Magmatic Response to Subduction Initiation, Part II: Boninites and Related Rocks of the Izu-Bonin Arc From IOPD Expedition 352

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • John W. Shervais
  • Mark K. Reagan
  • Marguerite Godard
  • Julie Prytulak
  • Jeffrey G. Ryan
  • Julian A. Pearce
  • Renat R. Almeev
  • Hongyan Li
  • Emily Haugen
  • Timothy Chapman
  • Walter Kurz
  • Wendy R. Nelson
  • Daniel E. Heaton
  • Maria Kirchenbaur
  • Kenji Shimizu
  • Tetsuya Sakuyama
  • Scott K. Vetter
  • Yibing Li
  • Scott Whattam

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Utah State University
  • University of Iowa
  • Géosciences Montpellier
  • University of Durham
  • University of South Florida
  • Cardiff University
  • California State University Sacramento
  • University of Sydney
  • University of New England NSW
  • University of Graz
  • Towson University
  • Oregon State University
  • Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)
  • Osaka University
  • Centenary College of Louisiana
  • King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
  • University of Cologne
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2020GC009093
JournalGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Volume22
Issue number1
Early online date16 Nov 2020
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jan 2021

Abstract

International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 352 to the Izu-Bonin forearc cored over 800 m of basement comprising boninite and boninite-series lavas. This is the most extensive, well-constrained suite of boninite series lavas ever obtained from in situ oceanic crust. The boninites are characterized as high-silica boninite (HSB), low-silica boninite (LSB), or basaltic boninite based on their SiO2-MgO-TiO2 relations. The principal fractionation products of all three series are high-Mg andesites (HMA). Lavas recovered >250 meters below seafloor (mbsf) erupted at a forearc spreading axis and are dominated by LSB and HMA. Lavas recovered from <250 mbsf erupted off-axis and are dominated by HSB. The axial and off-axis lavas are characterized by distinct chemostratigraphic trends in their major, trace, and isotopic compositions. The off-axis lavas are chemically similar to boninite from the type locality at Chichijima, with concave-upward rare earth elements patterns. In contrast, the more abundant axial lavas have distinctly light rare earth element-depleted patterns and represent a new, previously unsampled precursor to the Chichijima-type boninite lavas. Petrogenetic modeling suggests that the axial lavas formed by fluxing of refractory mantle (likely the residue from forearc basalt extraction), with amphibolite-facies melt derived from subducting altered oceanic crust. The upper, off-axis lavas require an additional component of sediment-derived melt in addition. Both models are consistent with previously published isotopic data.

Keywords

    boninite, IODP Expedition 352, Izu-Bonin-Mariana forearc, JOIDES Resolution, ophiolites, Sites U1439, U1442, subduction initiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Magmatic Response to Subduction Initiation, Part II: Boninites and Related Rocks of the Izu-Bonin Arc From IOPD Expedition 352. / Shervais, John W.; Reagan, Mark K.; Godard, Marguerite et al.
In: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, Vol. 22, No. 1, e2020GC009093, 12.01.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Shervais, JW, Reagan, MK, Godard, M, Prytulak, J, Ryan, JG, Pearce, JA, Almeev, RR, Li, H, Haugen, E, Chapman, T, Kurz, W, Nelson, WR, Heaton, DE, Kirchenbaur, M, Shimizu, K, Sakuyama, T, Vetter, SK, Li, Y & Whattam, S 2021, 'Magmatic Response to Subduction Initiation, Part II: Boninites and Related Rocks of the Izu-Bonin Arc From IOPD Expedition 352', Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, vol. 22, no. 1, e2020GC009093. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009093
Shervais, J. W., Reagan, M. K., Godard, M., Prytulak, J., Ryan, J. G., Pearce, J. A., Almeev, R. R., Li, H., Haugen, E., Chapman, T., Kurz, W., Nelson, W. R., Heaton, D. E., Kirchenbaur, M., Shimizu, K., Sakuyama, T., Vetter, S. K., Li, Y., & Whattam, S. (2021). Magmatic Response to Subduction Initiation, Part II: Boninites and Related Rocks of the Izu-Bonin Arc From IOPD Expedition 352. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 22(1), Article e2020GC009093. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009093
Shervais JW, Reagan MK, Godard M, Prytulak J, Ryan JG, Pearce JA et al. Magmatic Response to Subduction Initiation, Part II: Boninites and Related Rocks of the Izu-Bonin Arc From IOPD Expedition 352. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 2021 Jan 12;22(1):e2020GC009093. Epub 2020 Nov 16. doi: 10.1029/2020GC009093
Download
@article{f35acc14fc0042beb17512c7d7d40fda,
title = "Magmatic Response to Subduction Initiation, Part II: Boninites and Related Rocks of the Izu-Bonin Arc From IOPD Expedition 352",
abstract = "International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 352 to the Izu-Bonin forearc cored over 800 m of basement comprising boninite and boninite-series lavas. This is the most extensive, well-constrained suite of boninite series lavas ever obtained from in situ oceanic crust. The boninites are characterized as high-silica boninite (HSB), low-silica boninite (LSB), or basaltic boninite based on their SiO2-MgO-TiO2 relations. The principal fractionation products of all three series are high-Mg andesites (HMA). Lavas recovered >250 meters below seafloor (mbsf) erupted at a forearc spreading axis and are dominated by LSB and HMA. Lavas recovered from <250 mbsf erupted off-axis and are dominated by HSB. The axial and off-axis lavas are characterized by distinct chemostratigraphic trends in their major, trace, and isotopic compositions. The off-axis lavas are chemically similar to boninite from the type locality at Chichijima, with concave-upward rare earth elements patterns. In contrast, the more abundant axial lavas have distinctly light rare earth element-depleted patterns and represent a new, previously unsampled precursor to the Chichijima-type boninite lavas. Petrogenetic modeling suggests that the axial lavas formed by fluxing of refractory mantle (likely the residue from forearc basalt extraction), with amphibolite-facies melt derived from subducting altered oceanic crust. The upper, off-axis lavas require an additional component of sediment-derived melt in addition. Both models are consistent with previously published isotopic data.",
keywords = "boninite, IODP Expedition 352, Izu-Bonin-Mariana forearc, JOIDES Resolution, ophiolites, Sites U1439, U1442, subduction initiation",
author = "Shervais, {John W.} and Reagan, {Mark K.} and Marguerite Godard and Julie Prytulak and Ryan, {Jeffrey G.} and Pearce, {Julian A.} and Almeev, {Renat R.} and Hongyan Li and Emily Haugen and Timothy Chapman and Walter Kurz and Nelson, {Wendy R.} and Heaton, {Daniel E.} and Maria Kirchenbaur and Kenji Shimizu and Tetsuya Sakuyama and Vetter, {Scott K.} and Yibing Li and Scott Whattam",
note = "Funding Information: This research used samples and/or data provided by the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP). The authors are grateful for support from IODP, the JOIDES Resolution Facility, and the scientific staff and crew aboard the JOIDES Resolution during Expedition 352. Funding support to the US participants (John W. Shervais, Mark Reagan, Jeffrey G. Ryan, Wendy R. Nelson) from the Consortium for Ocean Leadership and from the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged (OCE‐1558689 to Shervais; OCE‐1558647 to Reagan, OCE‐1558855 to Ryan, and OCE‐1558608 to Nelson). Prytulak was supported by NERC directed grant NE/M010643/1. Chapman was supported by the Australia‐New Zealand IODP consortium and the ARC LIEF scheme (LE140100047). Almeev was supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG, Project AL1189/8‐1). Pearce was supported by NERC (UK) grant (NE/M012034/1). Kurz appreciates support by the Austrian Academy of Sciences and funding by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF Project P27982‐N29). Kirchenbaur appreciates funding by the German IODP consortium and the BGR Germany. All data submitted to the Pangaea database for archiving. We thank Ivan Savov, Marcel Regelous, and two anonymous reviewers for their thorough and thoughtful reviews, which markedly improved the manuscript. ",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
day = "12",
doi = "10.1029/2020GC009093",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems",
issn = "1525-2027",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magmatic Response to Subduction Initiation, Part II

T2 - Boninites and Related Rocks of the Izu-Bonin Arc From IOPD Expedition 352

AU - Shervais, John W.

AU - Reagan, Mark K.

AU - Godard, Marguerite

AU - Prytulak, Julie

AU - Ryan, Jeffrey G.

AU - Pearce, Julian A.

AU - Almeev, Renat R.

AU - Li, Hongyan

AU - Haugen, Emily

AU - Chapman, Timothy

AU - Kurz, Walter

AU - Nelson, Wendy R.

AU - Heaton, Daniel E.

AU - Kirchenbaur, Maria

AU - Shimizu, Kenji

AU - Sakuyama, Tetsuya

AU - Vetter, Scott K.

AU - Li, Yibing

AU - Whattam, Scott

N1 - Funding Information: This research used samples and/or data provided by the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP). The authors are grateful for support from IODP, the JOIDES Resolution Facility, and the scientific staff and crew aboard the JOIDES Resolution during Expedition 352. Funding support to the US participants (John W. Shervais, Mark Reagan, Jeffrey G. Ryan, Wendy R. Nelson) from the Consortium for Ocean Leadership and from the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged (OCE‐1558689 to Shervais; OCE‐1558647 to Reagan, OCE‐1558855 to Ryan, and OCE‐1558608 to Nelson). Prytulak was supported by NERC directed grant NE/M010643/1. Chapman was supported by the Australia‐New Zealand IODP consortium and the ARC LIEF scheme (LE140100047). Almeev was supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG, Project AL1189/8‐1). Pearce was supported by NERC (UK) grant (NE/M012034/1). Kurz appreciates support by the Austrian Academy of Sciences and funding by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF Project P27982‐N29). Kirchenbaur appreciates funding by the German IODP consortium and the BGR Germany. All data submitted to the Pangaea database for archiving. We thank Ivan Savov, Marcel Regelous, and two anonymous reviewers for their thorough and thoughtful reviews, which markedly improved the manuscript.

PY - 2021/1/12

Y1 - 2021/1/12

N2 - International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 352 to the Izu-Bonin forearc cored over 800 m of basement comprising boninite and boninite-series lavas. This is the most extensive, well-constrained suite of boninite series lavas ever obtained from in situ oceanic crust. The boninites are characterized as high-silica boninite (HSB), low-silica boninite (LSB), or basaltic boninite based on their SiO2-MgO-TiO2 relations. The principal fractionation products of all three series are high-Mg andesites (HMA). Lavas recovered >250 meters below seafloor (mbsf) erupted at a forearc spreading axis and are dominated by LSB and HMA. Lavas recovered from <250 mbsf erupted off-axis and are dominated by HSB. The axial and off-axis lavas are characterized by distinct chemostratigraphic trends in their major, trace, and isotopic compositions. The off-axis lavas are chemically similar to boninite from the type locality at Chichijima, with concave-upward rare earth elements patterns. In contrast, the more abundant axial lavas have distinctly light rare earth element-depleted patterns and represent a new, previously unsampled precursor to the Chichijima-type boninite lavas. Petrogenetic modeling suggests that the axial lavas formed by fluxing of refractory mantle (likely the residue from forearc basalt extraction), with amphibolite-facies melt derived from subducting altered oceanic crust. The upper, off-axis lavas require an additional component of sediment-derived melt in addition. Both models are consistent with previously published isotopic data.

AB - International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 352 to the Izu-Bonin forearc cored over 800 m of basement comprising boninite and boninite-series lavas. This is the most extensive, well-constrained suite of boninite series lavas ever obtained from in situ oceanic crust. The boninites are characterized as high-silica boninite (HSB), low-silica boninite (LSB), or basaltic boninite based on their SiO2-MgO-TiO2 relations. The principal fractionation products of all three series are high-Mg andesites (HMA). Lavas recovered >250 meters below seafloor (mbsf) erupted at a forearc spreading axis and are dominated by LSB and HMA. Lavas recovered from <250 mbsf erupted off-axis and are dominated by HSB. The axial and off-axis lavas are characterized by distinct chemostratigraphic trends in their major, trace, and isotopic compositions. The off-axis lavas are chemically similar to boninite from the type locality at Chichijima, with concave-upward rare earth elements patterns. In contrast, the more abundant axial lavas have distinctly light rare earth element-depleted patterns and represent a new, previously unsampled precursor to the Chichijima-type boninite lavas. Petrogenetic modeling suggests that the axial lavas formed by fluxing of refractory mantle (likely the residue from forearc basalt extraction), with amphibolite-facies melt derived from subducting altered oceanic crust. The upper, off-axis lavas require an additional component of sediment-derived melt in addition. Both models are consistent with previously published isotopic data.

KW - boninite

KW - IODP Expedition 352

KW - Izu-Bonin-Mariana forearc

KW - JOIDES Resolution

KW - ophiolites

KW - Sites U1439, U1442

KW - subduction initiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099788283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2020GC009093

DO - 10.1029/2020GC009093

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85099788283

VL - 22

JO - Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems

JF - Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems

SN - 1525-2027

IS - 1

M1 - e2020GC009093

ER -

By the same author(s)