Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1828-1838 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Materials Research and Technology |
Volume | 20 |
Early online date | 10 Aug 2022 |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2022 |
Abstract
Due to the complex mechanisms, the ultrasonic (US) wire bonding process is usually optimized in the way of varying the processing parameters including normal force, US power, and processing time. In this study, a new way by creating different surface textures on substrates was used to alter the bonding process and improvements of the bonding process were detected. Three different surface textures including deposited strips, straight ditches at different angles, and elliptic ditches were designed and created on glass substrates. The results showed that the elliptic ditches hardly influence the bonding process while the deposited strips and straight ditches significantly alter the bonding process. The deposited strips help break the oxide scale and facilitate the transportation of oxides to the outside of contact. With the straight ditches, the oxide removal efficiency was significantly enhanced. Especially when the driving current exceeded 0.45 A, long chips from the ditches were clearly observed during the bonding process. The chips were aluminum and aluminum oxide which were continuously cut from the wire, accumulated in the ditches, pressed and squeezed to the outside of the contact. With a different angle of the straight ditches, the shape of the bonding footprint can be changed correspondingly. Compared to the bonding on smooth surfaces, the bonding strength on substrates with deposited strips and straight ditches was a few times higher and had a smaller deviation. The bonding process window was significantly enlarged.
Keywords
- Bonding mechanisms, Microweld formation, Oxide removal, Process window, Surface texture, Ultrasonic wire bonding
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Materials Science(all)
- Ceramics and Composites
- Materials Science(all)
- Metals and Alloys
- Materials Science(all)
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films
- Materials Science(all)
- Biomaterials
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 20, 09.2022, p. 1828-1838.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of surface texture on ultrasonic wire bonding process
AU - Long, Yangyang
AU - Arndt, Matthias
AU - Dencker, Folke
AU - Wurz, Marc
AU - Twiefel, Jens
AU - Wallaschek, Jörg
N1 - Funding Information: We gratefully acknowledge the support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation ) with the project number 329797820. The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Publishing Fund of Leibniz Universität Hannover.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Due to the complex mechanisms, the ultrasonic (US) wire bonding process is usually optimized in the way of varying the processing parameters including normal force, US power, and processing time. In this study, a new way by creating different surface textures on substrates was used to alter the bonding process and improvements of the bonding process were detected. Three different surface textures including deposited strips, straight ditches at different angles, and elliptic ditches were designed and created on glass substrates. The results showed that the elliptic ditches hardly influence the bonding process while the deposited strips and straight ditches significantly alter the bonding process. The deposited strips help break the oxide scale and facilitate the transportation of oxides to the outside of contact. With the straight ditches, the oxide removal efficiency was significantly enhanced. Especially when the driving current exceeded 0.45 A, long chips from the ditches were clearly observed during the bonding process. The chips were aluminum and aluminum oxide which were continuously cut from the wire, accumulated in the ditches, pressed and squeezed to the outside of the contact. With a different angle of the straight ditches, the shape of the bonding footprint can be changed correspondingly. Compared to the bonding on smooth surfaces, the bonding strength on substrates with deposited strips and straight ditches was a few times higher and had a smaller deviation. The bonding process window was significantly enlarged.
AB - Due to the complex mechanisms, the ultrasonic (US) wire bonding process is usually optimized in the way of varying the processing parameters including normal force, US power, and processing time. In this study, a new way by creating different surface textures on substrates was used to alter the bonding process and improvements of the bonding process were detected. Three different surface textures including deposited strips, straight ditches at different angles, and elliptic ditches were designed and created on glass substrates. The results showed that the elliptic ditches hardly influence the bonding process while the deposited strips and straight ditches significantly alter the bonding process. The deposited strips help break the oxide scale and facilitate the transportation of oxides to the outside of contact. With the straight ditches, the oxide removal efficiency was significantly enhanced. Especially when the driving current exceeded 0.45 A, long chips from the ditches were clearly observed during the bonding process. The chips were aluminum and aluminum oxide which were continuously cut from the wire, accumulated in the ditches, pressed and squeezed to the outside of the contact. With a different angle of the straight ditches, the shape of the bonding footprint can be changed correspondingly. Compared to the bonding on smooth surfaces, the bonding strength on substrates with deposited strips and straight ditches was a few times higher and had a smaller deviation. The bonding process window was significantly enlarged.
KW - Bonding mechanisms
KW - Microweld formation
KW - Oxide removal
KW - Process window
KW - Surface texture
KW - Ultrasonic wire bonding
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145583921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.187
DO - 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.187
M3 - Article
VL - 20
SP - 1828
EP - 1838
JO - Journal of Materials Research and Technology
JF - Journal of Materials Research and Technology
SN - 2238-7854
ER -