Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 307-322 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | International Journal for Philosophy of Religion |
Volume | 95 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 22 Dec 2023 |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2024 |
Abstract
Suppose Molinism is true and God placed Adam in the garden because God knew Adam would freely eat of the fruit. Suppose further that, had it not been true that Adam would freely eat of the fruit, were he placed in the garden, God would have placed someone else there instead. When Adam freely eats of the fruit, is he free to do otherwise? This paper argues that there is a strong case for both a positive and a negative answer.
Keywords
- Counterfactual power, Freedom, Middle knowledge theory, Molinism, Self-defeating actions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Arts and Humanities(all)
- Philosophy
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 95, No. 3, 06.2024, p. 307-322.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - If Molinism is true, what can you do?
AU - Law, Andrew
N1 - Funding Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Suppose Molinism is true and God placed Adam in the garden because God knew Adam would freely eat of the fruit. Suppose further that, had it not been true that Adam would freely eat of the fruit, were he placed in the garden, God would have placed someone else there instead. When Adam freely eats of the fruit, is he free to do otherwise? This paper argues that there is a strong case for both a positive and a negative answer.
AB - Suppose Molinism is true and God placed Adam in the garden because God knew Adam would freely eat of the fruit. Suppose further that, had it not been true that Adam would freely eat of the fruit, were he placed in the garden, God would have placed someone else there instead. When Adam freely eats of the fruit, is he free to do otherwise? This paper argues that there is a strong case for both a positive and a negative answer.
KW - Counterfactual power
KW - Freedom
KW - Middle knowledge theory
KW - Molinism
KW - Self-defeating actions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180211012&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11153-023-09901-1
DO - 10.1007/s11153-023-09901-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85180211012
VL - 95
SP - 307
EP - 322
JO - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
JF - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
SN - 0020-7047
IS - 3
ER -