Inter-annual water mass variations from GRACE in central Siberia

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Lantmäteriet - The Swedish Mapping, Cadastral, and Land Registration Authority
  • Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-299
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of geodesy
Volume87
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2013

Abstract

Our study analyses satellite and land-based observations of the Yakutsk region centred at the Lena watershed, an area characterised mainly by continuous permafrost. Using monthly solutions of the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment satellite mission, we detect a mass increase over central Siberia from 2002 to 2007 which reverses into a mass decrease between 2007 and 2011. No significant mass trend is visible for the whole observation period. To further quantify this behaviour, different mass signal components are studied in detail: (1) inter-annual variation in the atmospheric mass, (2) a possible effect of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), and (3) hydrological mass variations. In standard processing the atmospheric mass signal is reduced based on the data from numerical weather prediction models. We use surface pressure observations in order to validate this atmospheric reduction. On inter-annual time scale the difference between the atmospheric mass signal from model prediction and from surface pressure observation is <4 mm in equivalent water height. The effect of GIA on the mass signal over Siberia is calculated using a global ice model and a spherically symmetric, compressible, Maxwell-viscoelastic earth model. The calculation shows that for the investigated area any effect of GIA can be ruled out. Hence, the main part of the signal can be attributed to hydrological mass variations. We briefly discuss potential hydrological effects such as changes in precipitation, river discharge, surface and subsurface water storage.

Keywords

    Earth's system, GRACE, Hydrology, Mass transport, Permafrost

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Inter-annual water mass variations from GRACE in central Siberia. / Vey, Sibylle; Steffen, Holger; Müller, Jürgen et al.
In: Journal of geodesy, Vol. 87, No. 3, 31.12.2013, p. 287-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Vey S, Steffen H, Müller J, Boike J. Inter-annual water mass variations from GRACE in central Siberia. Journal of geodesy. 2013 Dec 31;87(3):287-299. doi: 10.1007/s00190-012-0597-9
Vey, Sibylle ; Steffen, Holger ; Müller, Jürgen et al. / Inter-annual water mass variations from GRACE in central Siberia. In: Journal of geodesy. 2013 ; Vol. 87, No. 3. pp. 287-299.
Download
@article{65db9eb2f9b5497691959cdc48aa107b,
title = "Inter-annual water mass variations from GRACE in central Siberia",
abstract = "Our study analyses satellite and land-based observations of the Yakutsk region centred at the Lena watershed, an area characterised mainly by continuous permafrost. Using monthly solutions of the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment satellite mission, we detect a mass increase over central Siberia from 2002 to 2007 which reverses into a mass decrease between 2007 and 2011. No significant mass trend is visible for the whole observation period. To further quantify this behaviour, different mass signal components are studied in detail: (1) inter-annual variation in the atmospheric mass, (2) a possible effect of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), and (3) hydrological mass variations. In standard processing the atmospheric mass signal is reduced based on the data from numerical weather prediction models. We use surface pressure observations in order to validate this atmospheric reduction. On inter-annual time scale the difference between the atmospheric mass signal from model prediction and from surface pressure observation is <4 mm in equivalent water height. The effect of GIA on the mass signal over Siberia is calculated using a global ice model and a spherically symmetric, compressible, Maxwell-viscoelastic earth model. The calculation shows that for the investigated area any effect of GIA can be ruled out. Hence, the main part of the signal can be attributed to hydrological mass variations. We briefly discuss potential hydrological effects such as changes in precipitation, river discharge, surface and subsurface water storage.",
keywords = "Earth's system, GRACE, Hydrology, Mass transport, Permafrost",
author = "Sibylle Vey and Holger Steffen and J{\"u}rgen M{\"u}ller and Julia Boike",
year = "2013",
month = dec,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/s00190-012-0597-9",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "287--299",
journal = "Journal of geodesy",
issn = "0949-7714",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inter-annual water mass variations from GRACE in central Siberia

AU - Vey, Sibylle

AU - Steffen, Holger

AU - Müller, Jürgen

AU - Boike, Julia

PY - 2013/12/31

Y1 - 2013/12/31

N2 - Our study analyses satellite and land-based observations of the Yakutsk region centred at the Lena watershed, an area characterised mainly by continuous permafrost. Using monthly solutions of the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment satellite mission, we detect a mass increase over central Siberia from 2002 to 2007 which reverses into a mass decrease between 2007 and 2011. No significant mass trend is visible for the whole observation period. To further quantify this behaviour, different mass signal components are studied in detail: (1) inter-annual variation in the atmospheric mass, (2) a possible effect of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), and (3) hydrological mass variations. In standard processing the atmospheric mass signal is reduced based on the data from numerical weather prediction models. We use surface pressure observations in order to validate this atmospheric reduction. On inter-annual time scale the difference between the atmospheric mass signal from model prediction and from surface pressure observation is <4 mm in equivalent water height. The effect of GIA on the mass signal over Siberia is calculated using a global ice model and a spherically symmetric, compressible, Maxwell-viscoelastic earth model. The calculation shows that for the investigated area any effect of GIA can be ruled out. Hence, the main part of the signal can be attributed to hydrological mass variations. We briefly discuss potential hydrological effects such as changes in precipitation, river discharge, surface and subsurface water storage.

AB - Our study analyses satellite and land-based observations of the Yakutsk region centred at the Lena watershed, an area characterised mainly by continuous permafrost. Using monthly solutions of the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment satellite mission, we detect a mass increase over central Siberia from 2002 to 2007 which reverses into a mass decrease between 2007 and 2011. No significant mass trend is visible for the whole observation period. To further quantify this behaviour, different mass signal components are studied in detail: (1) inter-annual variation in the atmospheric mass, (2) a possible effect of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), and (3) hydrological mass variations. In standard processing the atmospheric mass signal is reduced based on the data from numerical weather prediction models. We use surface pressure observations in order to validate this atmospheric reduction. On inter-annual time scale the difference between the atmospheric mass signal from model prediction and from surface pressure observation is <4 mm in equivalent water height. The effect of GIA on the mass signal over Siberia is calculated using a global ice model and a spherically symmetric, compressible, Maxwell-viscoelastic earth model. The calculation shows that for the investigated area any effect of GIA can be ruled out. Hence, the main part of the signal can be attributed to hydrological mass variations. We briefly discuss potential hydrological effects such as changes in precipitation, river discharge, surface and subsurface water storage.

KW - Earth's system

KW - GRACE

KW - Hydrology

KW - Mass transport

KW - Permafrost

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874112463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00190-012-0597-9

DO - 10.1007/s00190-012-0597-9

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84874112463

VL - 87

SP - 287

EP - 299

JO - Journal of geodesy

JF - Journal of geodesy

SN - 0949-7714

IS - 3

ER -

By the same author(s)