Measures of Systemic Risk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Zachary Feinstein
  • Birgit Rudloff
  • Stefan Weber
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)672-708
Number of pages37
JournalSIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics
Volume8
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Abstract

Systemic risk refers to the risk that the financial system is susceptible to failures due to the characteristics of the system itself. The tremendous cost of systemic risk requires the design and implementation of tools for the eficient macroprudential regulation of financial institutions. The current paper proposes a novel approach to measuring systemic risk. Key to our construction is a rigorous derivation of systemic risk measures from the structure of the underlying system and the objectives of a financial regulator. The suggested systemic risk measures express systemic risk in terms of capital endowments of the financial firms. Their definition requires two ingredients: A cash ow or value model that assigns to the capital allocations of the entities in the system a relevant stochastic outcome; and an acceptability criterion, i.e., a set of random outcomes that are acceptable to a regulatory authority. Systemic risk is measured by the set of allocations of additional capital that lead to acceptable outcomes. We explain the conceptual framework and the definition of systemic risk measures, provide an algorithm for their computation, and illustrate their application in numerical case studies. Many systemic risk measures in the literature can be viewed as the minimal amount of capital that is needed to make the system acceptable after aggregating individual risks, hence quantify the costs of a bail out. In contrast, our approach emphasizes operational systemic risk measures that include both ex-post-bailout costs as well as ex-Ante-capital requirements and may be used to prevent systemic crises.

Keywords

    Capital regulation, Financial contagion, Monetary risk measures, Set-valued risk measures, Systemic risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Measures of Systemic Risk. / Feinstein, Zachary; Rudloff, Birgit; Weber, Stefan.
In: SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.2017, p. 672-708.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Feinstein, Z, Rudloff, B & Weber, S 2017, 'Measures of Systemic Risk', SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 672-708. https://doi.org/10.1137/16m1066087
Feinstein, Z., Rudloff, B., & Weber, S. (2017). Measures of Systemic Risk. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 8(1), 672-708. https://doi.org/10.1137/16m1066087
Feinstein Z, Rudloff B, Weber S. Measures of Systemic Risk. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics. 2017 Jan;8(1):672-708. doi: 10.1137/16m1066087
Feinstein, Zachary ; Rudloff, Birgit ; Weber, Stefan. / Measures of Systemic Risk. In: SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 672-708.
Download
@article{cef3c154046c4570b378cc9b9272ec07,
title = "Measures of Systemic Risk",
abstract = "Systemic risk refers to the risk that the financial system is susceptible to failures due to the characteristics of the system itself. The tremendous cost of systemic risk requires the design and implementation of tools for the eficient macroprudential regulation of financial institutions. The current paper proposes a novel approach to measuring systemic risk. Key to our construction is a rigorous derivation of systemic risk measures from the structure of the underlying system and the objectives of a financial regulator. The suggested systemic risk measures express systemic risk in terms of capital endowments of the financial firms. Their definition requires two ingredients: A cash ow or value model that assigns to the capital allocations of the entities in the system a relevant stochastic outcome; and an acceptability criterion, i.e., a set of random outcomes that are acceptable to a regulatory authority. Systemic risk is measured by the set of allocations of additional capital that lead to acceptable outcomes. We explain the conceptual framework and the definition of systemic risk measures, provide an algorithm for their computation, and illustrate their application in numerical case studies. Many systemic risk measures in the literature can be viewed as the minimal amount of capital that is needed to make the system acceptable after aggregating individual risks, hence quantify the costs of a bail out. In contrast, our approach emphasizes operational systemic risk measures that include both ex-post-bailout costs as well as ex-Ante-capital requirements and may be used to prevent systemic crises.",
keywords = "Capital regulation, Financial contagion, Monetary risk measures, Set-valued risk measures, Systemic risk",
author = "Zachary Feinstein and Birgit Rudloff and Stefan Weber",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1137/16m1066087",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "672--708",
journal = "SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics",
issn = "1945-497X",
publisher = "Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Publications",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measures of Systemic Risk

AU - Feinstein, Zachary

AU - Rudloff, Birgit

AU - Weber, Stefan

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Systemic risk refers to the risk that the financial system is susceptible to failures due to the characteristics of the system itself. The tremendous cost of systemic risk requires the design and implementation of tools for the eficient macroprudential regulation of financial institutions. The current paper proposes a novel approach to measuring systemic risk. Key to our construction is a rigorous derivation of systemic risk measures from the structure of the underlying system and the objectives of a financial regulator. The suggested systemic risk measures express systemic risk in terms of capital endowments of the financial firms. Their definition requires two ingredients: A cash ow or value model that assigns to the capital allocations of the entities in the system a relevant stochastic outcome; and an acceptability criterion, i.e., a set of random outcomes that are acceptable to a regulatory authority. Systemic risk is measured by the set of allocations of additional capital that lead to acceptable outcomes. We explain the conceptual framework and the definition of systemic risk measures, provide an algorithm for their computation, and illustrate their application in numerical case studies. Many systemic risk measures in the literature can be viewed as the minimal amount of capital that is needed to make the system acceptable after aggregating individual risks, hence quantify the costs of a bail out. In contrast, our approach emphasizes operational systemic risk measures that include both ex-post-bailout costs as well as ex-Ante-capital requirements and may be used to prevent systemic crises.

AB - Systemic risk refers to the risk that the financial system is susceptible to failures due to the characteristics of the system itself. The tremendous cost of systemic risk requires the design and implementation of tools for the eficient macroprudential regulation of financial institutions. The current paper proposes a novel approach to measuring systemic risk. Key to our construction is a rigorous derivation of systemic risk measures from the structure of the underlying system and the objectives of a financial regulator. The suggested systemic risk measures express systemic risk in terms of capital endowments of the financial firms. Their definition requires two ingredients: A cash ow or value model that assigns to the capital allocations of the entities in the system a relevant stochastic outcome; and an acceptability criterion, i.e., a set of random outcomes that are acceptable to a regulatory authority. Systemic risk is measured by the set of allocations of additional capital that lead to acceptable outcomes. We explain the conceptual framework and the definition of systemic risk measures, provide an algorithm for their computation, and illustrate their application in numerical case studies. Many systemic risk measures in the literature can be viewed as the minimal amount of capital that is needed to make the system acceptable after aggregating individual risks, hence quantify the costs of a bail out. In contrast, our approach emphasizes operational systemic risk measures that include both ex-post-bailout costs as well as ex-Ante-capital requirements and may be used to prevent systemic crises.

KW - Capital regulation

KW - Financial contagion

KW - Monetary risk measures

KW - Set-valued risk measures

KW - Systemic risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041564382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1137/16m1066087

DO - 10.1137/16m1066087

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 672

EP - 708

JO - SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics

JF - SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics

SN - 1945-497X

IS - 1

ER -