Large-eddy Simulation of Triangular-stabilized Lean Premixed Turbulent Flames: Quality and Error Assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Bhuvaneswaran Manickam
  • Joerg Franke
  • Siva P.R. Muppala
  • Friedrich Dinkelacker

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • University of Siegen
  • Kingston University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)563-596
Number of pages34
JournalFlow, Turbulence and Combustion
Volume88
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jan 2012

Abstract

In this numerical study, an algebraic flame surface wrinkling (AFSW) reaction submodel based on the progress variable approach is implemented in the large-eddy simulation (LES) context and validated against the triangular stabilized bluff body flame configuration measurements i.e. in VOLVO test rig. The quantitative predictability of the AFSW model is analyzed in comparison with another well validated turbulent flame speed closure (TFC) combustion model in order to help assess the behaviour of the present model and to further help improve the understanding of the flow and flame dynamics. Characterization of non-reacting (or cold) and reacting flows are performed using various subgrid scale models for consistent grid size variation with 300,000 (coarse), 1.2 million (intermediate) and 2.4 million (fine) grid cells. For non-reacting flows at inlet velocity of 17 m/s and inlet temperature 288 K, coarse grid leads to over prediction of turbulence quantities due to low dissipation at the early stage of flow development behind the bluff body that convects downstream eventually polluting the resulting solution. The simulated results with the intermediate (and fine) grid for mean flow and turbulence quantities, and the vortex shedding frequency (f s) closely match experimental data. For combusting flows for lean propane/air mixtures at 35 m/s and 600 K, the vortex shedding frequency increase threefold compared with cold scenario. The predicted results of mean, rms velocities and reaction progress variable are generally in good agreement with experimental data. For the coarse grid the combustion predictions show a shorter recirculation region due to higher turbulent burning rate. Finally, both cold and reacting LES data are analyzed for uncertainty in the solution using two quality assessment techniques: two-grid estimator by Celik, and model and grid variation by Klein. For both approaches, the resolved turbulent kinetic energy is used to estimate the grid quality and error assessment. The quality assessment reveals that the cold flows are well resolved even on the intermediate mesh, while for the reacting flows even the fine mesh is locally not sufficient in the flamelet region. The Klein approach estimates that depending on the recirculation region in cold scenario both numerical andmodel errors rise near the bluff-body region, while in combusting flows these errors are significant behind the stabilizing point due to preheating of unburned mixture and reaction heat release. The total error mainly depends on the numerical error and the influence of model error is low for this configuration.

Keywords

    Algebraic reaction closure, Large-eddy simulation, Premixed combustion, Quality and error analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Large-eddy Simulation of Triangular-stabilized Lean Premixed Turbulent Flames: Quality and Error Assessment. / Manickam, Bhuvaneswaran; Franke, Joerg; Muppala, Siva P.R. et al.
In: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 88, No. 4, 19.01.2012, p. 563-596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Manickam B, Franke J, Muppala SPR, Dinkelacker F. Large-eddy Simulation of Triangular-stabilized Lean Premixed Turbulent Flames: Quality and Error Assessment. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 2012 Jan 19;88(4):563-596. doi: 10.1007/s10494-011-9385-5
Manickam, Bhuvaneswaran ; Franke, Joerg ; Muppala, Siva P.R. et al. / Large-eddy Simulation of Triangular-stabilized Lean Premixed Turbulent Flames : Quality and Error Assessment. In: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 2012 ; Vol. 88, No. 4. pp. 563-596.
Download
@article{0d433ca95c9546e2a8ed8409ab60d970,
title = "Large-eddy Simulation of Triangular-stabilized Lean Premixed Turbulent Flames: Quality and Error Assessment",
abstract = "In this numerical study, an algebraic flame surface wrinkling (AFSW) reaction submodel based on the progress variable approach is implemented in the large-eddy simulation (LES) context and validated against the triangular stabilized bluff body flame configuration measurements i.e. in VOLVO test rig. The quantitative predictability of the AFSW model is analyzed in comparison with another well validated turbulent flame speed closure (TFC) combustion model in order to help assess the behaviour of the present model and to further help improve the understanding of the flow and flame dynamics. Characterization of non-reacting (or cold) and reacting flows are performed using various subgrid scale models for consistent grid size variation with 300,000 (coarse), 1.2 million (intermediate) and 2.4 million (fine) grid cells. For non-reacting flows at inlet velocity of 17 m/s and inlet temperature 288 K, coarse grid leads to over prediction of turbulence quantities due to low dissipation at the early stage of flow development behind the bluff body that convects downstream eventually polluting the resulting solution. The simulated results with the intermediate (and fine) grid for mean flow and turbulence quantities, and the vortex shedding frequency (f s) closely match experimental data. For combusting flows for lean propane/air mixtures at 35 m/s and 600 K, the vortex shedding frequency increase threefold compared with cold scenario. The predicted results of mean, rms velocities and reaction progress variable are generally in good agreement with experimental data. For the coarse grid the combustion predictions show a shorter recirculation region due to higher turbulent burning rate. Finally, both cold and reacting LES data are analyzed for uncertainty in the solution using two quality assessment techniques: two-grid estimator by Celik, and model and grid variation by Klein. For both approaches, the resolved turbulent kinetic energy is used to estimate the grid quality and error assessment. The quality assessment reveals that the cold flows are well resolved even on the intermediate mesh, while for the reacting flows even the fine mesh is locally not sufficient in the flamelet region. The Klein approach estimates that depending on the recirculation region in cold scenario both numerical andmodel errors rise near the bluff-body region, while in combusting flows these errors are significant behind the stabilizing point due to preheating of unburned mixture and reaction heat release. The total error mainly depends on the numerical error and the influence of model error is low for this configuration.",
keywords = "Algebraic reaction closure, Large-eddy simulation, Premixed combustion, Quality and error analysis",
author = "Bhuvaneswaran Manickam and Joerg Franke and Muppala, {Siva P.R.} and Friedrich Dinkelacker",
year = "2012",
month = jan,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1007/s10494-011-9385-5",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "563--596",
journal = "Flow, Turbulence and Combustion",
issn = "1386-6184",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Large-eddy Simulation of Triangular-stabilized Lean Premixed Turbulent Flames

T2 - Quality and Error Assessment

AU - Manickam, Bhuvaneswaran

AU - Franke, Joerg

AU - Muppala, Siva P.R.

AU - Dinkelacker, Friedrich

PY - 2012/1/19

Y1 - 2012/1/19

N2 - In this numerical study, an algebraic flame surface wrinkling (AFSW) reaction submodel based on the progress variable approach is implemented in the large-eddy simulation (LES) context and validated against the triangular stabilized bluff body flame configuration measurements i.e. in VOLVO test rig. The quantitative predictability of the AFSW model is analyzed in comparison with another well validated turbulent flame speed closure (TFC) combustion model in order to help assess the behaviour of the present model and to further help improve the understanding of the flow and flame dynamics. Characterization of non-reacting (or cold) and reacting flows are performed using various subgrid scale models for consistent grid size variation with 300,000 (coarse), 1.2 million (intermediate) and 2.4 million (fine) grid cells. For non-reacting flows at inlet velocity of 17 m/s and inlet temperature 288 K, coarse grid leads to over prediction of turbulence quantities due to low dissipation at the early stage of flow development behind the bluff body that convects downstream eventually polluting the resulting solution. The simulated results with the intermediate (and fine) grid for mean flow and turbulence quantities, and the vortex shedding frequency (f s) closely match experimental data. For combusting flows for lean propane/air mixtures at 35 m/s and 600 K, the vortex shedding frequency increase threefold compared with cold scenario. The predicted results of mean, rms velocities and reaction progress variable are generally in good agreement with experimental data. For the coarse grid the combustion predictions show a shorter recirculation region due to higher turbulent burning rate. Finally, both cold and reacting LES data are analyzed for uncertainty in the solution using two quality assessment techniques: two-grid estimator by Celik, and model and grid variation by Klein. For both approaches, the resolved turbulent kinetic energy is used to estimate the grid quality and error assessment. The quality assessment reveals that the cold flows are well resolved even on the intermediate mesh, while for the reacting flows even the fine mesh is locally not sufficient in the flamelet region. The Klein approach estimates that depending on the recirculation region in cold scenario both numerical andmodel errors rise near the bluff-body region, while in combusting flows these errors are significant behind the stabilizing point due to preheating of unburned mixture and reaction heat release. The total error mainly depends on the numerical error and the influence of model error is low for this configuration.

AB - In this numerical study, an algebraic flame surface wrinkling (AFSW) reaction submodel based on the progress variable approach is implemented in the large-eddy simulation (LES) context and validated against the triangular stabilized bluff body flame configuration measurements i.e. in VOLVO test rig. The quantitative predictability of the AFSW model is analyzed in comparison with another well validated turbulent flame speed closure (TFC) combustion model in order to help assess the behaviour of the present model and to further help improve the understanding of the flow and flame dynamics. Characterization of non-reacting (or cold) and reacting flows are performed using various subgrid scale models for consistent grid size variation with 300,000 (coarse), 1.2 million (intermediate) and 2.4 million (fine) grid cells. For non-reacting flows at inlet velocity of 17 m/s and inlet temperature 288 K, coarse grid leads to over prediction of turbulence quantities due to low dissipation at the early stage of flow development behind the bluff body that convects downstream eventually polluting the resulting solution. The simulated results with the intermediate (and fine) grid for mean flow and turbulence quantities, and the vortex shedding frequency (f s) closely match experimental data. For combusting flows for lean propane/air mixtures at 35 m/s and 600 K, the vortex shedding frequency increase threefold compared with cold scenario. The predicted results of mean, rms velocities and reaction progress variable are generally in good agreement with experimental data. For the coarse grid the combustion predictions show a shorter recirculation region due to higher turbulent burning rate. Finally, both cold and reacting LES data are analyzed for uncertainty in the solution using two quality assessment techniques: two-grid estimator by Celik, and model and grid variation by Klein. For both approaches, the resolved turbulent kinetic energy is used to estimate the grid quality and error assessment. The quality assessment reveals that the cold flows are well resolved even on the intermediate mesh, while for the reacting flows even the fine mesh is locally not sufficient in the flamelet region. The Klein approach estimates that depending on the recirculation region in cold scenario both numerical andmodel errors rise near the bluff-body region, while in combusting flows these errors are significant behind the stabilizing point due to preheating of unburned mixture and reaction heat release. The total error mainly depends on the numerical error and the influence of model error is low for this configuration.

KW - Algebraic reaction closure

KW - Large-eddy simulation

KW - Premixed combustion

KW - Quality and error analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861462349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10494-011-9385-5

DO - 10.1007/s10494-011-9385-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84861462349

VL - 88

SP - 563

EP - 596

JO - Flow, Turbulence and Combustion

JF - Flow, Turbulence and Combustion

SN - 1386-6184

IS - 4

ER -