Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 101-116 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Biometrical journal |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Jan 2002 |
Abstract
CHEUNG and HOLLAND (1992) extended Dunnett's procedure for comparing all active treatments with a control simultaneously within each of r groups while maintaining the Type I error rate at some designated level α allowing different sample sizes for each of the group-treatment categories. This paper shows that exact percentage points can be easily calculated with current available statistical software (SAS). This procedure is compared to resampling techniques and a Bonferroni corrected Dunnett-with-in-group procedure by means of a simulation study.
Keywords
- Comparisons with a control, Resampling Techniques, Stratified Design
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Mathematics(all)
- Statistics and Probability
- Decision Sciences(all)
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Biometrical journal, Vol. 44, No. 1, 23.01.2002, p. 101-116.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Many-to-one comparisons in stratified designs
AU - Biesheuvel, Egbert
AU - Hothorn, Ludwig A.
PY - 2002/1/23
Y1 - 2002/1/23
N2 - CHEUNG and HOLLAND (1992) extended Dunnett's procedure for comparing all active treatments with a control simultaneously within each of r groups while maintaining the Type I error rate at some designated level α allowing different sample sizes for each of the group-treatment categories. This paper shows that exact percentage points can be easily calculated with current available statistical software (SAS). This procedure is compared to resampling techniques and a Bonferroni corrected Dunnett-with-in-group procedure by means of a simulation study.
AB - CHEUNG and HOLLAND (1992) extended Dunnett's procedure for comparing all active treatments with a control simultaneously within each of r groups while maintaining the Type I error rate at some designated level α allowing different sample sizes for each of the group-treatment categories. This paper shows that exact percentage points can be easily calculated with current available statistical software (SAS). This procedure is compared to resampling techniques and a Bonferroni corrected Dunnett-with-in-group procedure by means of a simulation study.
KW - Comparisons with a control
KW - Resampling Techniques
KW - Stratified Design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036002840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/1521-4036(200201)44:1<101::AID-BIMJ101>3.0.CO;2-H
DO - 10.1002/1521-4036(200201)44:1<101::AID-BIMJ101>3.0.CO;2-H
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036002840
VL - 44
SP - 101
EP - 116
JO - Biometrical journal
JF - Biometrical journal
SN - 0323-3847
IS - 1
ER -