Learning from major accidents to improve system design

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Raphael Moura
  • Michael Beer
  • Edoardo Patelli
  • John Lewis
  • Franz Knoll

External Research Organisations

  • University of Liverpool
  • NCK Inc.
  • McGill University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-45
Number of pages9
JournalSafety Science
Volume84
Early online date14 Dec 2015
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Despite the massive developments in new technologies, materials and industrial systems, notably supported by advanced structural and risk control assessments, recent major accidents are challenging the practicality and effectiveness of risk control measures designed to improve reliability and reduce the likelihood of losses. Contemporary investigations of accidents occurred in high-technology systems highlighted the connection between human-related issues and major events, which led to catastrophic consequences. Consequently, the understanding of human behavioural characteristics interlaced with current technology aspects and organisational context seems to be of paramount importance for the safety & reliability field. First, significant drawbacks related to the human performance data collection will be minimised by the development of a novel industrial accidents dataset, the Multi-attribute Technological Accidents Dataset (MATA-D), which groups 238 major accidents from different industrial backgrounds and classifies them under a common framework (the Contextual Control Model used as basis for the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method). The accidents collection and the detailed interpretation will provide a rich data source, enabling the usage of integrated information to generate input to design improvement schemes. Then, implications to improve robustness of system design and tackle the surrounding factors and tendencies that could lead to the manifestation of human errors will be effectively addressed.

Keywords

    Accident analysis, CREAM, Human factors, Human reliability analysis, MATA-D, Risk & safety in design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Learning from major accidents to improve system design. / Moura, Raphael; Beer, Michael; Patelli, Edoardo et al.
In: Safety Science, Vol. 84, 04.2016, p. 37-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Moura R, Beer M, Patelli E, Lewis J, Knoll F. Learning from major accidents to improve system design. Safety Science. 2016 Apr;84:37-45. Epub 2015 Dec 14. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.022
Moura, Raphael ; Beer, Michael ; Patelli, Edoardo et al. / Learning from major accidents to improve system design. In: Safety Science. 2016 ; Vol. 84. pp. 37-45.
Download
@article{c02295a2a3604f93b628b1f420b6e007,
title = "Learning from major accidents to improve system design",
abstract = "Despite the massive developments in new technologies, materials and industrial systems, notably supported by advanced structural and risk control assessments, recent major accidents are challenging the practicality and effectiveness of risk control measures designed to improve reliability and reduce the likelihood of losses. Contemporary investigations of accidents occurred in high-technology systems highlighted the connection between human-related issues and major events, which led to catastrophic consequences. Consequently, the understanding of human behavioural characteristics interlaced with current technology aspects and organisational context seems to be of paramount importance for the safety & reliability field. First, significant drawbacks related to the human performance data collection will be minimised by the development of a novel industrial accidents dataset, the Multi-attribute Technological Accidents Dataset (MATA-D), which groups 238 major accidents from different industrial backgrounds and classifies them under a common framework (the Contextual Control Model used as basis for the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method). The accidents collection and the detailed interpretation will provide a rich data source, enabling the usage of integrated information to generate input to design improvement schemes. Then, implications to improve robustness of system design and tackle the surrounding factors and tendencies that could lead to the manifestation of human errors will be effectively addressed.",
keywords = "Accident analysis, CREAM, Human factors, Human reliability analysis, MATA-D, Risk & safety in design",
author = "Raphael Moura and Michael Beer and Edoardo Patelli and John Lewis and Franz Knoll",
note = "Funding Information: This study was partially funded by CAPES – Brazil (Proc. n° 5959/13-6).",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.022",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "37--45",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning from major accidents to improve system design

AU - Moura, Raphael

AU - Beer, Michael

AU - Patelli, Edoardo

AU - Lewis, John

AU - Knoll, Franz

N1 - Funding Information: This study was partially funded by CAPES – Brazil (Proc. n° 5959/13-6).

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - Despite the massive developments in new technologies, materials and industrial systems, notably supported by advanced structural and risk control assessments, recent major accidents are challenging the practicality and effectiveness of risk control measures designed to improve reliability and reduce the likelihood of losses. Contemporary investigations of accidents occurred in high-technology systems highlighted the connection between human-related issues and major events, which led to catastrophic consequences. Consequently, the understanding of human behavioural characteristics interlaced with current technology aspects and organisational context seems to be of paramount importance for the safety & reliability field. First, significant drawbacks related to the human performance data collection will be minimised by the development of a novel industrial accidents dataset, the Multi-attribute Technological Accidents Dataset (MATA-D), which groups 238 major accidents from different industrial backgrounds and classifies them under a common framework (the Contextual Control Model used as basis for the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method). The accidents collection and the detailed interpretation will provide a rich data source, enabling the usage of integrated information to generate input to design improvement schemes. Then, implications to improve robustness of system design and tackle the surrounding factors and tendencies that could lead to the manifestation of human errors will be effectively addressed.

AB - Despite the massive developments in new technologies, materials and industrial systems, notably supported by advanced structural and risk control assessments, recent major accidents are challenging the practicality and effectiveness of risk control measures designed to improve reliability and reduce the likelihood of losses. Contemporary investigations of accidents occurred in high-technology systems highlighted the connection between human-related issues and major events, which led to catastrophic consequences. Consequently, the understanding of human behavioural characteristics interlaced with current technology aspects and organisational context seems to be of paramount importance for the safety & reliability field. First, significant drawbacks related to the human performance data collection will be minimised by the development of a novel industrial accidents dataset, the Multi-attribute Technological Accidents Dataset (MATA-D), which groups 238 major accidents from different industrial backgrounds and classifies them under a common framework (the Contextual Control Model used as basis for the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method). The accidents collection and the detailed interpretation will provide a rich data source, enabling the usage of integrated information to generate input to design improvement schemes. Then, implications to improve robustness of system design and tackle the surrounding factors and tendencies that could lead to the manifestation of human errors will be effectively addressed.

KW - Accident analysis

KW - CREAM

KW - Human factors

KW - Human reliability analysis

KW - MATA-D

KW - Risk & safety in design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949637860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.022

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.022

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84949637860

VL - 84

SP - 37

EP - 45

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

ER -