for an effective and more robust classification, while providing intuitive explanations of the classification results. Here, we apply this idea to the supervised prediction of sentiment scores for reviews. We combine existing approaches from sentiment analysis with novel features that compare the overall argumentation structure of the given review text to a learned set of common sentiment flow patterns. Our evaluation in two domains demonstrates the benefit of modeling argumentation for text classification in terms of effectiveness and robustness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938105825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84938105825

SP - 553

EP - 564

BT - Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics

A2 - Tsujii, Junichi

A2 - Hajic, Jan

T2 - 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2014

Y2 - 23 August 2014 through 29 August 2014

ER -

By the same author(s)