Impaired angiogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells during exposure to the resinous monomer triethylene glycol dimethacrylate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Peter Schertl
  • Joachim Volk
  • Renke Perduns
  • Knut Adam
  • Gabriele Leyhausen
  • Athina Bakopoulou
  • Werner Geurtsen

External Research Organisations

  • Hannover Medical School (MHH)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (A.U.Th.)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-155
Number of pages12
JournalDental Materials
Volume35
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) can differentiate into tissue specific lineages to support dental pulp regeneration after injuries. Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) is a widely used co-monomer in restorative dentistry with adverse effects on cellular metabolism. Aim of this study was to analyze the impact of TEGDMA on the angiogenic differentiation potential of DPSCs.

METHODS: DPSCs were characterized by flow cytometry. Short-term (max. 72h) cytotoxicity of TEGDMA was assessed by MTT assay. To evaluate TEGDMA effects on angiogenic differentiation, DPSCs were cultivated in angiogenic differentiation medium (ADM) in the presence or absence of short-term non-toxic TEGDMA concentrations (0.1mM and 0.25mM). Subsequently, angiogenic differentiation was analyzed by qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA markers and in vitro spheroid sprouting assays.

RESULTS: DPSCs treated with 0.25mM TEGDMA revealed downregulation of angiogenesis-related marker genes PECAM1 (max. 3.8-fold), VEGF-A (max. 2.4-fold) and FLT1 (max. 2.9-fold) compared to respective untreated control. In addition, a reduction of the sprouting potential of DPSCs cultured in the presence of 0.25mM TEGDMA was detectable. Larger spheroidal structures were detectable in the untreated control in comparison to cells treated with 0.25mM TEGDMA. In contrast, TEGDMA at 0.1mM was not affecting angiogenic potential in the investigated time period (up to 28 days).

SIGNIFICANCE: The results of the present study show that TEGDMA concentration dependently impair the angiogenic differentiation potential of DPSCs and may affect wound healing and the formation of granulation tissue.

Keywords

    Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Dental Pulp, Polyethylene Glycols, Polymethacrylic Acids, Stem Cells, Dental pulp stem cells, Spheroid sprouting, TEGDMA, Angiogenic differentiation, Gene expression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Impaired angiogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells during exposure to the resinous monomer triethylene glycol dimethacrylate. / Schertl, Peter; Volk, Joachim; Perduns, Renke et al.
In: Dental Materials, Vol. 35, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 144-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Schertl P, Volk J, Perduns R, Adam K, Leyhausen G, Bakopoulou A et al. Impaired angiogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells during exposure to the resinous monomer triethylene glycol dimethacrylate. Dental Materials. 2019 Jan;35(1):144-155. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.006
Download
@article{fcc65be17ea643abb44a9d9524c4c5c8,
title = "Impaired angiogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells during exposure to the resinous monomer triethylene glycol dimethacrylate",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) can differentiate into tissue specific lineages to support dental pulp regeneration after injuries. Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) is a widely used co-monomer in restorative dentistry with adverse effects on cellular metabolism. Aim of this study was to analyze the impact of TEGDMA on the angiogenic differentiation potential of DPSCs.METHODS: DPSCs were characterized by flow cytometry. Short-term (max. 72h) cytotoxicity of TEGDMA was assessed by MTT assay. To evaluate TEGDMA effects on angiogenic differentiation, DPSCs were cultivated in angiogenic differentiation medium (ADM) in the presence or absence of short-term non-toxic TEGDMA concentrations (0.1mM and 0.25mM). Subsequently, angiogenic differentiation was analyzed by qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA markers and in vitro spheroid sprouting assays.RESULTS: DPSCs treated with 0.25mM TEGDMA revealed downregulation of angiogenesis-related marker genes PECAM1 (max. 3.8-fold), VEGF-A (max. 2.4-fold) and FLT1 (max. 2.9-fold) compared to respective untreated control. In addition, a reduction of the sprouting potential of DPSCs cultured in the presence of 0.25mM TEGDMA was detectable. Larger spheroidal structures were detectable in the untreated control in comparison to cells treated with 0.25mM TEGDMA. In contrast, TEGDMA at 0.1mM was not affecting angiogenic potential in the investigated time period (up to 28 days).SIGNIFICANCE: The results of the present study show that TEGDMA concentration dependently impair the angiogenic differentiation potential of DPSCs and may affect wound healing and the formation of granulation tissue.",
keywords = "Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Dental Pulp, Polyethylene Glycols, Polymethacrylic Acids, Stem Cells, Dental pulp stem cells, Spheroid sprouting, TEGDMA, Angiogenic differentiation, Gene expression",
author = "Peter Schertl and Joachim Volk and Renke Perduns and Knut Adam and Gabriele Leyhausen and Athina Bakopoulou and Werner Geurtsen",
note = "Funding information: We thank Ms. R. Bergin, Ms. S. Taubeler-Gerling and Ms. A. Beckedorf for their technical assistance. This study was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft/German National Science Foundation (DFG) (GE 455/17-1).",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.006",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "144--155",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impaired angiogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells during exposure to the resinous monomer triethylene glycol dimethacrylate

AU - Schertl, Peter

AU - Volk, Joachim

AU - Perduns, Renke

AU - Adam, Knut

AU - Leyhausen, Gabriele

AU - Bakopoulou, Athina

AU - Geurtsen, Werner

N1 - Funding information: We thank Ms. R. Bergin, Ms. S. Taubeler-Gerling and Ms. A. Beckedorf for their technical assistance. This study was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft/German National Science Foundation (DFG) (GE 455/17-1).

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) can differentiate into tissue specific lineages to support dental pulp regeneration after injuries. Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) is a widely used co-monomer in restorative dentistry with adverse effects on cellular metabolism. Aim of this study was to analyze the impact of TEGDMA on the angiogenic differentiation potential of DPSCs.METHODS: DPSCs were characterized by flow cytometry. Short-term (max. 72h) cytotoxicity of TEGDMA was assessed by MTT assay. To evaluate TEGDMA effects on angiogenic differentiation, DPSCs were cultivated in angiogenic differentiation medium (ADM) in the presence or absence of short-term non-toxic TEGDMA concentrations (0.1mM and 0.25mM). Subsequently, angiogenic differentiation was analyzed by qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA markers and in vitro spheroid sprouting assays.RESULTS: DPSCs treated with 0.25mM TEGDMA revealed downregulation of angiogenesis-related marker genes PECAM1 (max. 3.8-fold), VEGF-A (max. 2.4-fold) and FLT1 (max. 2.9-fold) compared to respective untreated control. In addition, a reduction of the sprouting potential of DPSCs cultured in the presence of 0.25mM TEGDMA was detectable. Larger spheroidal structures were detectable in the untreated control in comparison to cells treated with 0.25mM TEGDMA. In contrast, TEGDMA at 0.1mM was not affecting angiogenic potential in the investigated time period (up to 28 days).SIGNIFICANCE: The results of the present study show that TEGDMA concentration dependently impair the angiogenic differentiation potential of DPSCs and may affect wound healing and the formation of granulation tissue.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) can differentiate into tissue specific lineages to support dental pulp regeneration after injuries. Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) is a widely used co-monomer in restorative dentistry with adverse effects on cellular metabolism. Aim of this study was to analyze the impact of TEGDMA on the angiogenic differentiation potential of DPSCs.METHODS: DPSCs were characterized by flow cytometry. Short-term (max. 72h) cytotoxicity of TEGDMA was assessed by MTT assay. To evaluate TEGDMA effects on angiogenic differentiation, DPSCs were cultivated in angiogenic differentiation medium (ADM) in the presence or absence of short-term non-toxic TEGDMA concentrations (0.1mM and 0.25mM). Subsequently, angiogenic differentiation was analyzed by qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA markers and in vitro spheroid sprouting assays.RESULTS: DPSCs treated with 0.25mM TEGDMA revealed downregulation of angiogenesis-related marker genes PECAM1 (max. 3.8-fold), VEGF-A (max. 2.4-fold) and FLT1 (max. 2.9-fold) compared to respective untreated control. In addition, a reduction of the sprouting potential of DPSCs cultured in the presence of 0.25mM TEGDMA was detectable. Larger spheroidal structures were detectable in the untreated control in comparison to cells treated with 0.25mM TEGDMA. In contrast, TEGDMA at 0.1mM was not affecting angiogenic potential in the investigated time period (up to 28 days).SIGNIFICANCE: The results of the present study show that TEGDMA concentration dependently impair the angiogenic differentiation potential of DPSCs and may affect wound healing and the formation of granulation tissue.

KW - Cell Differentiation

KW - Cells, Cultured

KW - Dental Pulp

KW - Polyethylene Glycols

KW - Polymethacrylic Acids

KW - Stem Cells

KW - Dental pulp stem cells

KW - Spheroid sprouting

KW - TEGDMA

KW - Angiogenic differentiation

KW - Gene expression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057182104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 30502225

VL - 35

SP - 144

EP - 155

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 1

ER -

By the same author(s)