Izvrševanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionPerformance and elaboration of reasons, objective and subjective data – A parallel?
Original languageSlovenian
Pages (from-to)231-258
Number of pages28
JournalPhainomena
Volume27
Issue number104-105
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2018

Abstract

Objective data are distinguished from subjective data based on formulating the expressivity of human performance and its traces, whereby subjective data result from prospective and retrospective elaboration of reasons. Objective data are further differentiated into performances of the case (type 2) and performances of the life practice encompassing it (type 1). The interpretation of objective data of type 1 and 2 has a biographical focus on the case structure in its formative process, whereas the interpretation of type 2 objective data has a motivational focus and extrapolates from the positioning of a case to its disposition. The differentiation of objective data generally fulfills the function of correcting the self-interpretation of the case and establishes the possibility of defining the reflective relation of the case to its structure. The definition of the reflective relation enriches the reconstruction of the case to the extent that it reveals the potential for transformation of the case structure.

Keywords

    Life practice, Objective hermeneutics, Positionality, Reconstruction, Robinson Crusoe

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Izvrševanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica? / Zizek, Boris.
In: Phainomena, Vol. 27, No. 104-105, 29.06.2018, p. 231-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Zizek B. Izvrševanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica? Phainomena. 2018 Jun 29;27(104-105):231-258. doi: 10.32022/PHI27.2018.104-105.10
Zizek, Boris. / Izvrševanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica?. In: Phainomena. 2018 ; Vol. 27, No. 104-105. pp. 231-258.
Download
@article{945de6baf91d44c296aeca07c735391c,
title = "Izvr{\v s}evanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica?",
abstract = "Objective data are distinguished from subjective data based on formulating the expressivity of human performance and its traces, whereby subjective data result from prospective and retrospective elaboration of reasons. Objective data are further differentiated into performances of the case (type 2) and performances of the life practice encompassing it (type 1). The interpretation of objective data of type 1 and 2 has a biographical focus on the case structure in its formative process, whereas the interpretation of type 2 objective data has a motivational focus and extrapolates from the positioning of a case to its disposition. The differentiation of objective data generally fulfills the function of correcting the self-interpretation of the case and establishes the possibility of defining the reflective relation of the case to its structure. The definition of the reflective relation enriches the reconstruction of the case to the extent that it reveals the potential for transformation of the case structure.",
keywords = "Life practice, Objective hermeneutics, Positionality, Reconstruction, Robinson Crusoe",
author = "Boris Zizek",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
day = "29",
doi = "10.32022/PHI27.2018.104-105.10",
language = "Slovenian",
volume = "27",
pages = "231--258",
number = "104-105",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Izvrševanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica?

AU - Zizek, Boris

PY - 2018/6/29

Y1 - 2018/6/29

N2 - Objective data are distinguished from subjective data based on formulating the expressivity of human performance and its traces, whereby subjective data result from prospective and retrospective elaboration of reasons. Objective data are further differentiated into performances of the case (type 2) and performances of the life practice encompassing it (type 1). The interpretation of objective data of type 1 and 2 has a biographical focus on the case structure in its formative process, whereas the interpretation of type 2 objective data has a motivational focus and extrapolates from the positioning of a case to its disposition. The differentiation of objective data generally fulfills the function of correcting the self-interpretation of the case and establishes the possibility of defining the reflective relation of the case to its structure. The definition of the reflective relation enriches the reconstruction of the case to the extent that it reveals the potential for transformation of the case structure.

AB - Objective data are distinguished from subjective data based on formulating the expressivity of human performance and its traces, whereby subjective data result from prospective and retrospective elaboration of reasons. Objective data are further differentiated into performances of the case (type 2) and performances of the life practice encompassing it (type 1). The interpretation of objective data of type 1 and 2 has a biographical focus on the case structure in its formative process, whereas the interpretation of type 2 objective data has a motivational focus and extrapolates from the positioning of a case to its disposition. The differentiation of objective data generally fulfills the function of correcting the self-interpretation of the case and establishes the possibility of defining the reflective relation of the case to its structure. The definition of the reflective relation enriches the reconstruction of the case to the extent that it reveals the potential for transformation of the case structure.

KW - Life practice

KW - Objective hermeneutics

KW - Positionality

KW - Reconstruction

KW - Robinson Crusoe

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053890610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.32022/PHI27.2018.104-105.10

DO - 10.32022/PHI27.2018.104-105.10

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053890610

VL - 27

SP - 231

EP - 258

JO - Phainomena

JF - Phainomena

SN - 1318-3362

IS - 104-105

ER -

By the same author(s)