International vergleichende Forschung. Eine interdisziplinäre Metaanalyse disziplinärer Zugänge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Anna Kosmützky
  • Romy Wöhlert

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionInternational comparative research. An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of disciplinary approaches
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)496-524
Number of pages29
JournalSWS - Rundschau
Volume55
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Abstract

This article gathers methodological reflections on international comparisons, which were found in the method handbooks of the following disciplines: sociology; education; political science; communication and media sciences. The aim of this interdisciplinary meta-analysis is to review and to compare systematically the extent to which specific methods of comparison are being discussed in those handbooks, and which theoretical, methodological, and practical guidance they offer for design and implementation of international comparative studies. In that context, the article also analyses whether international comparison is classified as a method or a research design in the different disciplines, and to which extent these books also deal with specific aspects of the empirical research process. The study demonstrates that international comparative research designs could benefit from an interdisciplinary methodological assessment. Furthermore, the article shows that these texts almost completely ignore the level of collaboration.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

International vergleichende Forschung. Eine interdisziplinäre Metaanalyse disziplinärer Zugänge. / Kosmützky, Anna; Wöhlert, Romy.
In: SWS - Rundschau, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2015, p. 496-524.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Kosmützky, A & Wöhlert, R 2015, 'International vergleichende Forschung. Eine interdisziplinäre Metaanalyse disziplinärer Zugänge', SWS - Rundschau, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 496-524.
Kosmützky, A., & Wöhlert, R. (2015). International vergleichende Forschung. Eine interdisziplinäre Metaanalyse disziplinärer Zugänge. SWS - Rundschau, 55(4), 496-524.
Kosmützky, Anna ; Wöhlert, Romy. / International vergleichende Forschung. Eine interdisziplinäre Metaanalyse disziplinärer Zugänge. In: SWS - Rundschau. 2015 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 496-524.
Download
@article{a156dc62a73a4cfe89c2cc8ca027962e,
title = "International vergleichende Forschung. Eine interdisziplin{\"a}re Metaanalyse disziplin{\"a}rer Zug{\"a}nge",
abstract = "This article gathers methodological reflections on international comparisons, which were found in the method handbooks of the following disciplines: sociology; education; political science; communication and media sciences. The aim of this interdisciplinary meta-analysis is to review and to compare systematically the extent to which specific methods of comparison are being discussed in those handbooks, and which theoretical, methodological, and practical guidance they offer for design and implementation of international comparative studies. In that context, the article also analyses whether international comparison is classified as a method or a research design in the different disciplines, and to which extent these books also deal with specific aspects of the empirical research process. The study demonstrates that international comparative research designs could benefit from an interdisciplinary methodological assessment. Furthermore, the article shows that these texts almost completely ignore the level of collaboration.",
keywords = "Complex research design, International comparison, Literature study, Methodology, Methods of empirical social research",
author = "Anna Kosm{\"u}tzky and Romy W{\"o}hlert",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015, Sozialwissenschaftliche Studiengesellschaft, All Right Reserved.",
year = "2015",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "55",
pages = "496--524",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - International vergleichende Forschung. Eine interdisziplinäre Metaanalyse disziplinärer Zugänge

AU - Kosmützky, Anna

AU - Wöhlert, Romy

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2015, Sozialwissenschaftliche Studiengesellschaft, All Right Reserved.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article gathers methodological reflections on international comparisons, which were found in the method handbooks of the following disciplines: sociology; education; political science; communication and media sciences. The aim of this interdisciplinary meta-analysis is to review and to compare systematically the extent to which specific methods of comparison are being discussed in those handbooks, and which theoretical, methodological, and practical guidance they offer for design and implementation of international comparative studies. In that context, the article also analyses whether international comparison is classified as a method or a research design in the different disciplines, and to which extent these books also deal with specific aspects of the empirical research process. The study demonstrates that international comparative research designs could benefit from an interdisciplinary methodological assessment. Furthermore, the article shows that these texts almost completely ignore the level of collaboration.

AB - This article gathers methodological reflections on international comparisons, which were found in the method handbooks of the following disciplines: sociology; education; political science; communication and media sciences. The aim of this interdisciplinary meta-analysis is to review and to compare systematically the extent to which specific methods of comparison are being discussed in those handbooks, and which theoretical, methodological, and practical guidance they offer for design and implementation of international comparative studies. In that context, the article also analyses whether international comparison is classified as a method or a research design in the different disciplines, and to which extent these books also deal with specific aspects of the empirical research process. The study demonstrates that international comparative research designs could benefit from an interdisciplinary methodological assessment. Furthermore, the article shows that these texts almost completely ignore the level of collaboration.

KW - Complex research design

KW - International comparison

KW - Literature study

KW - Methodology

KW - Methods of empirical social research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020797998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Artikel

AN - SCOPUS:85020797998

VL - 55

SP - 496

EP - 524

JO - SWS - Rundschau

JF - SWS - Rundschau

SN - 1013-1469

IS - 4

ER -