Knowing me, knowing you-capturing different knowledge systems for river landscape planning and governance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Jennifer Henze
  • Barbara Schröter
  • Christian Albert

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number934
JournalWater (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jul 2018

Abstract

Navigating the evolution of river landscapes towards more sustainable pathways requires transdisciplinary research including diverse stakeholders. A thorough understanding of stakeholder interests, including potential conflicts and options for convergence, is critical for the design and implementation of such transdisciplinary research. So far, only a few studies have conducted in-depth stakeholder analyses. The aim of this paper is to elucidate and characterize the interests of the relevant actors in a case study for sustainable river landscape development in Germany. The research questions concern the (i) commonalities and differences as manifested in the structures of thought and action of the actors, and the (ii) potential points of conflict or convergence of interests, as relevant for further transdisciplinary research. Our methods include participating in observations in three meetings of the actors, and conducting twelve individual interviews, as well as a focus group discussion. Our results identify major conflicts between the actors' perspectives regarding navigation interests and the demands for nature conservation. Potential issues for convergence are ecological river restoration and enhancing recreation opportunities. The findings shed light on the diversity of the stakeholder perspectives around river landscape development. We recommend that future projects capture this diversity through a triangulation approach.

Keywords

    Knowledge co-production, Knowledge systems, Stakeholder analysis, Stakeholder interaction, Thought style, Transdisciplinary water research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Knowing me, knowing you-capturing different knowledge systems for river landscape planning and governance. / Henze, Jennifer; Schröter, Barbara; Albert, Christian.
In: Water (Switzerland), Vol. 10, No. 7, 934, 13.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Henze J, Schröter B, Albert C. Knowing me, knowing you-capturing different knowledge systems for river landscape planning and governance. Water (Switzerland). 2018 Jul 13;10(7):934. doi: 10.3390/w10070934, 10.15488/3852
Henze, Jennifer ; Schröter, Barbara ; Albert, Christian. / Knowing me, knowing you-capturing different knowledge systems for river landscape planning and governance. In: Water (Switzerland). 2018 ; Vol. 10, No. 7.
Download
@article{5ce57d30efd74d51b1e1395ee2b6b33d,
title = "Knowing me, knowing you-capturing different knowledge systems for river landscape planning and governance",
abstract = "Navigating the evolution of river landscapes towards more sustainable pathways requires transdisciplinary research including diverse stakeholders. A thorough understanding of stakeholder interests, including potential conflicts and options for convergence, is critical for the design and implementation of such transdisciplinary research. So far, only a few studies have conducted in-depth stakeholder analyses. The aim of this paper is to elucidate and characterize the interests of the relevant actors in a case study for sustainable river landscape development in Germany. The research questions concern the (i) commonalities and differences as manifested in the structures of thought and action of the actors, and the (ii) potential points of conflict or convergence of interests, as relevant for further transdisciplinary research. Our methods include participating in observations in three meetings of the actors, and conducting twelve individual interviews, as well as a focus group discussion. Our results identify major conflicts between the actors' perspectives regarding navigation interests and the demands for nature conservation. Potential issues for convergence are ecological river restoration and enhancing recreation opportunities. The findings shed light on the diversity of the stakeholder perspectives around river landscape development. We recommend that future projects capture this diversity through a triangulation approach.",
keywords = "Knowledge co-production, Knowledge systems, Stakeholder analysis, Stakeholder interaction, Thought style, Transdisciplinary water research",
author = "Jennifer Henze and Barbara Schr{\"o}ter and Christian Albert",
note = "Funding information: The research was funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) through the Junior Research Group PlanSmart (funding code: 01UU1601A).",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "13",
doi = "10.3390/w10070934",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Water (Switzerland)",
issn = "2073-4441",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute",
number = "7",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowing me, knowing you-capturing different knowledge systems for river landscape planning and governance

AU - Henze, Jennifer

AU - Schröter, Barbara

AU - Albert, Christian

N1 - Funding information: The research was funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) through the Junior Research Group PlanSmart (funding code: 01UU1601A).

PY - 2018/7/13

Y1 - 2018/7/13

N2 - Navigating the evolution of river landscapes towards more sustainable pathways requires transdisciplinary research including diverse stakeholders. A thorough understanding of stakeholder interests, including potential conflicts and options for convergence, is critical for the design and implementation of such transdisciplinary research. So far, only a few studies have conducted in-depth stakeholder analyses. The aim of this paper is to elucidate and characterize the interests of the relevant actors in a case study for sustainable river landscape development in Germany. The research questions concern the (i) commonalities and differences as manifested in the structures of thought and action of the actors, and the (ii) potential points of conflict or convergence of interests, as relevant for further transdisciplinary research. Our methods include participating in observations in three meetings of the actors, and conducting twelve individual interviews, as well as a focus group discussion. Our results identify major conflicts between the actors' perspectives regarding navigation interests and the demands for nature conservation. Potential issues for convergence are ecological river restoration and enhancing recreation opportunities. The findings shed light on the diversity of the stakeholder perspectives around river landscape development. We recommend that future projects capture this diversity through a triangulation approach.

AB - Navigating the evolution of river landscapes towards more sustainable pathways requires transdisciplinary research including diverse stakeholders. A thorough understanding of stakeholder interests, including potential conflicts and options for convergence, is critical for the design and implementation of such transdisciplinary research. So far, only a few studies have conducted in-depth stakeholder analyses. The aim of this paper is to elucidate and characterize the interests of the relevant actors in a case study for sustainable river landscape development in Germany. The research questions concern the (i) commonalities and differences as manifested in the structures of thought and action of the actors, and the (ii) potential points of conflict or convergence of interests, as relevant for further transdisciplinary research. Our methods include participating in observations in three meetings of the actors, and conducting twelve individual interviews, as well as a focus group discussion. Our results identify major conflicts between the actors' perspectives regarding navigation interests and the demands for nature conservation. Potential issues for convergence are ecological river restoration and enhancing recreation opportunities. The findings shed light on the diversity of the stakeholder perspectives around river landscape development. We recommend that future projects capture this diversity through a triangulation approach.

KW - Knowledge co-production

KW - Knowledge systems

KW - Stakeholder analysis

KW - Stakeholder interaction

KW - Thought style

KW - Transdisciplinary water research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050188691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/w10070934

DO - 10.3390/w10070934

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050188691

VL - 10

JO - Water (Switzerland)

JF - Water (Switzerland)

SN - 2073-4441

IS - 7

M1 - 934

ER -