Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part II: Sensitivity studies with a spectral bin microphysics and a Lagrangian cloud model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Theres Riechelmann
  • Ulrike Wacker
  • Klaus D. Beheng
  • Dieter Etling
  • Siegfried Raasch

External Research Organisations

  • Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-311
Number of pages19
JournalMeteorologische Zeitschrift
Volume24
Issue number3
Early online date4 Apr 2015
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2015

Abstract

Raindrops in warm clouds grow faster than predicted by classical cloud models. One of the possible reasons for this discrepancy is the influence of cloud turbulence on the coagulation process. In Part I (Siewert et al., 2014) of this paper series, a turbulent collision kernel has been derived from wind tunnel experiments and direct numerical simulations (DNS). Here we use this new collision kernel to investigate the influence of turbulence on coagulation and rain formation using two models of different complexity: a one-dimensional model called RAINSHAFT (height as coordinate) with cloud microphysics treated by a spectral bin model (BIN) and a large-eddy simulation (LES) model with cloud microphysics treated by Lagrangian particles (a so called Lagrangian Cloud Model, LCM). Simulations are performed for the case of no turbulence and for two situations with moderate and with extremely strong turbulence. The idealized 0- and 1-dimensional runs show, that large drops grow faster in the case turbulence is taken into account in the cloud microphysics, as was also found by earlier investigations of other groups. For moderate turbulence intensity, the acceleration is only weak, while it is more significant for strong turbulence. From the model intercomparison it turns out, that the BIN model produced large drops much faster than the LCM, independent of turbulence intensity. The differences are larger than those due to a variation in turbulence intensities. The diverging rate of formation of large drops is due to the use of different growth models for the coagulation process, i.e. the quasi-stochastic model in the spectral BIN model and the continuous growth model in LCM. From the results of this model intercomparison it is concluded, that the coagulation process has to be improved in future versions of the LCM. The LES-LCM model was also applied to the simulation of a single 3-D cumulus cloud. It turned out, that the effect of turbulence on drop formation was even smaller as the turbulence within the cloud was weaker than prescribed in the idealized cases. In summary, the use of the new turbulent collision kernel derived in Part I does enhance rain formation under typical turbulence conditions found in natural clouds but the effect is not very striking.

Keywords

    Drop collision, Lagrangian cloud model, Spectral bin model, Turbulence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part II: Sensitivity studies with a spectral bin microphysics and a Lagrangian cloud model. / Riechelmann, Theres; Wacker, Ulrike; Beheng, Klaus D. et al.
In: Meteorologische Zeitschrift, Vol. 24, No. 3, 16.07.2015, p. 293-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Riechelmann T, Wacker U, Beheng KD, Etling D, Raasch S. Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part II: Sensitivity studies with a spectral bin microphysics and a Lagrangian cloud model. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 2015 Jul 16;24(3):293-311. Epub 2015 Apr 4. doi: 10.1127/metz/2015/0608
Download
@article{2127318f46c34791b594eaa7b7d9e765,
title = "Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part II: Sensitivity studies with a spectral bin microphysics and a Lagrangian cloud model",
abstract = "Raindrops in warm clouds grow faster than predicted by classical cloud models. One of the possible reasons for this discrepancy is the influence of cloud turbulence on the coagulation process. In Part I (Siewert et al., 2014) of this paper series, a turbulent collision kernel has been derived from wind tunnel experiments and direct numerical simulations (DNS). Here we use this new collision kernel to investigate the influence of turbulence on coagulation and rain formation using two models of different complexity: a one-dimensional model called RAINSHAFT (height as coordinate) with cloud microphysics treated by a spectral bin model (BIN) and a large-eddy simulation (LES) model with cloud microphysics treated by Lagrangian particles (a so called Lagrangian Cloud Model, LCM). Simulations are performed for the case of no turbulence and for two situations with moderate and with extremely strong turbulence. The idealized 0- and 1-dimensional runs show, that large drops grow faster in the case turbulence is taken into account in the cloud microphysics, as was also found by earlier investigations of other groups. For moderate turbulence intensity, the acceleration is only weak, while it is more significant for strong turbulence. From the model intercomparison it turns out, that the BIN model produced large drops much faster than the LCM, independent of turbulence intensity. The differences are larger than those due to a variation in turbulence intensities. The diverging rate of formation of large drops is due to the use of different growth models for the coagulation process, i.e. the quasi-stochastic model in the spectral BIN model and the continuous growth model in LCM. From the results of this model intercomparison it is concluded, that the coagulation process has to be improved in future versions of the LCM. The LES-LCM model was also applied to the simulation of a single 3-D cumulus cloud. It turned out, that the effect of turbulence on drop formation was even smaller as the turbulence within the cloud was weaker than prescribed in the idealized cases. In summary, the use of the new turbulent collision kernel derived in Part I does enhance rain formation under typical turbulence conditions found in natural clouds but the effect is not very striking.",
keywords = "Drop collision, Lagrangian cloud model, Spectral bin model, Turbulence",
author = "Theres Riechelmann and Ulrike Wacker and Beheng, {Klaus D.} and Dieter Etling and Siegfried Raasch",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1127/metz/2015/0608",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "293--311",
journal = "Meteorologische Zeitschrift",
issn = "0941-2948",
publisher = "Gebruder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part II

T2 - Sensitivity studies with a spectral bin microphysics and a Lagrangian cloud model

AU - Riechelmann, Theres

AU - Wacker, Ulrike

AU - Beheng, Klaus D.

AU - Etling, Dieter

AU - Raasch, Siegfried

PY - 2015/7/16

Y1 - 2015/7/16

N2 - Raindrops in warm clouds grow faster than predicted by classical cloud models. One of the possible reasons for this discrepancy is the influence of cloud turbulence on the coagulation process. In Part I (Siewert et al., 2014) of this paper series, a turbulent collision kernel has been derived from wind tunnel experiments and direct numerical simulations (DNS). Here we use this new collision kernel to investigate the influence of turbulence on coagulation and rain formation using two models of different complexity: a one-dimensional model called RAINSHAFT (height as coordinate) with cloud microphysics treated by a spectral bin model (BIN) and a large-eddy simulation (LES) model with cloud microphysics treated by Lagrangian particles (a so called Lagrangian Cloud Model, LCM). Simulations are performed for the case of no turbulence and for two situations with moderate and with extremely strong turbulence. The idealized 0- and 1-dimensional runs show, that large drops grow faster in the case turbulence is taken into account in the cloud microphysics, as was also found by earlier investigations of other groups. For moderate turbulence intensity, the acceleration is only weak, while it is more significant for strong turbulence. From the model intercomparison it turns out, that the BIN model produced large drops much faster than the LCM, independent of turbulence intensity. The differences are larger than those due to a variation in turbulence intensities. The diverging rate of formation of large drops is due to the use of different growth models for the coagulation process, i.e. the quasi-stochastic model in the spectral BIN model and the continuous growth model in LCM. From the results of this model intercomparison it is concluded, that the coagulation process has to be improved in future versions of the LCM. The LES-LCM model was also applied to the simulation of a single 3-D cumulus cloud. It turned out, that the effect of turbulence on drop formation was even smaller as the turbulence within the cloud was weaker than prescribed in the idealized cases. In summary, the use of the new turbulent collision kernel derived in Part I does enhance rain formation under typical turbulence conditions found in natural clouds but the effect is not very striking.

AB - Raindrops in warm clouds grow faster than predicted by classical cloud models. One of the possible reasons for this discrepancy is the influence of cloud turbulence on the coagulation process. In Part I (Siewert et al., 2014) of this paper series, a turbulent collision kernel has been derived from wind tunnel experiments and direct numerical simulations (DNS). Here we use this new collision kernel to investigate the influence of turbulence on coagulation and rain formation using two models of different complexity: a one-dimensional model called RAINSHAFT (height as coordinate) with cloud microphysics treated by a spectral bin model (BIN) and a large-eddy simulation (LES) model with cloud microphysics treated by Lagrangian particles (a so called Lagrangian Cloud Model, LCM). Simulations are performed for the case of no turbulence and for two situations with moderate and with extremely strong turbulence. The idealized 0- and 1-dimensional runs show, that large drops grow faster in the case turbulence is taken into account in the cloud microphysics, as was also found by earlier investigations of other groups. For moderate turbulence intensity, the acceleration is only weak, while it is more significant for strong turbulence. From the model intercomparison it turns out, that the BIN model produced large drops much faster than the LCM, independent of turbulence intensity. The differences are larger than those due to a variation in turbulence intensities. The diverging rate of formation of large drops is due to the use of different growth models for the coagulation process, i.e. the quasi-stochastic model in the spectral BIN model and the continuous growth model in LCM. From the results of this model intercomparison it is concluded, that the coagulation process has to be improved in future versions of the LCM. The LES-LCM model was also applied to the simulation of a single 3-D cumulus cloud. It turned out, that the effect of turbulence on drop formation was even smaller as the turbulence within the cloud was weaker than prescribed in the idealized cases. In summary, the use of the new turbulent collision kernel derived in Part I does enhance rain formation under typical turbulence conditions found in natural clouds but the effect is not very striking.

KW - Drop collision

KW - Lagrangian cloud model

KW - Spectral bin model

KW - Turbulence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937200810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1127/metz/2015/0608

DO - 10.1127/metz/2015/0608

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937200810

VL - 24

SP - 293

EP - 311

JO - Meteorologische Zeitschrift

JF - Meteorologische Zeitschrift

SN - 0941-2948

IS - 3

ER -