How to best promote my product? Comparing the effectiveness of sensory, functional and symbolic advertising content in food marketing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Janina Haase
  • Klaus Peter Wiedmann
  • Jannick Bettels
  • Franziska Labenz
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1792-1806
Number of pages15
JournalBritish food journal
Volume120
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 7 Aug 2018

Abstract

Purpose: Advertising is one of the most important components of food marketing. However, there is uncertainty over the optimal means of convincing consumers to buy a product. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of advertising content comprising text (sensory, functional and symbolic messages) and pictures (product image) on food product evaluation. Design/methodology/approach: Two online experiments investigating strawberry advertisements were performed. Study 1 incorporated only text, whereas study 2 investigated combinations of text and pictures. Analyses of variance were conducted to determine any significant differences among the three texts (sensory, functional and symbolic) and among the combinations of text and pictures. Findings: Study 1 revealed no significant differences. All three texts were well received, which shows the relevance of all the product benefits – sensory, functional and symbolic – for food products. In contrast, study 2 identified significant differences. The data analysis indicated that advertising effectiveness increases with the complementarity of the text and picture. Notably, the combination of the product picture and symbolic text was scored the highest for effectiveness. Originality/value: The findings provide new insights into advertising design that food firms can use to enhance consumer product evaluations in terms of expected taste, perceived experience and quality, overall attitude and purchase intention. Further, the results contribute to the research stream of food product benefits by highlighting the relevance of sensory, functional and symbolic design elements.

Keywords

    Advertising design, Advertising effectiveness, Food marketing, Food products, Product design, Product evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

How to best promote my product? Comparing the effectiveness of sensory, functional and symbolic advertising content in food marketing. / Haase, Janina; Wiedmann, Klaus Peter; Bettels, Jannick et al.
In: British food journal, Vol. 120, No. 8, 07.08.2018, p. 1792-1806.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Haase J, Wiedmann KP, Bettels J, Labenz F. How to best promote my product? Comparing the effectiveness of sensory, functional and symbolic advertising content in food marketing. British food journal. 2018 Aug 7;120(8):1792-1806. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0058
Haase, Janina ; Wiedmann, Klaus Peter ; Bettels, Jannick et al. / How to best promote my product? Comparing the effectiveness of sensory, functional and symbolic advertising content in food marketing. In: British food journal. 2018 ; Vol. 120, No. 8. pp. 1792-1806.
Download
@article{13d5f06d6cb24ad9917acd601507dfa3,
title = "How to best promote my product? Comparing the effectiveness of sensory, functional and symbolic advertising content in food marketing",
abstract = "Purpose: Advertising is one of the most important components of food marketing. However, there is uncertainty over the optimal means of convincing consumers to buy a product. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of advertising content comprising text (sensory, functional and symbolic messages) and pictures (product image) on food product evaluation. Design/methodology/approach: Two online experiments investigating strawberry advertisements were performed. Study 1 incorporated only text, whereas study 2 investigated combinations of text and pictures. Analyses of variance were conducted to determine any significant differences among the three texts (sensory, functional and symbolic) and among the combinations of text and pictures. Findings: Study 1 revealed no significant differences. All three texts were well received, which shows the relevance of all the product benefits – sensory, functional and symbolic – for food products. In contrast, study 2 identified significant differences. The data analysis indicated that advertising effectiveness increases with the complementarity of the text and picture. Notably, the combination of the product picture and symbolic text was scored the highest for effectiveness. Originality/value: The findings provide new insights into advertising design that food firms can use to enhance consumer product evaluations in terms of expected taste, perceived experience and quality, overall attitude and purchase intention. Further, the results contribute to the research stream of food product benefits by highlighting the relevance of sensory, functional and symbolic design elements.",
keywords = "Advertising design, Advertising effectiveness, Food marketing, Food products, Product design, Product evaluation",
author = "Janina Haase and Wiedmann, {Klaus Peter} and Jannick Bettels and Franziska Labenz",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = aug,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0058",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "1792--1806",
journal = "British food journal",
issn = "0007-070X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to best promote my product? Comparing the effectiveness of sensory, functional and symbolic advertising content in food marketing

AU - Haase, Janina

AU - Wiedmann, Klaus Peter

AU - Bettels, Jannick

AU - Labenz, Franziska

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/8/7

Y1 - 2018/8/7

N2 - Purpose: Advertising is one of the most important components of food marketing. However, there is uncertainty over the optimal means of convincing consumers to buy a product. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of advertising content comprising text (sensory, functional and symbolic messages) and pictures (product image) on food product evaluation. Design/methodology/approach: Two online experiments investigating strawberry advertisements were performed. Study 1 incorporated only text, whereas study 2 investigated combinations of text and pictures. Analyses of variance were conducted to determine any significant differences among the three texts (sensory, functional and symbolic) and among the combinations of text and pictures. Findings: Study 1 revealed no significant differences. All three texts were well received, which shows the relevance of all the product benefits – sensory, functional and symbolic – for food products. In contrast, study 2 identified significant differences. The data analysis indicated that advertising effectiveness increases with the complementarity of the text and picture. Notably, the combination of the product picture and symbolic text was scored the highest for effectiveness. Originality/value: The findings provide new insights into advertising design that food firms can use to enhance consumer product evaluations in terms of expected taste, perceived experience and quality, overall attitude and purchase intention. Further, the results contribute to the research stream of food product benefits by highlighting the relevance of sensory, functional and symbolic design elements.

AB - Purpose: Advertising is one of the most important components of food marketing. However, there is uncertainty over the optimal means of convincing consumers to buy a product. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of advertising content comprising text (sensory, functional and symbolic messages) and pictures (product image) on food product evaluation. Design/methodology/approach: Two online experiments investigating strawberry advertisements were performed. Study 1 incorporated only text, whereas study 2 investigated combinations of text and pictures. Analyses of variance were conducted to determine any significant differences among the three texts (sensory, functional and symbolic) and among the combinations of text and pictures. Findings: Study 1 revealed no significant differences. All three texts were well received, which shows the relevance of all the product benefits – sensory, functional and symbolic – for food products. In contrast, study 2 identified significant differences. The data analysis indicated that advertising effectiveness increases with the complementarity of the text and picture. Notably, the combination of the product picture and symbolic text was scored the highest for effectiveness. Originality/value: The findings provide new insights into advertising design that food firms can use to enhance consumer product evaluations in terms of expected taste, perceived experience and quality, overall attitude and purchase intention. Further, the results contribute to the research stream of food product benefits by highlighting the relevance of sensory, functional and symbolic design elements.

KW - Advertising design

KW - Advertising effectiveness

KW - Food marketing

KW - Food products

KW - Product design

KW - Product evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052074653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0058

DO - 10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0058

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052074653

VL - 120

SP - 1792

EP - 1806

JO - British food journal

JF - British food journal

SN - 0007-070X

IS - 8

ER -