Mechanism of Uranium Reduction and Immobilization in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Biofilms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Malgorzata Stylo
  • Nadja Neubert
  • Yvonne Roebbert
  • Stefan Weyer
  • Rizlan Bernier-Latmani

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10553-10561
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume49
Issue number17
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2015

Abstract

The prevalent formation of noncrystalline U(IV) species in the subsurface and their enhanced susceptibility to reoxidation and remobilization, as compared to crystalline uraninite, raise concerns about the long-term sustainability of the bioremediation of U-contaminated sites. The main goal of this study was to resolve the remaining uncertainty concerning the formation mechanism of noncrystalline U(IV) in the environment. Controlled laboratory biofilm systems (biotic, abiotic, and mixed biotic-abiotic) were probed using a combination of U isotope fractionation and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Regardless of the mechanism of U reduction, the presence of a biofilm resulted in the formation of noncrystalline U(IV). Our results also show that biotic U reduction is the most effective way to immobilize and reduce U. However, the mixed biotic-abiotic system resembled more closely an abiotic system: (i) the U(IV) solid phase lacked a typically biotic isotope signature and (ii) elemental sulfur was detected, which indicates the oxidation of sulfide coupled to U(VI) reduction. The predominance of abiotic U reduction in our systems is due to the lack of available aqueous U(VI) species for direct enzymatic reduction. In contrast, in cases where bicarbonate is present at a higher concentration, aqueous U(VI) species dominate, allowing biotic U reduction to outcompete the abiotic processes. (Figure Presented).

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Mechanism of Uranium Reduction and Immobilization in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Biofilms. / Stylo, Malgorzata; Neubert, Nadja; Roebbert, Yvonne et al.
In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 49, No. 17, 01.09.2015, p. 10553-10561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Stylo M, Neubert N, Roebbert Y, Weyer S, Bernier-Latmani R. Mechanism of Uranium Reduction and Immobilization in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Biofilms. Environmental Science and Technology. 2015 Sept 1;49(17):10553-10561. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01769
Stylo, Malgorzata ; Neubert, Nadja ; Roebbert, Yvonne et al. / Mechanism of Uranium Reduction and Immobilization in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Biofilms. In: Environmental Science and Technology. 2015 ; Vol. 49, No. 17. pp. 10553-10561.
Download
@article{fdc63e9f19004651a5103b86dbd2af93,
title = "Mechanism of Uranium Reduction and Immobilization in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Biofilms",
abstract = "The prevalent formation of noncrystalline U(IV) species in the subsurface and their enhanced susceptibility to reoxidation and remobilization, as compared to crystalline uraninite, raise concerns about the long-term sustainability of the bioremediation of U-contaminated sites. The main goal of this study was to resolve the remaining uncertainty concerning the formation mechanism of noncrystalline U(IV) in the environment. Controlled laboratory biofilm systems (biotic, abiotic, and mixed biotic-abiotic) were probed using a combination of U isotope fractionation and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Regardless of the mechanism of U reduction, the presence of a biofilm resulted in the formation of noncrystalline U(IV). Our results also show that biotic U reduction is the most effective way to immobilize and reduce U. However, the mixed biotic-abiotic system resembled more closely an abiotic system: (i) the U(IV) solid phase lacked a typically biotic isotope signature and (ii) elemental sulfur was detected, which indicates the oxidation of sulfide coupled to U(VI) reduction. The predominance of abiotic U reduction in our systems is due to the lack of available aqueous U(VI) species for direct enzymatic reduction. In contrast, in cases where bicarbonate is present at a higher concentration, aqueous U(VI) species dominate, allowing biotic U reduction to outcompete the abiotic processes. (Figure Presented).",
author = "Malgorzata Stylo and Nadja Neubert and Yvonne Roebbert and Stefan Weyer and Rizlan Bernier-Latmani",
year = "2015",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1021/acs.est.5b01769",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "10553--10561",
journal = "Environmental Science and Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "17",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanism of Uranium Reduction and Immobilization in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Biofilms

AU - Stylo, Malgorzata

AU - Neubert, Nadja

AU - Roebbert, Yvonne

AU - Weyer, Stefan

AU - Bernier-Latmani, Rizlan

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - The prevalent formation of noncrystalline U(IV) species in the subsurface and their enhanced susceptibility to reoxidation and remobilization, as compared to crystalline uraninite, raise concerns about the long-term sustainability of the bioremediation of U-contaminated sites. The main goal of this study was to resolve the remaining uncertainty concerning the formation mechanism of noncrystalline U(IV) in the environment. Controlled laboratory biofilm systems (biotic, abiotic, and mixed biotic-abiotic) were probed using a combination of U isotope fractionation and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Regardless of the mechanism of U reduction, the presence of a biofilm resulted in the formation of noncrystalline U(IV). Our results also show that biotic U reduction is the most effective way to immobilize and reduce U. However, the mixed biotic-abiotic system resembled more closely an abiotic system: (i) the U(IV) solid phase lacked a typically biotic isotope signature and (ii) elemental sulfur was detected, which indicates the oxidation of sulfide coupled to U(VI) reduction. The predominance of abiotic U reduction in our systems is due to the lack of available aqueous U(VI) species for direct enzymatic reduction. In contrast, in cases where bicarbonate is present at a higher concentration, aqueous U(VI) species dominate, allowing biotic U reduction to outcompete the abiotic processes. (Figure Presented).

AB - The prevalent formation of noncrystalline U(IV) species in the subsurface and their enhanced susceptibility to reoxidation and remobilization, as compared to crystalline uraninite, raise concerns about the long-term sustainability of the bioremediation of U-contaminated sites. The main goal of this study was to resolve the remaining uncertainty concerning the formation mechanism of noncrystalline U(IV) in the environment. Controlled laboratory biofilm systems (biotic, abiotic, and mixed biotic-abiotic) were probed using a combination of U isotope fractionation and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Regardless of the mechanism of U reduction, the presence of a biofilm resulted in the formation of noncrystalline U(IV). Our results also show that biotic U reduction is the most effective way to immobilize and reduce U. However, the mixed biotic-abiotic system resembled more closely an abiotic system: (i) the U(IV) solid phase lacked a typically biotic isotope signature and (ii) elemental sulfur was detected, which indicates the oxidation of sulfide coupled to U(VI) reduction. The predominance of abiotic U reduction in our systems is due to the lack of available aqueous U(VI) species for direct enzymatic reduction. In contrast, in cases where bicarbonate is present at a higher concentration, aqueous U(VI) species dominate, allowing biotic U reduction to outcompete the abiotic processes. (Figure Presented).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940853021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.5b01769

DO - 10.1021/acs.est.5b01769

M3 - Article

C2 - 26251962

AN - SCOPUS:84940853021

VL - 49

SP - 10553

EP - 10561

JO - Environmental Science and Technology

JF - Environmental Science and Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 17

ER -

By the same author(s)