Influence of exercise training mode on arterial diameter: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Cardiff Metropolitan University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-80
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date25 Dec 2014
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Objectives: To examine whether differences in arterial diameter exist between athletes participating in endurance, resistance or mixed exercise training. Design: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods: Random effects meta-analyses of the weighted mean difference in aortic, carotid, brachial and femoral arterial diameters, height and body mass were conducted on data from 16 peer-reviewed studies indexed on PubMed, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Sport Discus. Effect sizes were calculated as the standardised difference in means (δ), and used to compare endurance (n=163), resistance (n=192), and mixed trained athletes (n=360), with controls (n=440). Results: Compared to controls, endurance athletes displayed the greatest difference in diameter in the brachial artery (δ=1.84, 95% CI: 0.59, 3.09, p< 0.01), whereas for mixed athletes, the greatest difference in diameter occurred in the femoral artery (δ=3.65, 95% CI: 2.21, 5.10, p< 0.01), despite there being no differences in height or body mass between these groups. Resistance athletes had a significantly greater body mass (p=0.047) and aortic diameter (δ=1.81, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.05, p< 0.01) than controls, however differences in other vessels could not be determined through meta-analysis due to insufficient data. Conclusions: Our results provide evidence for localised arterial differences, which occur more extensively in peripheral vessels (brachial and femoral). Chronically, vascular remodelling may occur as a result of the specific haemodynamic conditions within each vessel, which likely differs depending on the mode of exercise. In the future, empirical research is needed to understand the effect of resistance training on chronic vascular remodelling, as this is not well documented.

Keywords

    Artery, Exercise adaptation, Remodelling, Structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Influence of exercise training mode on arterial diameter: A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Black, Jane M.; Stöhr, Eric J.; Shave, Rob et al.
In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 74-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Black JM, Stöhr EJ, Shave R, Esformes JI. Influence of exercise training mode on arterial diameter: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2016 Jan 1;19(1):74-80. Epub 2014 Dec 25. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.007
Download
@article{d6f9a114c2364a8989418c03665a0042,
title = "Influence of exercise training mode on arterial diameter: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objectives: To examine whether differences in arterial diameter exist between athletes participating in endurance, resistance or mixed exercise training. Design: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods: Random effects meta-analyses of the weighted mean difference in aortic, carotid, brachial and femoral arterial diameters, height and body mass were conducted on data from 16 peer-reviewed studies indexed on PubMed, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Sport Discus. Effect sizes were calculated as the standardised difference in means (δ), and used to compare endurance (n=163), resistance (n=192), and mixed trained athletes (n=360), with controls (n=440). Results: Compared to controls, endurance athletes displayed the greatest difference in diameter in the brachial artery (δ=1.84, 95% CI: 0.59, 3.09, p< 0.01), whereas for mixed athletes, the greatest difference in diameter occurred in the femoral artery (δ=3.65, 95% CI: 2.21, 5.10, p< 0.01), despite there being no differences in height or body mass between these groups. Resistance athletes had a significantly greater body mass (p=0.047) and aortic diameter (δ=1.81, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.05, p< 0.01) than controls, however differences in other vessels could not be determined through meta-analysis due to insufficient data. Conclusions: Our results provide evidence for localised arterial differences, which occur more extensively in peripheral vessels (brachial and femoral). Chronically, vascular remodelling may occur as a result of the specific haemodynamic conditions within each vessel, which likely differs depending on the mode of exercise. In the future, empirical research is needed to understand the effect of resistance training on chronic vascular remodelling, as this is not well documented.",
keywords = "Artery, Exercise adaptation, Remodelling, Structure",
author = "Black, {Jane M.} and St{\"o}hr, {Eric J.} and Rob Shave and Esformes, {Joseph I.}",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.007",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "74--80",
journal = "Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport",
issn = "1440-2440",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of exercise training mode on arterial diameter

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Black, Jane M.

AU - Stöhr, Eric J.

AU - Shave, Rob

AU - Esformes, Joseph I.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objectives: To examine whether differences in arterial diameter exist between athletes participating in endurance, resistance or mixed exercise training. Design: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods: Random effects meta-analyses of the weighted mean difference in aortic, carotid, brachial and femoral arterial diameters, height and body mass were conducted on data from 16 peer-reviewed studies indexed on PubMed, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Sport Discus. Effect sizes were calculated as the standardised difference in means (δ), and used to compare endurance (n=163), resistance (n=192), and mixed trained athletes (n=360), with controls (n=440). Results: Compared to controls, endurance athletes displayed the greatest difference in diameter in the brachial artery (δ=1.84, 95% CI: 0.59, 3.09, p< 0.01), whereas for mixed athletes, the greatest difference in diameter occurred in the femoral artery (δ=3.65, 95% CI: 2.21, 5.10, p< 0.01), despite there being no differences in height or body mass between these groups. Resistance athletes had a significantly greater body mass (p=0.047) and aortic diameter (δ=1.81, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.05, p< 0.01) than controls, however differences in other vessels could not be determined through meta-analysis due to insufficient data. Conclusions: Our results provide evidence for localised arterial differences, which occur more extensively in peripheral vessels (brachial and femoral). Chronically, vascular remodelling may occur as a result of the specific haemodynamic conditions within each vessel, which likely differs depending on the mode of exercise. In the future, empirical research is needed to understand the effect of resistance training on chronic vascular remodelling, as this is not well documented.

AB - Objectives: To examine whether differences in arterial diameter exist between athletes participating in endurance, resistance or mixed exercise training. Design: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods: Random effects meta-analyses of the weighted mean difference in aortic, carotid, brachial and femoral arterial diameters, height and body mass were conducted on data from 16 peer-reviewed studies indexed on PubMed, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Sport Discus. Effect sizes were calculated as the standardised difference in means (δ), and used to compare endurance (n=163), resistance (n=192), and mixed trained athletes (n=360), with controls (n=440). Results: Compared to controls, endurance athletes displayed the greatest difference in diameter in the brachial artery (δ=1.84, 95% CI: 0.59, 3.09, p< 0.01), whereas for mixed athletes, the greatest difference in diameter occurred in the femoral artery (δ=3.65, 95% CI: 2.21, 5.10, p< 0.01), despite there being no differences in height or body mass between these groups. Resistance athletes had a significantly greater body mass (p=0.047) and aortic diameter (δ=1.81, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.05, p< 0.01) than controls, however differences in other vessels could not be determined through meta-analysis due to insufficient data. Conclusions: Our results provide evidence for localised arterial differences, which occur more extensively in peripheral vessels (brachial and femoral). Chronically, vascular remodelling may occur as a result of the specific haemodynamic conditions within each vessel, which likely differs depending on the mode of exercise. In the future, empirical research is needed to understand the effect of resistance training on chronic vascular remodelling, as this is not well documented.

KW - Artery

KW - Exercise adaptation

KW - Remodelling

KW - Structure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948118740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.007

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25579977

AN - SCOPUS:84948118740

VL - 19

SP - 74

EP - 80

JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

SN - 1440-2440

IS - 1

ER -

By the same author(s)