Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 35855-35868 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Ceramics international |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 19, Part B |
Early online date | 2 Jul 2024 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2024 |
Abstract
The geopolymerization reaction is a chemical process involving the dissolution of amorphous, semi-crystalline and crystalline phases following alkaline or acid attack at ambient or at low temperature (T˂100 °C). Together with precondensed entities of the used activator solution the dissolved parts form a geopolymer network which glues together all remaining unreacted parts as ingredients of the artificial stone. The fate of the mineralogical phases present in the precursors used in the synthesis of alkaline and acid geopolymers is reviewed in this article. The different starting materials used in the synthesis of geopolymers and the different techniques used to modify the reactivity of these materials are reported. The mineralogical evolution of the amorphous, semi-crystalline and crystalline phases after activation at ambient and at low temperatures (T < 100 °C) is also reported. This study shows that for the mineralogical investigation of raw material, precursors and geopolymers, XRD is the most widely used analytical method. The most commonly used method to confirm the participation of crystalline phases in geopolymerization is the comparison of the diffractograms of the raw material to those of the products. It also indicates that, in addition to the amorphous aluminosilicate phases, certain semi-crystalline, and crystalline phases participate in this geopolymerization dynamic either by undergoing total or partial dissolution to form an inorganic macromolecule with an amorphous structure of the zeolitic type and other new minerals. The composition of the phases formed depends on the base material. Increasing the synthesis temperature promotes the dissolution of phases, the formation of geopolymer networks, and in some cases, the formation of new phases such as sodalities, zeolite A and zeolite P. Little work has been done to quantify the mineralogical phases before and after precursor activation, making it impossible to assess dissolution, the degree of geopolymerization, and mineral formation. The exact structure of the phases formed is often questionable, as most of the papers do not mention their reference structure number. There is also a lack of quantification of the amorphous phase resulting from the hardening of the activating solution and the evaluation of the fraction of the amorphous phase contained in the precursor remains unreacted. The mineralogical investigation must also extend to the quantification of phases using Rietveld refinement with internal standards to correlate these with the physical and mechanical properties of geopolymer products. Additional mineralogical study techniques, such as thin sections, should be used in future work for in-depth mineralogical investigation of geopolymers.
Keywords
- Activation, Dissolution, Geopolymerization, Minerals, New minerals, Precursor
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Materials Science(all)
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Materials Science(all)
- Ceramics and Composites
- Chemical Engineering(all)
- Process Chemistry and Technology
- Materials Science(all)
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films
- Materials Science(all)
- Materials Chemistry
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Ceramics international, Vol. 50, No. 19, Part B, 01.10.2024, p. 35855-35868.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Mineralogical evolution of raw materials transformed to geopolymer materials
T2 - A review
AU - Tome, Sylvain
AU - Nana, Achile
AU - Tchakouté, Hervé K.
AU - Temuujin, Jadambaa
AU - Rüscher, Claus H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/10/1
Y1 - 2024/10/1
N2 - The geopolymerization reaction is a chemical process involving the dissolution of amorphous, semi-crystalline and crystalline phases following alkaline or acid attack at ambient or at low temperature (T˂100 °C). Together with precondensed entities of the used activator solution the dissolved parts form a geopolymer network which glues together all remaining unreacted parts as ingredients of the artificial stone. The fate of the mineralogical phases present in the precursors used in the synthesis of alkaline and acid geopolymers is reviewed in this article. The different starting materials used in the synthesis of geopolymers and the different techniques used to modify the reactivity of these materials are reported. The mineralogical evolution of the amorphous, semi-crystalline and crystalline phases after activation at ambient and at low temperatures (T < 100 °C) is also reported. This study shows that for the mineralogical investigation of raw material, precursors and geopolymers, XRD is the most widely used analytical method. The most commonly used method to confirm the participation of crystalline phases in geopolymerization is the comparison of the diffractograms of the raw material to those of the products. It also indicates that, in addition to the amorphous aluminosilicate phases, certain semi-crystalline, and crystalline phases participate in this geopolymerization dynamic either by undergoing total or partial dissolution to form an inorganic macromolecule with an amorphous structure of the zeolitic type and other new minerals. The composition of the phases formed depends on the base material. Increasing the synthesis temperature promotes the dissolution of phases, the formation of geopolymer networks, and in some cases, the formation of new phases such as sodalities, zeolite A and zeolite P. Little work has been done to quantify the mineralogical phases before and after precursor activation, making it impossible to assess dissolution, the degree of geopolymerization, and mineral formation. The exact structure of the phases formed is often questionable, as most of the papers do not mention their reference structure number. There is also a lack of quantification of the amorphous phase resulting from the hardening of the activating solution and the evaluation of the fraction of the amorphous phase contained in the precursor remains unreacted. The mineralogical investigation must also extend to the quantification of phases using Rietveld refinement with internal standards to correlate these with the physical and mechanical properties of geopolymer products. Additional mineralogical study techniques, such as thin sections, should be used in future work for in-depth mineralogical investigation of geopolymers.
AB - The geopolymerization reaction is a chemical process involving the dissolution of amorphous, semi-crystalline and crystalline phases following alkaline or acid attack at ambient or at low temperature (T˂100 °C). Together with precondensed entities of the used activator solution the dissolved parts form a geopolymer network which glues together all remaining unreacted parts as ingredients of the artificial stone. The fate of the mineralogical phases present in the precursors used in the synthesis of alkaline and acid geopolymers is reviewed in this article. The different starting materials used in the synthesis of geopolymers and the different techniques used to modify the reactivity of these materials are reported. The mineralogical evolution of the amorphous, semi-crystalline and crystalline phases after activation at ambient and at low temperatures (T < 100 °C) is also reported. This study shows that for the mineralogical investigation of raw material, precursors and geopolymers, XRD is the most widely used analytical method. The most commonly used method to confirm the participation of crystalline phases in geopolymerization is the comparison of the diffractograms of the raw material to those of the products. It also indicates that, in addition to the amorphous aluminosilicate phases, certain semi-crystalline, and crystalline phases participate in this geopolymerization dynamic either by undergoing total or partial dissolution to form an inorganic macromolecule with an amorphous structure of the zeolitic type and other new minerals. The composition of the phases formed depends on the base material. Increasing the synthesis temperature promotes the dissolution of phases, the formation of geopolymer networks, and in some cases, the formation of new phases such as sodalities, zeolite A and zeolite P. Little work has been done to quantify the mineralogical phases before and after precursor activation, making it impossible to assess dissolution, the degree of geopolymerization, and mineral formation. The exact structure of the phases formed is often questionable, as most of the papers do not mention their reference structure number. There is also a lack of quantification of the amorphous phase resulting from the hardening of the activating solution and the evaluation of the fraction of the amorphous phase contained in the precursor remains unreacted. The mineralogical investigation must also extend to the quantification of phases using Rietveld refinement with internal standards to correlate these with the physical and mechanical properties of geopolymer products. Additional mineralogical study techniques, such as thin sections, should be used in future work for in-depth mineralogical investigation of geopolymers.
KW - Activation
KW - Dissolution
KW - Geopolymerization
KW - Minerals
KW - New minerals
KW - Precursor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198166431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.024
DO - 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.024
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85198166431
VL - 50
SP - 35855
EP - 35868
JO - Ceramics international
JF - Ceramics international
SN - 0272-8842
IS - 19, Part B
ER -