Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE2009 |
Pages | 387-388 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Event | 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE2009 - Atlanta, GA, United States Duration: 31 Aug 2009 → 4 Sept 2009 |
Publication series
Name | Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering |
---|---|
ISSN (Print) | 1090-705X |
Abstract
Writing good requirements is difficult. Authors of requirements specifications need to acquire specific habits and professional writing styles to avoid ambiguities. However, gaining and sharing related experience and abilities is challenging. Heuristic Critiques offer help in this situation. Experience on writing good requirements can be codified as heuristic critiques. When integrated in a requirements tool, a heuristic critique can automatically check requirements specifications and provide constructive feedback (critique), whenever a piece of experience is applicable. Observing this feedback helps requirements authors to transfer experience in writing, and internalize it. In this paper we describe the concept of learning to write better requirements through heuristic critiques - both, on an individual level and on an organizational level. The proposed concept has been applied in several dedicated requirements support tools; it can also be used to improve existing tools and methods.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Computer Science(all)
- Engineering(all)
- Business, Management and Accounting(all)
- Strategy and Management
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE2009. 2009. p. 387-388 5328481 (Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering).
Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Learning to write better requirements through heuristic critiques
AU - Knauss, Eric
AU - Schneider, Kurt
AU - Stapel, Kai
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Writing good requirements is difficult. Authors of requirements specifications need to acquire specific habits and professional writing styles to avoid ambiguities. However, gaining and sharing related experience and abilities is challenging. Heuristic Critiques offer help in this situation. Experience on writing good requirements can be codified as heuristic critiques. When integrated in a requirements tool, a heuristic critique can automatically check requirements specifications and provide constructive feedback (critique), whenever a piece of experience is applicable. Observing this feedback helps requirements authors to transfer experience in writing, and internalize it. In this paper we describe the concept of learning to write better requirements through heuristic critiques - both, on an individual level and on an organizational level. The proposed concept has been applied in several dedicated requirements support tools; it can also be used to improve existing tools and methods.
AB - Writing good requirements is difficult. Authors of requirements specifications need to acquire specific habits and professional writing styles to avoid ambiguities. However, gaining and sharing related experience and abilities is challenging. Heuristic Critiques offer help in this situation. Experience on writing good requirements can be codified as heuristic critiques. When integrated in a requirements tool, a heuristic critique can automatically check requirements specifications and provide constructive feedback (critique), whenever a piece of experience is applicable. Observing this feedback helps requirements authors to transfer experience in writing, and internalize it. In this paper we describe the concept of learning to write better requirements through heuristic critiques - both, on an individual level and on an organizational level. The proposed concept has been applied in several dedicated requirements support tools; it can also be used to improve existing tools and methods.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73549096435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/RE.2009.58
DO - 10.1109/RE.2009.58
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:73549096435
SN - 9780769537610
T3 - Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering
SP - 387
EP - 388
BT - 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE2009
T2 - 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE2009
Y2 - 31 August 2009 through 4 September 2009
ER -