Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Achim Gathmann
  • Ludger Wirooks
  • Ludwig A. Hothorn
  • Detlef Bartsch
  • Ingolf Schuphan

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • RWTH Aachen University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2677-2685
Number of pages9
JournalMolecular ecology
Volume15
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jun 2006

Abstract

Environmental risks of Bt maize, particularly pollen drift from Bt maize, were assessed for nontarget lepidopteran larvae in maize field margins. In our experimental approach, we carried out 3-year field trials on 6 ha total. Three treatments were used in a randomized block design with eight replications resulting in 24 plots: (i) near-isogenic control variety without insecticide (control), (ii) near-isogenic control variety with chemical insecticide (Baytroid) and (iii) Bt maize expressing the recombinant toxin. We established a weed strip (20 x 1 m) in every plot consisting of a Chenopodium album (goosefoot)/Sinapis alba (mustard) mixture. In these strips we measured diversity and abundance of lepidopteran larvae during maize bloom and pollen shed. C. album hosted five species but all in very low densities; therefore data were not suitable for statistical analysis. S. alba hosted nine species in total. Most abundant were Plutella xylostella and Pieris rapae. For these species no differences were detected between the Bt treatment and the control, but the chemical insecticide treatment reduced larval abundance significantly. Conclusions regarding experimental methodology and results are discussed in regard to environmental risk assessment and monitoring of genetically modified organisms.

Keywords

    Bt maize, Insecticide, Lepidoptera, Monitoring, Nontarget effects, Risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds. / Gathmann, Achim; Wirooks, Ludger; Hothorn, Ludwig A. et al.
In: Molecular ecology, Vol. 15, No. 9, 07.06.2006, p. 2677-2685.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Gathmann, A, Wirooks, L, Hothorn, LA, Bartsch, D & Schuphan, I 2006, 'Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds', Molecular ecology, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 2677-2685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02962.x
Gathmann, A., Wirooks, L., Hothorn, L. A., Bartsch, D., & Schuphan, I. (2006). Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds. Molecular ecology, 15(9), 2677-2685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02962.x
Gathmann A, Wirooks L, Hothorn LA, Bartsch D, Schuphan I. Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds. Molecular ecology. 2006 Jun 7;15(9):2677-2685. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02962.x
Gathmann, Achim ; Wirooks, Ludger ; Hothorn, Ludwig A. et al. / Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds. In: Molecular ecology. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 9. pp. 2677-2685.
Download
@article{d3a434fa32534373a064bc23648b5872,
title = "Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds",
abstract = "Environmental risks of Bt maize, particularly pollen drift from Bt maize, were assessed for nontarget lepidopteran larvae in maize field margins. In our experimental approach, we carried out 3-year field trials on 6 ha total. Three treatments were used in a randomized block design with eight replications resulting in 24 plots: (i) near-isogenic control variety without insecticide (control), (ii) near-isogenic control variety with chemical insecticide (Baytroid) and (iii) Bt maize expressing the recombinant toxin. We established a weed strip (20 x 1 m) in every plot consisting of a Chenopodium album (goosefoot)/Sinapis alba (mustard) mixture. In these strips we measured diversity and abundance of lepidopteran larvae during maize bloom and pollen shed. C. album hosted five species but all in very low densities; therefore data were not suitable for statistical analysis. S. alba hosted nine species in total. Most abundant were Plutella xylostella and Pieris rapae. For these species no differences were detected between the Bt treatment and the control, but the chemical insecticide treatment reduced larval abundance significantly. Conclusions regarding experimental methodology and results are discussed in regard to environmental risk assessment and monitoring of genetically modified organisms.",
keywords = "Bt maize, Insecticide, Lepidoptera, Monitoring, Nontarget effects, Risk assessment",
author = "Achim Gathmann and Ludger Wirooks and Hothorn, {Ludwig A.} and Detlef Bartsch and Ingolf Schuphan",
year = "2006",
month = jun,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02962.x",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "2677--2685",
journal = "Molecular ecology",
issn = "0962-1083",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "9",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds

AU - Gathmann, Achim

AU - Wirooks, Ludger

AU - Hothorn, Ludwig A.

AU - Bartsch, Detlef

AU - Schuphan, Ingolf

PY - 2006/6/7

Y1 - 2006/6/7

N2 - Environmental risks of Bt maize, particularly pollen drift from Bt maize, were assessed for nontarget lepidopteran larvae in maize field margins. In our experimental approach, we carried out 3-year field trials on 6 ha total. Three treatments were used in a randomized block design with eight replications resulting in 24 plots: (i) near-isogenic control variety without insecticide (control), (ii) near-isogenic control variety with chemical insecticide (Baytroid) and (iii) Bt maize expressing the recombinant toxin. We established a weed strip (20 x 1 m) in every plot consisting of a Chenopodium album (goosefoot)/Sinapis alba (mustard) mixture. In these strips we measured diversity and abundance of lepidopteran larvae during maize bloom and pollen shed. C. album hosted five species but all in very low densities; therefore data were not suitable for statistical analysis. S. alba hosted nine species in total. Most abundant were Plutella xylostella and Pieris rapae. For these species no differences were detected between the Bt treatment and the control, but the chemical insecticide treatment reduced larval abundance significantly. Conclusions regarding experimental methodology and results are discussed in regard to environmental risk assessment and monitoring of genetically modified organisms.

AB - Environmental risks of Bt maize, particularly pollen drift from Bt maize, were assessed for nontarget lepidopteran larvae in maize field margins. In our experimental approach, we carried out 3-year field trials on 6 ha total. Three treatments were used in a randomized block design with eight replications resulting in 24 plots: (i) near-isogenic control variety without insecticide (control), (ii) near-isogenic control variety with chemical insecticide (Baytroid) and (iii) Bt maize expressing the recombinant toxin. We established a weed strip (20 x 1 m) in every plot consisting of a Chenopodium album (goosefoot)/Sinapis alba (mustard) mixture. In these strips we measured diversity and abundance of lepidopteran larvae during maize bloom and pollen shed. C. album hosted five species but all in very low densities; therefore data were not suitable for statistical analysis. S. alba hosted nine species in total. Most abundant were Plutella xylostella and Pieris rapae. For these species no differences were detected between the Bt treatment and the control, but the chemical insecticide treatment reduced larval abundance significantly. Conclusions regarding experimental methodology and results are discussed in regard to environmental risk assessment and monitoring of genetically modified organisms.

KW - Bt maize

KW - Insecticide

KW - Lepidoptera

KW - Monitoring

KW - Nontarget effects

KW - Risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745882665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02962.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02962.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16842436

AN - SCOPUS:33745882665

VL - 15

SP - 2677

EP - 2685

JO - Molecular ecology

JF - Molecular ecology

SN - 0962-1083

IS - 9

ER -