Details
| Original language | German |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
| Event | Jicable'19: 10th International Conference on Insulated Power Cables - Versailles, France Duration: 23 Jun 2019 → 27 Jun 2019 |
Conference
| Conference | Jicable'19 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | France |
| Period | 23 Jun 2019 → 27 Jun 2019 |
Abstract
of a cable caused by damages or aging. Those changes might be very small or far from the position of the measurement devices and reach the physical limitation of applicability of these methods. In this paper measurements and simulation results are presented, which evaluate the limitations of both methods in identifying of deviations in cable properties, detectable fault impedances, and measurable cable lengths. Moreover, this contribution gives a theoretical and practical comparison of FDA and TDR method.
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
2019. Paper presented at Jicable'19, France.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research
}
TY - CONF
T1 - HV Cable Diagnostic by Time Domain Reflectometry or Frequency Domain Analysis?
T2 - Jicable'19
AU - Werle, Peter
AU - Norouzi, Younes
AU - Frohne, Christian
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Frequency domain analysis (FDA) and Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) are two cable fault localization methods. FDA and TDR employ changes in the impedanceof a cable caused by damages or aging. Those changes might be very small or far from the position of the measurement devices and reach the physical limitation of applicability of these methods. In this paper measurements and simulation results are presented, which evaluate the limitations of both methods in identifying of deviations in cable properties, detectable fault impedances, and measurable cable lengths. Moreover, this contribution gives a theoretical and practical comparison of FDA and TDR method.
AB - Frequency domain analysis (FDA) and Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) are two cable fault localization methods. FDA and TDR employ changes in the impedanceof a cable caused by damages or aging. Those changes might be very small or far from the position of the measurement devices and reach the physical limitation of applicability of these methods. In this paper measurements and simulation results are presented, which evaluate the limitations of both methods in identifying of deviations in cable properties, detectable fault impedances, and measurable cable lengths. Moreover, this contribution gives a theoretical and practical comparison of FDA and TDR method.
M3 - Paper
Y2 - 23 June 2019 through 27 June 2019
ER -