Load transfer of graphene/carbon nanotube/polyethylene hybrid nanocomposite by molecular dynamics simulation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Yancheng Zhang
  • Xiaoying Zhuang
  • Jacob Muthu
  • Tarek Mabrouki
  • Michaël Fontaine
  • Yadong Gong
  • Timon Rabczuk

External Research Organisations

  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
  • Tongji University
  • University of the Witwatersrand
  • University of Tunis El-Manar
  • Universite de Franche-Comte
  • Northeastern University China
  • Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
  • Korea University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-33
Number of pages7
JournalComposites Part B: Engineering
Volume63
Publication statusPublished - 27 Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Load transfer of the graphene/carbon nanotube (CNT)/polyethylene hybrid nanocomposite is studied here from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Simulations of this composite material under uniaxial tension were conducted by varying CNT's position and diameter in the polymer matrix. The obtained results show that: (1) The peak strength of stress and strain evolution in the polymer matrix is lower than the peak strength of the graphene/graphene and graphene/polymer interfaces. Hence, the damage zone is always located in the polymer matrix. (2) Agglomerated two-layer graphenes do not possess an increased value in the peak strength compared with single-layer graphene-reinforced polymer nanocomposite (PNC), while two separate layers of graphene show slightly higher peak strength. (3) The largest peak strength is observed before CNT moves to the center of the polymer matrix. The damage location moves from the upper to the lower part of CNT when the CNT is located at the centre of polymer matrix. (4) The influence of the CNT diameter on the peak strength is not obvious, while the damage location and shape in the polymer matrix changes with respect to varying CNT diameters. In addition, the damage zone always falls outside the interphase zone.

Keywords

    A. Hybrid, A. Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs), B. Debonding, B. Interface/interphase, Molecular dynamics simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Load transfer of graphene/carbon nanotube/polyethylene hybrid nanocomposite by molecular dynamics simulation. / Zhang, Yancheng; Zhuang, Xiaoying; Muthu, Jacob et al.
In: Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 63, 27.03.2014, p. 27-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Zhang Y, Zhuang X, Muthu J, Mabrouki T, Fontaine M, Gong Y et al. Load transfer of graphene/carbon nanotube/polyethylene hybrid nanocomposite by molecular dynamics simulation. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2014 Mar 27;63:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.009
Zhang, Yancheng ; Zhuang, Xiaoying ; Muthu, Jacob et al. / Load transfer of graphene/carbon nanotube/polyethylene hybrid nanocomposite by molecular dynamics simulation. In: Composites Part B: Engineering. 2014 ; Vol. 63. pp. 27-33.
Download
@article{b9810bc08f0f410c8b82435ce5cfef26,
title = "Load transfer of graphene/carbon nanotube/polyethylene hybrid nanocomposite by molecular dynamics simulation",
abstract = "Load transfer of the graphene/carbon nanotube (CNT)/polyethylene hybrid nanocomposite is studied here from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Simulations of this composite material under uniaxial tension were conducted by varying CNT's position and diameter in the polymer matrix. The obtained results show that: (1) The peak strength of stress and strain evolution in the polymer matrix is lower than the peak strength of the graphene/graphene and graphene/polymer interfaces. Hence, the damage zone is always located in the polymer matrix. (2) Agglomerated two-layer graphenes do not possess an increased value in the peak strength compared with single-layer graphene-reinforced polymer nanocomposite (PNC), while two separate layers of graphene show slightly higher peak strength. (3) The largest peak strength is observed before CNT moves to the center of the polymer matrix. The damage location moves from the upper to the lower part of CNT when the CNT is located at the centre of polymer matrix. (4) The influence of the CNT diameter on the peak strength is not obvious, while the damage location and shape in the polymer matrix changes with respect to varying CNT diameters. In addition, the damage zone always falls outside the interphase zone.",
keywords = "A. Hybrid, A. Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs), B. Debonding, B. Interface/interphase, Molecular dynamics simulation",
author = "Yancheng Zhang and Xiaoying Zhuang and Jacob Muthu and Tarek Mabrouki and Micha{\"e}l Fontaine and Yadong Gong and Timon Rabczuk",
note = "Funding information: The authors thank Dr. J.W. Jiang and Dr. J.H. Zhao for the helpful discussions. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial supports from the German Federation of Materials Science and Engineering (BV MatWerk), the German Research Foundation (DFG), the Marie Curie International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES)- MULTIFRAC and National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program: 2011CB013800). Prof. Y. Gong would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 51375082 ), and Prof. T. Rabczuk also thanks the Humboldt-foundation .",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.009",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "27--33",
journal = "Composites Part B: Engineering",
issn = "1359-8368",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Load transfer of graphene/carbon nanotube/polyethylene hybrid nanocomposite by molecular dynamics simulation

AU - Zhang, Yancheng

AU - Zhuang, Xiaoying

AU - Muthu, Jacob

AU - Mabrouki, Tarek

AU - Fontaine, Michaël

AU - Gong, Yadong

AU - Rabczuk, Timon

N1 - Funding information: The authors thank Dr. J.W. Jiang and Dr. J.H. Zhao for the helpful discussions. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial supports from the German Federation of Materials Science and Engineering (BV MatWerk), the German Research Foundation (DFG), the Marie Curie International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES)- MULTIFRAC and National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program: 2011CB013800). Prof. Y. Gong would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 51375082 ), and Prof. T. Rabczuk also thanks the Humboldt-foundation .

PY - 2014/3/27

Y1 - 2014/3/27

N2 - Load transfer of the graphene/carbon nanotube (CNT)/polyethylene hybrid nanocomposite is studied here from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Simulations of this composite material under uniaxial tension were conducted by varying CNT's position and diameter in the polymer matrix. The obtained results show that: (1) The peak strength of stress and strain evolution in the polymer matrix is lower than the peak strength of the graphene/graphene and graphene/polymer interfaces. Hence, the damage zone is always located in the polymer matrix. (2) Agglomerated two-layer graphenes do not possess an increased value in the peak strength compared with single-layer graphene-reinforced polymer nanocomposite (PNC), while two separate layers of graphene show slightly higher peak strength. (3) The largest peak strength is observed before CNT moves to the center of the polymer matrix. The damage location moves from the upper to the lower part of CNT when the CNT is located at the centre of polymer matrix. (4) The influence of the CNT diameter on the peak strength is not obvious, while the damage location and shape in the polymer matrix changes with respect to varying CNT diameters. In addition, the damage zone always falls outside the interphase zone.

AB - Load transfer of the graphene/carbon nanotube (CNT)/polyethylene hybrid nanocomposite is studied here from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Simulations of this composite material under uniaxial tension were conducted by varying CNT's position and diameter in the polymer matrix. The obtained results show that: (1) The peak strength of stress and strain evolution in the polymer matrix is lower than the peak strength of the graphene/graphene and graphene/polymer interfaces. Hence, the damage zone is always located in the polymer matrix. (2) Agglomerated two-layer graphenes do not possess an increased value in the peak strength compared with single-layer graphene-reinforced polymer nanocomposite (PNC), while two separate layers of graphene show slightly higher peak strength. (3) The largest peak strength is observed before CNT moves to the center of the polymer matrix. The damage location moves from the upper to the lower part of CNT when the CNT is located at the centre of polymer matrix. (4) The influence of the CNT diameter on the peak strength is not obvious, while the damage location and shape in the polymer matrix changes with respect to varying CNT diameters. In addition, the damage zone always falls outside the interphase zone.

KW - A. Hybrid

KW - A. Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs)

KW - B. Debonding

KW - B. Interface/interphase

KW - Molecular dynamics simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898994301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84898994301

VL - 63

SP - 27

EP - 33

JO - Composites Part B: Engineering

JF - Composites Part B: Engineering

SN - 1359-8368

ER -