Impact of contacting geometries on measured fill factors

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Christian N. Kruse
  • Martin Wolf
  • Carsten Schinke
  • David Hinken
  • Rolf Brendel
  • Karsten Bothe

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Institute for Solar Energy Research (ISFH)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-90
Number of pages7
JournalEnergy Procedia
Volume124
Publication statusPublished - 21 Sept 2017
Event7th International Conference on Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2017 - Freiburg, Germany
Duration: 3 Apr 20175 Apr 2017

Abstract

The fill factor determined from a measured current-voltage characteristic of a bare solar cell depends on the number and positions of the electrical contacting probes. Nine different geometries for contacting the front side busbars are used to measure the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of a 5 busbar industrial-type passivated emitter and rear totally diffused (PERT) solar cell under standard testing conditions. The fill factors of the measured I-V characteristics vary from 78.5 %abs to 80.6 %abs. We further measure the contacting resistance of 3 different contacting probes to estimate the sensitivity of measurements with different contacting geometries on random resistance variations. The contacting resistance is 60 mΩ for nine-point probes and 80 mΩ for four- and single-point probes. We determine the magnitude of contacting resistance variations from measurements at different probe positions to be ±30 mΩ. Using this variation, we perform numerical simulations and find a larger sensitivity on random resistance variations for tandem- (pairs of current- and sense probes) compared to triplet (one sense- between two current probes) configurations. The corresponding fill factor deviation is approximately 0.1%abs for tandem configurations when the contacting resistances of up to two current probes are altered. The sensitivity for triplet configurations is negligible.

Keywords

    Characterization of PV, Current-voltage characteristics, Fill Factor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Impact of contacting geometries on measured fill factors. / Kruse, Christian N.; Wolf, Martin; Schinke, Carsten et al.
In: Energy Procedia, Vol. 124, 21.09.2017, p. 84-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer review

Kruse, CN, Wolf, M, Schinke, C, Hinken, D, Brendel, R & Bothe, K 2017, 'Impact of contacting geometries on measured fill factors', Energy Procedia, vol. 124, pp. 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.329
Kruse, C. N., Wolf, M., Schinke, C., Hinken, D., Brendel, R., & Bothe, K. (2017). Impact of contacting geometries on measured fill factors. Energy Procedia, 124, 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.329
Kruse CN, Wolf M, Schinke C, Hinken D, Brendel R, Bothe K. Impact of contacting geometries on measured fill factors. Energy Procedia. 2017 Sept 21;124:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.329
Kruse, Christian N. ; Wolf, Martin ; Schinke, Carsten et al. / Impact of contacting geometries on measured fill factors. In: Energy Procedia. 2017 ; Vol. 124. pp. 84-90.
Download
@article{4b574959cf614a7580cd95989902d293,
title = "Impact of contacting geometries on measured fill factors",
abstract = "The fill factor determined from a measured current-voltage characteristic of a bare solar cell depends on the number and positions of the electrical contacting probes. Nine different geometries for contacting the front side busbars are used to measure the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of a 5 busbar industrial-type passivated emitter and rear totally diffused (PERT) solar cell under standard testing conditions. The fill factors of the measured I-V characteristics vary from 78.5 %abs to 80.6 %abs. We further measure the contacting resistance of 3 different contacting probes to estimate the sensitivity of measurements with different contacting geometries on random resistance variations. The contacting resistance is 60 mΩ for nine-point probes and 80 mΩ for four- and single-point probes. We determine the magnitude of contacting resistance variations from measurements at different probe positions to be ±30 mΩ. Using this variation, we perform numerical simulations and find a larger sensitivity on random resistance variations for tandem- (pairs of current- and sense probes) compared to triplet (one sense- between two current probes) configurations. The corresponding fill factor deviation is approximately 0.1%abs for tandem configurations when the contacting resistances of up to two current probes are altered. The sensitivity for triplet configurations is negligible.",
keywords = "Characterization of PV, Current-voltage characteristics, Fill Factor",
author = "Kruse, {Christian N.} and Martin Wolf and Carsten Schinke and David Hinken and Rolf Brendel and Karsten Bothe",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.; 7th International Conference on Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2017 ; Conference date: 03-04-2017 Through 05-04-2017",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.329",
language = "English",
volume = "124",
pages = "84--90",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of contacting geometries on measured fill factors

AU - Kruse, Christian N.

AU - Wolf, Martin

AU - Schinke, Carsten

AU - Hinken, David

AU - Brendel, Rolf

AU - Bothe, Karsten

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/9/21

Y1 - 2017/9/21

N2 - The fill factor determined from a measured current-voltage characteristic of a bare solar cell depends on the number and positions of the electrical contacting probes. Nine different geometries for contacting the front side busbars are used to measure the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of a 5 busbar industrial-type passivated emitter and rear totally diffused (PERT) solar cell under standard testing conditions. The fill factors of the measured I-V characteristics vary from 78.5 %abs to 80.6 %abs. We further measure the contacting resistance of 3 different contacting probes to estimate the sensitivity of measurements with different contacting geometries on random resistance variations. The contacting resistance is 60 mΩ for nine-point probes and 80 mΩ for four- and single-point probes. We determine the magnitude of contacting resistance variations from measurements at different probe positions to be ±30 mΩ. Using this variation, we perform numerical simulations and find a larger sensitivity on random resistance variations for tandem- (pairs of current- and sense probes) compared to triplet (one sense- between two current probes) configurations. The corresponding fill factor deviation is approximately 0.1%abs for tandem configurations when the contacting resistances of up to two current probes are altered. The sensitivity for triplet configurations is negligible.

AB - The fill factor determined from a measured current-voltage characteristic of a bare solar cell depends on the number and positions of the electrical contacting probes. Nine different geometries for contacting the front side busbars are used to measure the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of a 5 busbar industrial-type passivated emitter and rear totally diffused (PERT) solar cell under standard testing conditions. The fill factors of the measured I-V characteristics vary from 78.5 %abs to 80.6 %abs. We further measure the contacting resistance of 3 different contacting probes to estimate the sensitivity of measurements with different contacting geometries on random resistance variations. The contacting resistance is 60 mΩ for nine-point probes and 80 mΩ for four- and single-point probes. We determine the magnitude of contacting resistance variations from measurements at different probe positions to be ±30 mΩ. Using this variation, we perform numerical simulations and find a larger sensitivity on random resistance variations for tandem- (pairs of current- and sense probes) compared to triplet (one sense- between two current probes) configurations. The corresponding fill factor deviation is approximately 0.1%abs for tandem configurations when the contacting resistances of up to two current probes are altered. The sensitivity for triplet configurations is negligible.

KW - Characterization of PV

KW - Current-voltage characteristics

KW - Fill Factor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031924755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.329

DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.329

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85031924755

VL - 124

SP - 84

EP - 90

JO - Energy Procedia

JF - Energy Procedia

SN - 1876-6102

T2 - 7th International Conference on Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2017

Y2 - 3 April 2017 through 5 April 2017

ER -