Is the rhizosphere temporarily water repellent?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • University of California at Davis
  • University of Göttingen
  • Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR)
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health
  • University of Potsdam
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalVadose zone journal
Volume11
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Abstract

The rhizosphere has a controlling role in the flow of water and nutrients from soil to plant roots; however, its hydraulic properties are not well understood. As roots grow, they change the pore size distribution of the surrounding soil. Roots release polymeric substances such as mucilage into their rhizosphere. Microorganisms living in the rhizosphere feed on these organic materials and release other polymeric substances into the rhizosphere. The presence of these organic materials might affect the water retention proper-ties and the hydraulic conductivity of the rhizosphere soil during drying and rewetting. We used neutron radiography to monitor the dynamics of water distribution in the rhizosphere of lupin (Lupinus albus L.) plants during a period of drying and rewetting. The rhizosphere was shown to have a higher water content than the bulk soil during the drying period but a lower one during the subsequent rewetting. We evaluated the wettability of the bulk soil and the rhizosphere soil by measuring the contact angle of water in the soil. We found significantly higher contact angles for the rhizosphere soil than the bulk soil after drying, which indicates slight water repellency in the rhizosphere. This explains the lower soil water content in the rhizosphere than the bulk soil after rewetting. Our results suggest that the water holding capacity of the rhizosphere is dynamic and might shift toward higher or lower values than those of the surrounding bulk soil, not affected by roots, depending on the history of drying and rewetting cycles.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Is the rhizosphere temporarily water repellent? / Moradi, Ahmad B.; Carminati, Andrea; Lamparter, Axel et al.
In: Vadose zone journal, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Moradi, AB, Carminati, A, Lamparter, A, Woche, SK, Bachmann, J, Vetterlein, D, Vogel, HJ & Oswald, SE 2012, 'Is the rhizosphere temporarily water repellent?', Vadose zone journal, vol. 11, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2011.0120
Moradi, A. B., Carminati, A., Lamparter, A., Woche, S. K., Bachmann, J., Vetterlein, D., Vogel, H. J., & Oswald, S. E. (2012). Is the rhizosphere temporarily water repellent? Vadose zone journal, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2011.0120
Moradi AB, Carminati A, Lamparter A, Woche SK, Bachmann J, Vetterlein D et al. Is the rhizosphere temporarily water repellent? Vadose zone journal. 2012;11(3). doi: 10.2136/vzj2011.0120
Moradi, Ahmad B. ; Carminati, Andrea ; Lamparter, Axel et al. / Is the rhizosphere temporarily water repellent?. In: Vadose zone journal. 2012 ; Vol. 11, No. 3.
Download
@article{4f41603337bf48c896e7c45e5b08d466,
title = "Is the rhizosphere temporarily water repellent?",
abstract = "The rhizosphere has a controlling role in the flow of water and nutrients from soil to plant roots; however, its hydraulic properties are not well understood. As roots grow, they change the pore size distribution of the surrounding soil. Roots release polymeric substances such as mucilage into their rhizosphere. Microorganisms living in the rhizosphere feed on these organic materials and release other polymeric substances into the rhizosphere. The presence of these organic materials might affect the water retention proper-ties and the hydraulic conductivity of the rhizosphere soil during drying and rewetting. We used neutron radiography to monitor the dynamics of water distribution in the rhizosphere of lupin (Lupinus albus L.) plants during a period of drying and rewetting. The rhizosphere was shown to have a higher water content than the bulk soil during the drying period but a lower one during the subsequent rewetting. We evaluated the wettability of the bulk soil and the rhizosphere soil by measuring the contact angle of water in the soil. We found significantly higher contact angles for the rhizosphere soil than the bulk soil after drying, which indicates slight water repellency in the rhizosphere. This explains the lower soil water content in the rhizosphere than the bulk soil after rewetting. Our results suggest that the water holding capacity of the rhizosphere is dynamic and might shift toward higher or lower values than those of the surrounding bulk soil, not affected by roots, depending on the history of drying and rewetting cycles.",
author = "Moradi, {Ahmad B.} and Andrea Carminati and Axel Lamparter and Woche, {Susanne K.} and J{\"o}rg Bachmann and Doris Vetterlein and Vogel, {Hans J{\"o}rg} and Oswald, {Sascha E.}",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.2136/vzj2011.0120",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Vadose zone journal",
issn = "1539-1663",
publisher = "Soil Science Society of America",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the rhizosphere temporarily water repellent?

AU - Moradi, Ahmad B.

AU - Carminati, Andrea

AU - Lamparter, Axel

AU - Woche, Susanne K.

AU - Bachmann, Jörg

AU - Vetterlein, Doris

AU - Vogel, Hans Jörg

AU - Oswald, Sascha E.

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The rhizosphere has a controlling role in the flow of water and nutrients from soil to plant roots; however, its hydraulic properties are not well understood. As roots grow, they change the pore size distribution of the surrounding soil. Roots release polymeric substances such as mucilage into their rhizosphere. Microorganisms living in the rhizosphere feed on these organic materials and release other polymeric substances into the rhizosphere. The presence of these organic materials might affect the water retention proper-ties and the hydraulic conductivity of the rhizosphere soil during drying and rewetting. We used neutron radiography to monitor the dynamics of water distribution in the rhizosphere of lupin (Lupinus albus L.) plants during a period of drying and rewetting. The rhizosphere was shown to have a higher water content than the bulk soil during the drying period but a lower one during the subsequent rewetting. We evaluated the wettability of the bulk soil and the rhizosphere soil by measuring the contact angle of water in the soil. We found significantly higher contact angles for the rhizosphere soil than the bulk soil after drying, which indicates slight water repellency in the rhizosphere. This explains the lower soil water content in the rhizosphere than the bulk soil after rewetting. Our results suggest that the water holding capacity of the rhizosphere is dynamic and might shift toward higher or lower values than those of the surrounding bulk soil, not affected by roots, depending on the history of drying and rewetting cycles.

AB - The rhizosphere has a controlling role in the flow of water and nutrients from soil to plant roots; however, its hydraulic properties are not well understood. As roots grow, they change the pore size distribution of the surrounding soil. Roots release polymeric substances such as mucilage into their rhizosphere. Microorganisms living in the rhizosphere feed on these organic materials and release other polymeric substances into the rhizosphere. The presence of these organic materials might affect the water retention proper-ties and the hydraulic conductivity of the rhizosphere soil during drying and rewetting. We used neutron radiography to monitor the dynamics of water distribution in the rhizosphere of lupin (Lupinus albus L.) plants during a period of drying and rewetting. The rhizosphere was shown to have a higher water content than the bulk soil during the drying period but a lower one during the subsequent rewetting. We evaluated the wettability of the bulk soil and the rhizosphere soil by measuring the contact angle of water in the soil. We found significantly higher contact angles for the rhizosphere soil than the bulk soil after drying, which indicates slight water repellency in the rhizosphere. This explains the lower soil water content in the rhizosphere than the bulk soil after rewetting. Our results suggest that the water holding capacity of the rhizosphere is dynamic and might shift toward higher or lower values than those of the surrounding bulk soil, not affected by roots, depending on the history of drying and rewetting cycles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869450163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2136/vzj2011.0120

DO - 10.2136/vzj2011.0120

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84869450163

VL - 11

JO - Vadose zone journal

JF - Vadose zone journal

SN - 1539-1663

IS - 3

ER -

By the same author(s)