Individualism in global airspace-user-preferred trajectories in future ATM

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Alexander Kuenz
  • Gunnar Schwoch
  • Franz Erich Wolter

External Research Organisations

  • German Aerospace Center (DLR)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference
Subtitle of host publicationDASC 2013
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages1E11-1E113
Number of pages13
ISBN (electronic)9781479915385
ISBN (print)978-1-4799-1536-1
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Event2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, DASC 2013 - East Syracuse, United States
Duration: 5 Oct 201310 Oct 2013

Publication series

NameAIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference - Proceedings
ISSN (Print)2155-7195
ISSN (electronic)2155-7209

Abstract

Both future air traffic management programs SESAR and NextGen foresee trajectory based operations as one of the major enablers for more efficient handling of air traffic. Furthermore, both initiatives claim to support user preferred trajectories. However, using a common airspace it is unlikely to get a conflict-free scenario from independently optimized trajectories. This paper investigates if the concept of user-preferred trajectories is feasible, and what constraints are necessary to reach a conflict-free global scenario based on independently optimized trajectories. Based on a traffic scenario with ∼33k individually optimized trajectories yielding ∼29k conflicts, a strategic resolution is performed generating least possible penalties for involved aircraft. The main technique for solving conflicts is shifting whole flights in time by a few minutes. Direct and recursive algorithms are presented; a focus is put on solving airport-related conflicts first. More than 94% of all conflicts can be solved by shifting whole flights in time respecting a maximum offset of 10 minutes.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Individualism in global airspace-user-preferred trajectories in future ATM. / Kuenz, Alexander; Schwoch, Gunnar; Wolter, Franz Erich.
2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference: DASC 2013. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2013. p. 1E11-1E113 6712525 (AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference - Proceedings).

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Kuenz, A, Schwoch, G & Wolter, FE 2013, Individualism in global airspace-user-preferred trajectories in future ATM. in 2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference: DASC 2013., 6712525, AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference - Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 1E11-1E113, 2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, DASC 2013, East Syracuse, New York, United States, 5 Oct 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2013.6712525
Kuenz, A., Schwoch, G., & Wolter, F. E. (2013). Individualism in global airspace-user-preferred trajectories in future ATM. In 2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference: DASC 2013 (pp. 1E11-1E113). Article 6712525 (AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference - Proceedings). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2013.6712525
Kuenz A, Schwoch G, Wolter FE. Individualism in global airspace-user-preferred trajectories in future ATM. In 2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference: DASC 2013. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2013. p. 1E11-1E113. 6712525. (AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference - Proceedings). doi: 10.1109/DASC.2013.6712525
Kuenz, Alexander ; Schwoch, Gunnar ; Wolter, Franz Erich. / Individualism in global airspace-user-preferred trajectories in future ATM. 2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference: DASC 2013. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2013. pp. 1E11-1E113 (AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference - Proceedings).
Download
@inproceedings{c07d820edaf545cdb8623422d27dbedd,
title = "Individualism in global airspace-user-preferred trajectories in future ATM",
abstract = "Both future air traffic management programs SESAR and NextGen foresee trajectory based operations as one of the major enablers for more efficient handling of air traffic. Furthermore, both initiatives claim to support user preferred trajectories. However, using a common airspace it is unlikely to get a conflict-free scenario from independently optimized trajectories. This paper investigates if the concept of user-preferred trajectories is feasible, and what constraints are necessary to reach a conflict-free global scenario based on independently optimized trajectories. Based on a traffic scenario with ∼33k individually optimized trajectories yielding ∼29k conflicts, a strategic resolution is performed generating least possible penalties for involved aircraft. The main technique for solving conflicts is shifting whole flights in time by a few minutes. Direct and recursive algorithms are presented; a focus is put on solving airport-related conflicts first. More than 94% of all conflicts can be solved by shifting whole flights in time respecting a maximum offset of 10 minutes.",
author = "Alexander Kuenz and Gunnar Schwoch and Wolter, {Franz Erich}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1109/DASC.2013.6712525",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-4799-1536-1",
series = "AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference - Proceedings",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
pages = "1E11--1E113",
booktitle = "2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference",
address = "United States",
note = "2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, DASC 2013 ; Conference date: 05-10-2013 Through 10-10-2013",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Individualism in global airspace-user-preferred trajectories in future ATM

AU - Kuenz, Alexander

AU - Schwoch, Gunnar

AU - Wolter, Franz Erich

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Both future air traffic management programs SESAR and NextGen foresee trajectory based operations as one of the major enablers for more efficient handling of air traffic. Furthermore, both initiatives claim to support user preferred trajectories. However, using a common airspace it is unlikely to get a conflict-free scenario from independently optimized trajectories. This paper investigates if the concept of user-preferred trajectories is feasible, and what constraints are necessary to reach a conflict-free global scenario based on independently optimized trajectories. Based on a traffic scenario with ∼33k individually optimized trajectories yielding ∼29k conflicts, a strategic resolution is performed generating least possible penalties for involved aircraft. The main technique for solving conflicts is shifting whole flights in time by a few minutes. Direct and recursive algorithms are presented; a focus is put on solving airport-related conflicts first. More than 94% of all conflicts can be solved by shifting whole flights in time respecting a maximum offset of 10 minutes.

AB - Both future air traffic management programs SESAR and NextGen foresee trajectory based operations as one of the major enablers for more efficient handling of air traffic. Furthermore, both initiatives claim to support user preferred trajectories. However, using a common airspace it is unlikely to get a conflict-free scenario from independently optimized trajectories. This paper investigates if the concept of user-preferred trajectories is feasible, and what constraints are necessary to reach a conflict-free global scenario based on independently optimized trajectories. Based on a traffic scenario with ∼33k individually optimized trajectories yielding ∼29k conflicts, a strategic resolution is performed generating least possible penalties for involved aircraft. The main technique for solving conflicts is shifting whole flights in time by a few minutes. Direct and recursive algorithms are presented; a focus is put on solving airport-related conflicts first. More than 94% of all conflicts can be solved by shifting whole flights in time respecting a maximum offset of 10 minutes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894469951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/DASC.2013.6712525

DO - 10.1109/DASC.2013.6712525

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84894469951

SN - 978-1-4799-1536-1

T3 - AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference - Proceedings

SP - 1E11-1E113

BT - 2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

T2 - 2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, DASC 2013

Y2 - 5 October 2013 through 10 October 2013

ER -