Modeling N fertilization impact on water cycle and water use efficiency of maize, finger-millet, and lablab crops in South India

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Albara Almawazreh
  • Daniel Uteau
  • C. T. Subbarayappa
  • Andreas Buerkert
  • Sybille Lehmann
  • Stephan Peth

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • University of Kassel
  • University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere20319
JournalVadose zone journal
Volume23
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 12 May 2024

Abstract

The understanding of the impact of nitrogen (N) fertilization on the field water cycle and corresponding water use efficiency (WUE) is very important for optimizing fertilization rates and conserving stressed water resources. We modeled soil moisture dynamics of maize (Zea mays L.), finger millet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.), and lablab [Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet] plots using calibrated HYDRUS-1D model on two experimental sites (rain-fed and irrigated) for three seasons under different N treatments. The results indicate that the effects of N depended on plant specific properties such as N-fixation and drought tolerance, and on plant available water content governed by soil structure and rainfall seasonal variability. Maize WUE of plots which received 150 kg/ha of urea (46 (Formula presented.) N) were 10–30 kg/ha/mm higher than plots which received none; likewise, millet that received 50 kg/ha of urea had a 7–10 kg/ha/mm higher WUE than control plots in both experiments. However, differences in water cycle components were noticeable between N treatments only in the rain-fed experiment, where higher N levels led to around 60 and 30 mm higher transpiration, 30 and 20 mm lower evaporation, and 30 and 15 mm lower percolation per season for maize and millet, respectively. In 2018, which was the driest year, the difference in maize WUE between the high and low N treatments was only 1 kg/ha/mm, which corresponded with low actual to potential transpiration ratios ((Formula presented.)). This indicates higher sensitivity of maize to water stress compared to the other crops. The results of lablab indicate a positive impact of N fertilization on WUE only under water-limited conditions.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Modeling N fertilization impact on water cycle and water use efficiency of maize, finger-millet, and lablab crops in South India. / Almawazreh, Albara; Uteau, Daniel; Subbarayappa, C. T. et al.
In: Vadose zone journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, e20319, 12.05.2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Almawazreh A, Uteau D, Subbarayappa CT, Buerkert A, Lehmann S, Peth S. Modeling N fertilization impact on water cycle and water use efficiency of maize, finger-millet, and lablab crops in South India. Vadose zone journal. 2024 May 12;23(3):e20319. doi: 10.1002/vzj2.20319, 10.15488/17232
Download
@article{5da6fcaced3c41dc941c5398a35f4b23,
title = "Modeling N fertilization impact on water cycle and water use efficiency of maize, finger-millet, and lablab crops in South India",
abstract = "The understanding of the impact of nitrogen (N) fertilization on the field water cycle and corresponding water use efficiency (WUE) is very important for optimizing fertilization rates and conserving stressed water resources. We modeled soil moisture dynamics of maize (Zea mays L.), finger millet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.), and lablab [Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet] plots using calibrated HYDRUS-1D model on two experimental sites (rain-fed and irrigated) for three seasons under different N treatments. The results indicate that the effects of N depended on plant specific properties such as N-fixation and drought tolerance, and on plant available water content governed by soil structure and rainfall seasonal variability. Maize WUE of plots which received 150 kg/ha of urea (46 (Formula presented.) N) were 10–30 kg/ha/mm higher than plots which received none; likewise, millet that received 50 kg/ha of urea had a 7–10 kg/ha/mm higher WUE than control plots in both experiments. However, differences in water cycle components were noticeable between N treatments only in the rain-fed experiment, where higher N levels led to around 60 and 30 mm higher transpiration, 30 and 20 mm lower evaporation, and 30 and 15 mm lower percolation per season for maize and millet, respectively. In 2018, which was the driest year, the difference in maize WUE between the high and low N treatments was only 1 kg/ha/mm, which corresponded with low actual to potential transpiration ratios ((Formula presented.)). This indicates higher sensitivity of maize to water stress compared to the other crops. The results of lablab indicate a positive impact of N fertilization on WUE only under water-limited conditions.",
author = "Albara Almawazreh and Daniel Uteau and Subbarayappa, {C. T.} and Andreas Buerkert and Sybille Lehmann and Stephan Peth",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors. Vadose Zone Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Soil Science Society of America.",
year = "2024",
month = may,
day = "12",
doi = "10.1002/vzj2.20319",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
journal = "Vadose zone journal",
issn = "1539-1663",
publisher = "Soil Science Society of America",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling N fertilization impact on water cycle and water use efficiency of maize, finger-millet, and lablab crops in South India

AU - Almawazreh, Albara

AU - Uteau, Daniel

AU - Subbarayappa, C. T.

AU - Buerkert, Andreas

AU - Lehmann, Sybille

AU - Peth, Stephan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors. Vadose Zone Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Soil Science Society of America.

PY - 2024/5/12

Y1 - 2024/5/12

N2 - The understanding of the impact of nitrogen (N) fertilization on the field water cycle and corresponding water use efficiency (WUE) is very important for optimizing fertilization rates and conserving stressed water resources. We modeled soil moisture dynamics of maize (Zea mays L.), finger millet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.), and lablab [Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet] plots using calibrated HYDRUS-1D model on two experimental sites (rain-fed and irrigated) for three seasons under different N treatments. The results indicate that the effects of N depended on plant specific properties such as N-fixation and drought tolerance, and on plant available water content governed by soil structure and rainfall seasonal variability. Maize WUE of plots which received 150 kg/ha of urea (46 (Formula presented.) N) were 10–30 kg/ha/mm higher than plots which received none; likewise, millet that received 50 kg/ha of urea had a 7–10 kg/ha/mm higher WUE than control plots in both experiments. However, differences in water cycle components were noticeable between N treatments only in the rain-fed experiment, where higher N levels led to around 60 and 30 mm higher transpiration, 30 and 20 mm lower evaporation, and 30 and 15 mm lower percolation per season for maize and millet, respectively. In 2018, which was the driest year, the difference in maize WUE between the high and low N treatments was only 1 kg/ha/mm, which corresponded with low actual to potential transpiration ratios ((Formula presented.)). This indicates higher sensitivity of maize to water stress compared to the other crops. The results of lablab indicate a positive impact of N fertilization on WUE only under water-limited conditions.

AB - The understanding of the impact of nitrogen (N) fertilization on the field water cycle and corresponding water use efficiency (WUE) is very important for optimizing fertilization rates and conserving stressed water resources. We modeled soil moisture dynamics of maize (Zea mays L.), finger millet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.), and lablab [Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet] plots using calibrated HYDRUS-1D model on two experimental sites (rain-fed and irrigated) for three seasons under different N treatments. The results indicate that the effects of N depended on plant specific properties such as N-fixation and drought tolerance, and on plant available water content governed by soil structure and rainfall seasonal variability. Maize WUE of plots which received 150 kg/ha of urea (46 (Formula presented.) N) were 10–30 kg/ha/mm higher than plots which received none; likewise, millet that received 50 kg/ha of urea had a 7–10 kg/ha/mm higher WUE than control plots in both experiments. However, differences in water cycle components were noticeable between N treatments only in the rain-fed experiment, where higher N levels led to around 60 and 30 mm higher transpiration, 30 and 20 mm lower evaporation, and 30 and 15 mm lower percolation per season for maize and millet, respectively. In 2018, which was the driest year, the difference in maize WUE between the high and low N treatments was only 1 kg/ha/mm, which corresponded with low actual to potential transpiration ratios ((Formula presented.)). This indicates higher sensitivity of maize to water stress compared to the other crops. The results of lablab indicate a positive impact of N fertilization on WUE only under water-limited conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188438217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/vzj2.20319

DO - 10.1002/vzj2.20319

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85188438217

VL - 23

JO - Vadose zone journal

JF - Vadose zone journal

SN - 1539-1663

IS - 3

M1 - e20319

ER -

By the same author(s)