Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 122266 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Management |
| Volume | 369 |
| Early online date | 30 Aug 2024 |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2024 |
Abstract
Risk assessment and management of Legionella spp. contamination in activated sludge in wastewater treatment plants is carried out using the culture method. Underestimation of Legionella spp. is frequently reported in the literature, but a comprehensive long-term study of the performance of the method under comparable conditions is still lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the recovery rate and limit of detection of the culture method for Legionella spp. from activated sludge samples collected during the different seasons of the year. Activated sludge samples spiked with Legionella pneumophila subsp. pneumophila strain Philadelphia-1 (mean concentration 5.2 ± 0.35 logCFU/mL) were analysed monthly for one year using the culture method. Three different sample pre-treatments were compared, namely filtration, acid treatment and thermal treatment, and the recovery rate and limit of detection were assessed for each. The recovery rate of the culture method for Legionella spp. depended on the type of sample pre-treatment and the season of activated sludge sampling, while the limit of detection depended only on the sample pre-treatment. The best performance of the culture method, defined as the combination of the highest recovery rate and lowest limit of detection, was obtained for the filtered acid pre-treated samples (recovery rate: 89 ± 4 %; limit of detection: 1.3 logCFU/mL in 83 % of the samples). The lowest limit of detection was observed for the filtered thermally pre-treated samples (1.0 logCFU/mL in 93 % of the samples). Simultaneously, both thermally pre-treated samples showed up to a third lower recovery rates than the other pre-treatments in winter, while untreated and acid pre-treated samples showed consistently high recovery rates (>80%, logCFU/mL). The recovery rates of the unfiltered and filtered thermally pre-treated samples showed significant weak to strong positive correlations with the organic and phosphorus load in the influent as well as with the water and atmospheric temperatures, indicating that the recovery rate depends on the seasonal variation of the wastewater composition. This study presents new insights into the detection and quantification of Legionella spp. in activated sludge samples and considers seasonal dependencies in analytical results.
Keywords
- Acid and thermal pre-treatment, Activated sludge, Culture method, Legionella pneumophila, Legionella spp, Wastewater treatment plant
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)
- Environmental Engineering
- Environmental Science(all)
- Waste Management and Disposal
- Environmental Science(all)
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 369, 122266, 10.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Lessons learned from a one-year study of Legionella spp. cultivation from activated sludge samples
AU - Dörrie, Beatriz
AU - Nogueira, Regina
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Risk assessment and management of Legionella spp. contamination in activated sludge in wastewater treatment plants is carried out using the culture method. Underestimation of Legionella spp. is frequently reported in the literature, but a comprehensive long-term study of the performance of the method under comparable conditions is still lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the recovery rate and limit of detection of the culture method for Legionella spp. from activated sludge samples collected during the different seasons of the year. Activated sludge samples spiked with Legionella pneumophila subsp. pneumophila strain Philadelphia-1 (mean concentration 5.2 ± 0.35 logCFU/mL) were analysed monthly for one year using the culture method. Three different sample pre-treatments were compared, namely filtration, acid treatment and thermal treatment, and the recovery rate and limit of detection were assessed for each. The recovery rate of the culture method for Legionella spp. depended on the type of sample pre-treatment and the season of activated sludge sampling, while the limit of detection depended only on the sample pre-treatment. The best performance of the culture method, defined as the combination of the highest recovery rate and lowest limit of detection, was obtained for the filtered acid pre-treated samples (recovery rate: 89 ± 4 %; limit of detection: 1.3 logCFU/mL in 83 % of the samples). The lowest limit of detection was observed for the filtered thermally pre-treated samples (1.0 logCFU/mL in 93 % of the samples). Simultaneously, both thermally pre-treated samples showed up to a third lower recovery rates than the other pre-treatments in winter, while untreated and acid pre-treated samples showed consistently high recovery rates (>80%, logCFU/mL). The recovery rates of the unfiltered and filtered thermally pre-treated samples showed significant weak to strong positive correlations with the organic and phosphorus load in the influent as well as with the water and atmospheric temperatures, indicating that the recovery rate depends on the seasonal variation of the wastewater composition. This study presents new insights into the detection and quantification of Legionella spp. in activated sludge samples and considers seasonal dependencies in analytical results.
AB - Risk assessment and management of Legionella spp. contamination in activated sludge in wastewater treatment plants is carried out using the culture method. Underestimation of Legionella spp. is frequently reported in the literature, but a comprehensive long-term study of the performance of the method under comparable conditions is still lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the recovery rate and limit of detection of the culture method for Legionella spp. from activated sludge samples collected during the different seasons of the year. Activated sludge samples spiked with Legionella pneumophila subsp. pneumophila strain Philadelphia-1 (mean concentration 5.2 ± 0.35 logCFU/mL) were analysed monthly for one year using the culture method. Three different sample pre-treatments were compared, namely filtration, acid treatment and thermal treatment, and the recovery rate and limit of detection were assessed for each. The recovery rate of the culture method for Legionella spp. depended on the type of sample pre-treatment and the season of activated sludge sampling, while the limit of detection depended only on the sample pre-treatment. The best performance of the culture method, defined as the combination of the highest recovery rate and lowest limit of detection, was obtained for the filtered acid pre-treated samples (recovery rate: 89 ± 4 %; limit of detection: 1.3 logCFU/mL in 83 % of the samples). The lowest limit of detection was observed for the filtered thermally pre-treated samples (1.0 logCFU/mL in 93 % of the samples). Simultaneously, both thermally pre-treated samples showed up to a third lower recovery rates than the other pre-treatments in winter, while untreated and acid pre-treated samples showed consistently high recovery rates (>80%, logCFU/mL). The recovery rates of the unfiltered and filtered thermally pre-treated samples showed significant weak to strong positive correlations with the organic and phosphorus load in the influent as well as with the water and atmospheric temperatures, indicating that the recovery rate depends on the seasonal variation of the wastewater composition. This study presents new insights into the detection and quantification of Legionella spp. in activated sludge samples and considers seasonal dependencies in analytical results.
KW - Acid and thermal pre-treatment
KW - Activated sludge
KW - Culture method
KW - Legionella pneumophila
KW - Legionella spp
KW - Wastewater treatment plant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202347069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122266
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122266
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85202347069
VL - 369
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
SN - 0301-4797
M1 - 122266
ER -