Linking BIM and Design of Experiments to balance architectural and technical design factors for energy performance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Arno Schlueter
  • Philipp Florian Geyer

External Research Organisations

  • ETH Zurich
  • KU Leuven
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-43
Number of pages11
JournalAutomation in construction
Volume86
Early online date9 Nov 2017
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

To transform the existing energy systems towards renewable energy sources, buildings need to use less energy, use energy more efficiently and harness local renewable energy sources. For the design of energy-efficient buildings, building energy simulation of varying sophistication is commonly employed. Types of simulations range from simple, static calculations to sophisticated dynamic simulation. Especially for building retrofit many assumptions on construction, material etc. have to be taken, which increases the uncertainty of simulation results. In conjunction with simulation, methods of Building Performance Optimization are increasingly employed. They are able to identify best performing designs however do not provide insights on the mechanisms and interdependencies of the different design factors, which are most valuable to make informed design decisions. We present a methodology that aims to provide a better understanding and create knowledge about the influence and interactions of different architectural and technical design factors on building energy performance of a specific design task. For this purpose, we introduce Design of Experiments (DoE) in an integrated design workflow using the Design Performance Viewer (DPV) toolset, combining Building Information Modeling (BIM), distributed dynamic simulation and statistical analysis of the extensive simulation results. The experiments created using the methodology allow to identify the strength of effects and interactions of different design factors on selected performance indicators. We apply the methodology on an office retrofit case, introducing a factor scatterplot for result visualization, development and comparison of retrofit strategies. We further evaluate its potential to identify high performing strategies while balancing architectural and technical factors and their impact on energy performance.

Keywords

    Building information modeling (BIM), Building retrofit, Design of Experiments (DoE), Distributed simulation, Dynamic simulation, Retrofit design strategies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Linking BIM and Design of Experiments to balance architectural and technical design factors for energy performance. / Schlueter, Arno; Geyer, Philipp Florian.
In: Automation in construction, Vol. 86, 02.2018, p. 33-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Schlueter A, Geyer PF. Linking BIM and Design of Experiments to balance architectural and technical design factors for energy performance. Automation in construction. 2018 Feb;86:33-43. Epub 2017 Nov 9. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.021
Download
@article{76230d3c43e4420ba0c42dd348aa2d87,
title = "Linking BIM and Design of Experiments to balance architectural and technical design factors for energy performance",
abstract = "To transform the existing energy systems towards renewable energy sources, buildings need to use less energy, use energy more efficiently and harness local renewable energy sources. For the design of energy-efficient buildings, building energy simulation of varying sophistication is commonly employed. Types of simulations range from simple, static calculations to sophisticated dynamic simulation. Especially for building retrofit many assumptions on construction, material etc. have to be taken, which increases the uncertainty of simulation results. In conjunction with simulation, methods of Building Performance Optimization are increasingly employed. They are able to identify best performing designs however do not provide insights on the mechanisms and interdependencies of the different design factors, which are most valuable to make informed design decisions. We present a methodology that aims to provide a better understanding and create knowledge about the influence and interactions of different architectural and technical design factors on building energy performance of a specific design task. For this purpose, we introduce Design of Experiments (DoE) in an integrated design workflow using the Design Performance Viewer (DPV) toolset, combining Building Information Modeling (BIM), distributed dynamic simulation and statistical analysis of the extensive simulation results. The experiments created using the methodology allow to identify the strength of effects and interactions of different design factors on selected performance indicators. We apply the methodology on an office retrofit case, introducing a factor scatterplot for result visualization, development and comparison of retrofit strategies. We further evaluate its potential to identify high performing strategies while balancing architectural and technical factors and their impact on energy performance.",
keywords = "Building information modeling (BIM), Building retrofit, Design of Experiments (DoE), Distributed simulation, Dynamic simulation, Retrofit design strategies",
author = "Arno Schlueter and Geyer, {Philipp Florian}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2018",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.021",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "33--43",
journal = "Automation in construction",
issn = "0926-5805",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking BIM and Design of Experiments to balance architectural and technical design factors for energy performance

AU - Schlueter, Arno

AU - Geyer, Philipp Florian

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - To transform the existing energy systems towards renewable energy sources, buildings need to use less energy, use energy more efficiently and harness local renewable energy sources. For the design of energy-efficient buildings, building energy simulation of varying sophistication is commonly employed. Types of simulations range from simple, static calculations to sophisticated dynamic simulation. Especially for building retrofit many assumptions on construction, material etc. have to be taken, which increases the uncertainty of simulation results. In conjunction with simulation, methods of Building Performance Optimization are increasingly employed. They are able to identify best performing designs however do not provide insights on the mechanisms and interdependencies of the different design factors, which are most valuable to make informed design decisions. We present a methodology that aims to provide a better understanding and create knowledge about the influence and interactions of different architectural and technical design factors on building energy performance of a specific design task. For this purpose, we introduce Design of Experiments (DoE) in an integrated design workflow using the Design Performance Viewer (DPV) toolset, combining Building Information Modeling (BIM), distributed dynamic simulation and statistical analysis of the extensive simulation results. The experiments created using the methodology allow to identify the strength of effects and interactions of different design factors on selected performance indicators. We apply the methodology on an office retrofit case, introducing a factor scatterplot for result visualization, development and comparison of retrofit strategies. We further evaluate its potential to identify high performing strategies while balancing architectural and technical factors and their impact on energy performance.

AB - To transform the existing energy systems towards renewable energy sources, buildings need to use less energy, use energy more efficiently and harness local renewable energy sources. For the design of energy-efficient buildings, building energy simulation of varying sophistication is commonly employed. Types of simulations range from simple, static calculations to sophisticated dynamic simulation. Especially for building retrofit many assumptions on construction, material etc. have to be taken, which increases the uncertainty of simulation results. In conjunction with simulation, methods of Building Performance Optimization are increasingly employed. They are able to identify best performing designs however do not provide insights on the mechanisms and interdependencies of the different design factors, which are most valuable to make informed design decisions. We present a methodology that aims to provide a better understanding and create knowledge about the influence and interactions of different architectural and technical design factors on building energy performance of a specific design task. For this purpose, we introduce Design of Experiments (DoE) in an integrated design workflow using the Design Performance Viewer (DPV) toolset, combining Building Information Modeling (BIM), distributed dynamic simulation and statistical analysis of the extensive simulation results. The experiments created using the methodology allow to identify the strength of effects and interactions of different design factors on selected performance indicators. We apply the methodology on an office retrofit case, introducing a factor scatterplot for result visualization, development and comparison of retrofit strategies. We further evaluate its potential to identify high performing strategies while balancing architectural and technical factors and their impact on energy performance.

KW - Building information modeling (BIM)

KW - Building retrofit

KW - Design of Experiments (DoE)

KW - Distributed simulation

KW - Dynamic simulation

KW - Retrofit design strategies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033372467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.021

DO - 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.021

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85033372467

VL - 86

SP - 33

EP - 43

JO - Automation in construction

JF - Automation in construction

SN - 0926-5805

ER -