Materialistic, pro-social, anti-social, or mixed - A within-subject examination of self- and other-regarding preferences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
  • University of Cologne
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-124
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Volume63
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

Abstract

We introduce an experimental setup to elicit subjects' materialistic, pro-social, and anti-social preferences. We find one third of the population exhibits mixed social preferences, choosing to give, to destroy, and to keep some payoffs. Most others are either materialistic, keeping all payoffs, or pro-social, giving some and keeping some, but not destroying payoffs. For individuals with mixed social preferences, giving and destruction are positively correlated, but do not seem to be influenced by payoff comparisons. We find that full information and experimenter demand may increase the extent of pro-social preferences, but do not affect the extent of anti-social preferences or the distribution of social types in the population.

Keywords

    Altruism, Fairness, Giving and destruction, Joy of destruction, Other-regarding behavior, Spite

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Materialistic, pro-social, anti-social, or mixed - A within-subject examination of self- and other-regarding preferences. / Sadrieh, Abdolkarim; Schröder, Marina.
In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 63, 01.08.2016, p. 114-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{d10aa5386784430ca440ddfd03f5f370,
title = "Materialistic, pro-social, anti-social, or mixed - A within-subject examination of self- and other-regarding preferences",
abstract = "We introduce an experimental setup to elicit subjects' materialistic, pro-social, and anti-social preferences. We find one third of the population exhibits mixed social preferences, choosing to give, to destroy, and to keep some payoffs. Most others are either materialistic, keeping all payoffs, or pro-social, giving some and keeping some, but not destroying payoffs. For individuals with mixed social preferences, giving and destruction are positively correlated, but do not seem to be influenced by payoff comparisons. We find that full information and experimenter demand may increase the extent of pro-social preferences, but do not affect the extent of anti-social preferences or the distribution of social types in the population.",
keywords = "Altruism, Fairness, Giving and destruction, Joy of destruction, Other-regarding behavior, Spite",
author = "Abdolkarim Sadrieh and Marina Schr{\"o}der",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Elsevier Inc.",
year = "2016",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socec.2016.05.009",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "114--124",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics",
issn = "2214-8043",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Materialistic, pro-social, anti-social, or mixed - A within-subject examination of self- and other-regarding preferences

AU - Sadrieh, Abdolkarim

AU - Schröder, Marina

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Elsevier Inc.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - We introduce an experimental setup to elicit subjects' materialistic, pro-social, and anti-social preferences. We find one third of the population exhibits mixed social preferences, choosing to give, to destroy, and to keep some payoffs. Most others are either materialistic, keeping all payoffs, or pro-social, giving some and keeping some, but not destroying payoffs. For individuals with mixed social preferences, giving and destruction are positively correlated, but do not seem to be influenced by payoff comparisons. We find that full information and experimenter demand may increase the extent of pro-social preferences, but do not affect the extent of anti-social preferences or the distribution of social types in the population.

AB - We introduce an experimental setup to elicit subjects' materialistic, pro-social, and anti-social preferences. We find one third of the population exhibits mixed social preferences, choosing to give, to destroy, and to keep some payoffs. Most others are either materialistic, keeping all payoffs, or pro-social, giving some and keeping some, but not destroying payoffs. For individuals with mixed social preferences, giving and destruction are positively correlated, but do not seem to be influenced by payoff comparisons. We find that full information and experimenter demand may increase the extent of pro-social preferences, but do not affect the extent of anti-social preferences or the distribution of social types in the population.

KW - Altruism

KW - Fairness

KW - Giving and destruction

KW - Joy of destruction

KW - Other-regarding behavior

KW - Spite

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974593572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socec.2016.05.009

DO - 10.1016/j.socec.2016.05.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84974593572

VL - 63

SP - 114

EP - 124

JO - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics

JF - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics

SN - 2214-8043

ER -

By the same author(s)