Immigration and the modern welfare state: The case of USA and Germany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Chemnitz University of Technology (CUT)
  • Heidelberg University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)537-548
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Volume23
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Increasing migration has led to extensive discussion of the definition of membership within a nation-state. This article presents a comparison of the inclusion of migrants into welfare programmes in the USA and in Germany. In the first part of the article a brief overview is provided of immigration categories in both countries in order to demonstrate the relevance of these administrative regulations for the opportunities of individual migrants to participate in the welfare system. In the second part we elaborate in more detail on how welfare programmes have developed as basic mechanisms to include or exclude migrants. Our findings illustrate an increasing differentiation of membership statuses parallel to the expansion of modern welfare systems. In both the USA and Germany, the territorial principle and participation in the labour market are of prime importance to the access to social rights. In both cases all migrants may profit from contributory programmes.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Immigration and the modern welfare state: The case of USA and Germany. / Wenzel, Uwe; Bös, Mathias.
In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1997, p. 537-548.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{92c65a266f7e4079a7d47ded75a72482,
title = "Immigration and the modern welfare state: The case of USA and Germany",
abstract = "Increasing migration has led to extensive discussion of the definition of membership within a nation-state. This article presents a comparison of the inclusion of migrants into welfare programmes in the USA and in Germany. In the first part of the article a brief overview is provided of immigration categories in both countries in order to demonstrate the relevance of these administrative regulations for the opportunities of individual migrants to participate in the welfare system. In the second part we elaborate in more detail on how welfare programmes have developed as basic mechanisms to include or exclude migrants. Our findings illustrate an increasing differentiation of membership statuses parallel to the expansion of modern welfare systems. In both the USA and Germany, the territorial principle and participation in the labour market are of prime importance to the access to social rights. In both cases all migrants may profit from contributory programmes.",
author = "Uwe Wenzel and Mathias B{\"o}s",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1080/1369183X.1997.9976610",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "537--548",
journal = "Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies",
issn = "1369-183X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immigration and the modern welfare state

T2 - The case of USA and Germany

AU - Wenzel, Uwe

AU - Bös, Mathias

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Increasing migration has led to extensive discussion of the definition of membership within a nation-state. This article presents a comparison of the inclusion of migrants into welfare programmes in the USA and in Germany. In the first part of the article a brief overview is provided of immigration categories in both countries in order to demonstrate the relevance of these administrative regulations for the opportunities of individual migrants to participate in the welfare system. In the second part we elaborate in more detail on how welfare programmes have developed as basic mechanisms to include or exclude migrants. Our findings illustrate an increasing differentiation of membership statuses parallel to the expansion of modern welfare systems. In both the USA and Germany, the territorial principle and participation in the labour market are of prime importance to the access to social rights. In both cases all migrants may profit from contributory programmes.

AB - Increasing migration has led to extensive discussion of the definition of membership within a nation-state. This article presents a comparison of the inclusion of migrants into welfare programmes in the USA and in Germany. In the first part of the article a brief overview is provided of immigration categories in both countries in order to demonstrate the relevance of these administrative regulations for the opportunities of individual migrants to participate in the welfare system. In the second part we elaborate in more detail on how welfare programmes have developed as basic mechanisms to include or exclude migrants. Our findings illustrate an increasing differentiation of membership statuses parallel to the expansion of modern welfare systems. In both the USA and Germany, the territorial principle and participation in the labour market are of prime importance to the access to social rights. In both cases all migrants may profit from contributory programmes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031282869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1369183X.1997.9976610

DO - 10.1080/1369183X.1997.9976610

M3 - Article

C2 - 12179827

AN - SCOPUS:0031282869

VL - 23

SP - 537

EP - 548

JO - Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

JF - Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

SN - 1369-183X

IS - 4

ER -

By the same author(s)