Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 114-124 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics |
| Volume | 63 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2016 |
Abstract
We introduce an experimental setup to elicit subjects' materialistic, pro-social, and anti-social preferences. We find one third of the population exhibits mixed social preferences, choosing to give, to destroy, and to keep some payoffs. Most others are either materialistic, keeping all payoffs, or pro-social, giving some and keeping some, but not destroying payoffs. For individuals with mixed social preferences, giving and destruction are positively correlated, but do not seem to be influenced by payoff comparisons. We find that full information and experimenter demand may increase the extent of pro-social preferences, but do not affect the extent of anti-social preferences or the distribution of social types in the population.
Keywords
- Altruism, Fairness, Giving and destruction, Joy of destruction, Other-regarding behavior, Spite
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychology(all)
- Applied Psychology
- Social Sciences(all)
- General Social Sciences
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
- Economics and Econometrics
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 63, 01.08.2016, p. 114-124.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Materialistic, pro-social, anti-social, or mixed - A within-subject examination of self- and other-regarding preferences
AU - Sadrieh, Abdolkarim
AU - Schröder, Marina
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - We introduce an experimental setup to elicit subjects' materialistic, pro-social, and anti-social preferences. We find one third of the population exhibits mixed social preferences, choosing to give, to destroy, and to keep some payoffs. Most others are either materialistic, keeping all payoffs, or pro-social, giving some and keeping some, but not destroying payoffs. For individuals with mixed social preferences, giving and destruction are positively correlated, but do not seem to be influenced by payoff comparisons. We find that full information and experimenter demand may increase the extent of pro-social preferences, but do not affect the extent of anti-social preferences or the distribution of social types in the population.
AB - We introduce an experimental setup to elicit subjects' materialistic, pro-social, and anti-social preferences. We find one third of the population exhibits mixed social preferences, choosing to give, to destroy, and to keep some payoffs. Most others are either materialistic, keeping all payoffs, or pro-social, giving some and keeping some, but not destroying payoffs. For individuals with mixed social preferences, giving and destruction are positively correlated, but do not seem to be influenced by payoff comparisons. We find that full information and experimenter demand may increase the extent of pro-social preferences, but do not affect the extent of anti-social preferences or the distribution of social types in the population.
KW - Altruism
KW - Fairness
KW - Giving and destruction
KW - Joy of destruction
KW - Other-regarding behavior
KW - Spite
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974593572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.socec.2016.05.009
DO - 10.1016/j.socec.2016.05.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84974593572
VL - 63
SP - 114
EP - 124
JO - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
JF - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
SN - 2214-8043
ER -