Influence of Hip Prosthesis Size and Its Coating Area on Bone Remodeling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • B. A. Behrens
  • A. Bouguecha
  • M. Lerch
  • H. Windhagen
  • A. Almohallami

External Research Organisations

  • Hannover Medical School (MHH)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number8031022
Pages (from-to)703-707
Number of pages5
JournalIEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience
Volume16
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 11 Sept 2017

Abstract

We developed a numerical model to describe the bone remodeling process in periprosthetic bone tissues and validated it by means of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry methods with different types of hip implants. In this paper, we applied the numerical model to investigate the influence of implant size and of the size of the porous coated area on bone remodeling in a periprosthetic human femur in an effort to define properties of implants, which would reduce bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty. Two different sizes of a newly designed implant and three different coating area sizes were investigated in this paper. The results show that the smaller the implant, the less bone remodeling occurs. Reducing prosthesis size by 2mm from all sides has decreased bone remodeling by 14.4%. Extending the coating area on both, lateral and medial parts of the implant, has decreased bone remodeling in the lateral part of the femur and increased it in the medial part. In conclusion, depending on these results, the oversized hip replacement would cause more bone resorption in the femur. Concerning the coating area, the manufacturer must find a compromise between the small coating area with less bone remodeling in the medial part of the femur as well as less primary stability and the bigger coating area with less bone remodeling in the lateral part of the femur, but with higher bone remodeling in its medial part and more primary stability.

Keywords

    Bone remodelling, finite element, implant size, porous coating area, short stem hip implant

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Influence of Hip Prosthesis Size and Its Coating Area on Bone Remodeling. / Behrens, B. A.; Bouguecha, A.; Lerch, M. et al.
In: IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, Vol. 16, No. 8, 8031022, 11.09.2017, p. 703-707.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Behrens, BA, Bouguecha, A, Lerch, M, Windhagen, H & Almohallami, A 2017, 'Influence of Hip Prosthesis Size and Its Coating Area on Bone Remodeling', IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, vol. 16, no. 8, 8031022, pp. 703-707. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnb.2017.2750724
Behrens, B. A., Bouguecha, A., Lerch, M., Windhagen, H., & Almohallami, A. (2017). Influence of Hip Prosthesis Size and Its Coating Area on Bone Remodeling. IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, 16(8), 703-707. Article 8031022. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnb.2017.2750724
Behrens BA, Bouguecha A, Lerch M, Windhagen H, Almohallami A. Influence of Hip Prosthesis Size and Its Coating Area on Bone Remodeling. IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience. 2017 Sept 11;16(8):703-707. 8031022. doi: 10.1109/tnb.2017.2750724
Behrens, B. A. ; Bouguecha, A. ; Lerch, M. et al. / Influence of Hip Prosthesis Size and Its Coating Area on Bone Remodeling. In: IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience. 2017 ; Vol. 16, No. 8. pp. 703-707.
Download
@article{684905c1fbd4434f8811788d310e69db,
title = "Influence of Hip Prosthesis Size and Its Coating Area on Bone Remodeling",
abstract = "We developed a numerical model to describe the bone remodeling process in periprosthetic bone tissues and validated it by means of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry methods with different types of hip implants. In this paper, we applied the numerical model to investigate the influence of implant size and of the size of the porous coated area on bone remodeling in a periprosthetic human femur in an effort to define properties of implants, which would reduce bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty. Two different sizes of a newly designed implant and three different coating area sizes were investigated in this paper. The results show that the smaller the implant, the less bone remodeling occurs. Reducing prosthesis size by 2mm from all sides has decreased bone remodeling by 14.4%. Extending the coating area on both, lateral and medial parts of the implant, has decreased bone remodeling in the lateral part of the femur and increased it in the medial part. In conclusion, depending on these results, the oversized hip replacement would cause more bone resorption in the femur. Concerning the coating area, the manufacturer must find a compromise between the small coating area with less bone remodeling in the medial part of the femur as well as less primary stability and the bigger coating area with less bone remodeling in the lateral part of the femur, but with higher bone remodeling in its medial part and more primary stability.",
keywords = "Bone remodelling, finite element, implant size, porous coating area, short stem hip implant",
author = "Behrens, {B. A.} and A. Bouguecha and M. Lerch and H. Windhagen and A. Almohallami",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
day = "11",
doi = "10.1109/tnb.2017.2750724",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "703--707",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience",
issn = "1536-1241",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "8",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of Hip Prosthesis Size and Its Coating Area on Bone Remodeling

AU - Behrens, B. A.

AU - Bouguecha, A.

AU - Lerch, M.

AU - Windhagen, H.

AU - Almohallami, A.

PY - 2017/9/11

Y1 - 2017/9/11

N2 - We developed a numerical model to describe the bone remodeling process in periprosthetic bone tissues and validated it by means of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry methods with different types of hip implants. In this paper, we applied the numerical model to investigate the influence of implant size and of the size of the porous coated area on bone remodeling in a periprosthetic human femur in an effort to define properties of implants, which would reduce bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty. Two different sizes of a newly designed implant and three different coating area sizes were investigated in this paper. The results show that the smaller the implant, the less bone remodeling occurs. Reducing prosthesis size by 2mm from all sides has decreased bone remodeling by 14.4%. Extending the coating area on both, lateral and medial parts of the implant, has decreased bone remodeling in the lateral part of the femur and increased it in the medial part. In conclusion, depending on these results, the oversized hip replacement would cause more bone resorption in the femur. Concerning the coating area, the manufacturer must find a compromise between the small coating area with less bone remodeling in the medial part of the femur as well as less primary stability and the bigger coating area with less bone remodeling in the lateral part of the femur, but with higher bone remodeling in its medial part and more primary stability.

AB - We developed a numerical model to describe the bone remodeling process in periprosthetic bone tissues and validated it by means of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry methods with different types of hip implants. In this paper, we applied the numerical model to investigate the influence of implant size and of the size of the porous coated area on bone remodeling in a periprosthetic human femur in an effort to define properties of implants, which would reduce bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty. Two different sizes of a newly designed implant and three different coating area sizes were investigated in this paper. The results show that the smaller the implant, the less bone remodeling occurs. Reducing prosthesis size by 2mm from all sides has decreased bone remodeling by 14.4%. Extending the coating area on both, lateral and medial parts of the implant, has decreased bone remodeling in the lateral part of the femur and increased it in the medial part. In conclusion, depending on these results, the oversized hip replacement would cause more bone resorption in the femur. Concerning the coating area, the manufacturer must find a compromise between the small coating area with less bone remodeling in the medial part of the femur as well as less primary stability and the bigger coating area with less bone remodeling in the lateral part of the femur, but with higher bone remodeling in its medial part and more primary stability.

KW - Bone remodelling

KW - finite element

KW - implant size

KW - porous coating area

KW - short stem hip implant

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041055618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/tnb.2017.2750724

DO - 10.1109/tnb.2017.2750724

M3 - Article

C2 - 28910774

AN - SCOPUS:85041055618

VL - 16

SP - 703

EP - 707

JO - IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience

JF - IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience

SN - 1536-1241

IS - 8

M1 - 8031022

ER -