Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Optimistic Marketing in Challenging Times |
| Subtitle of host publication | Serving Ever-Shifting Customer Needs, Proceedings of the 2022 AMS Annual Conference |
| Place of Publication | Cham |
| Publisher | Springer Nature |
| Pages | 291-292 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| ISBN (electronic) | 978-3-031-24687-6 |
| ISBN (print) | 978-3-031-24686-9 |
| Publication status | Published - 14 Mar 2023 |
| Event | 2022 AMS Annual Conference - Monterey, United States Duration: 25 May 2022 → 27 May 2022 |
Publication series
| Name | Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science |
|---|---|
| ISSN (Print) | 2363-6165 |
| ISSN (electronic) | 2363-6173 |
Abstract
In light of the growing trend of influencer marketing, ample research has been conducted on its success factors (Lin et al., 2018). However, one success factor has rarely been considered: Influencers’ moral integrity, i.e., the absence of scandals. This is all the more surprising because the absence of scandals has been identified as the first and most important requirement for the success of any celebrity – above other much more frequently discussed requirements such as attractiveness, expertise or trustworthiness (Amos et al., 2015). As influencers’ main field of activity is the Internet, a major scandal may become a worldwide event in a matter of hours (Piazza & Jourdan, 2018). In addition, a scandal caused by an influencer is likely to become dangerous for an endorsed brand, which will be considered “guilty by association” (Appel et al., 2020; Kintu & Ben-Slimane, 2020). In the course of this work, we focus on five Hate Speech & Bad Language Scandals. These are: (1) Common use of Swearwords, (2) Gossiping, (3) Insulting followers, (4) Extremism and (5) Racist Slurs. Thereby we analyze the (a) perceived immorality and effects on (b) trust in the influencer, (c) liking of the influencer, (d) following the influencer and (e) purchase intention of the endorsed brand. We pose the following questions: Which scandals have the worst impacts on the influencer and brand? Are there some (minor) scandals that are not hazardous or may even be positive? To answer these questions, we examine and rank the effects of scandals on the influencer and endorsed brands through a survey employing 429 data sets analyzed by variance and cluster analyses in SPSS. In this way, we hierarchize influencer scandals. Some of the results are surprising. For example, even relatively small transgressions, such as the use of swearwords, can have detrimental effects on both the influencer and the brand – nevertheless it is the most minor scandal. Gossiping and insulting followers is of medium seriousness. The most serious scandals are extremism and racist slurs. Overall, a racist slur appears to be the most serious scandal, followed by extremism (except for the variable immorality, where insulting followers is the second worst). Finally, it should be noted that the impacts of the scandals on the five dependent variables were all similar, with differences in details only. At best, the small differences between immorality and the four other dependent variables are noteworthy. For example, immorality is the only variable for which gossiping does not differ significantly from extremism.
Keywords
- Hate speech, Language, Scandal, Social influencer marketing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business, Management and Accounting(all)
- Strategy and Management
- Business, Management and Accounting(all)
- Marketing
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
Optimistic Marketing in Challenging Times: Serving Ever-Shifting Customer Needs, Proceedings of the 2022 AMS Annual Conference. Cham: Springer Nature, 2023. p. 291-292 (Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science).
Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Conference abstract › Research › peer review
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Hate Speech and Bad Language
T2 - 2022 AMS Annual Conference
AU - von Mettenheim, Walter
AU - Wiedmann, Klaus Peter
PY - 2023/3/14
Y1 - 2023/3/14
N2 - In light of the growing trend of influencer marketing, ample research has been conducted on its success factors (Lin et al., 2018). However, one success factor has rarely been considered: Influencers’ moral integrity, i.e., the absence of scandals. This is all the more surprising because the absence of scandals has been identified as the first and most important requirement for the success of any celebrity – above other much more frequently discussed requirements such as attractiveness, expertise or trustworthiness (Amos et al., 2015). As influencers’ main field of activity is the Internet, a major scandal may become a worldwide event in a matter of hours (Piazza & Jourdan, 2018). In addition, a scandal caused by an influencer is likely to become dangerous for an endorsed brand, which will be considered “guilty by association” (Appel et al., 2020; Kintu & Ben-Slimane, 2020). In the course of this work, we focus on five Hate Speech & Bad Language Scandals. These are: (1) Common use of Swearwords, (2) Gossiping, (3) Insulting followers, (4) Extremism and (5) Racist Slurs. Thereby we analyze the (a) perceived immorality and effects on (b) trust in the influencer, (c) liking of the influencer, (d) following the influencer and (e) purchase intention of the endorsed brand. We pose the following questions: Which scandals have the worst impacts on the influencer and brand? Are there some (minor) scandals that are not hazardous or may even be positive? To answer these questions, we examine and rank the effects of scandals on the influencer and endorsed brands through a survey employing 429 data sets analyzed by variance and cluster analyses in SPSS. In this way, we hierarchize influencer scandals. Some of the results are surprising. For example, even relatively small transgressions, such as the use of swearwords, can have detrimental effects on both the influencer and the brand – nevertheless it is the most minor scandal. Gossiping and insulting followers is of medium seriousness. The most serious scandals are extremism and racist slurs. Overall, a racist slur appears to be the most serious scandal, followed by extremism (except for the variable immorality, where insulting followers is the second worst). Finally, it should be noted that the impacts of the scandals on the five dependent variables were all similar, with differences in details only. At best, the small differences between immorality and the four other dependent variables are noteworthy. For example, immorality is the only variable for which gossiping does not differ significantly from extremism.
AB - In light of the growing trend of influencer marketing, ample research has been conducted on its success factors (Lin et al., 2018). However, one success factor has rarely been considered: Influencers’ moral integrity, i.e., the absence of scandals. This is all the more surprising because the absence of scandals has been identified as the first and most important requirement for the success of any celebrity – above other much more frequently discussed requirements such as attractiveness, expertise or trustworthiness (Amos et al., 2015). As influencers’ main field of activity is the Internet, a major scandal may become a worldwide event in a matter of hours (Piazza & Jourdan, 2018). In addition, a scandal caused by an influencer is likely to become dangerous for an endorsed brand, which will be considered “guilty by association” (Appel et al., 2020; Kintu & Ben-Slimane, 2020). In the course of this work, we focus on five Hate Speech & Bad Language Scandals. These are: (1) Common use of Swearwords, (2) Gossiping, (3) Insulting followers, (4) Extremism and (5) Racist Slurs. Thereby we analyze the (a) perceived immorality and effects on (b) trust in the influencer, (c) liking of the influencer, (d) following the influencer and (e) purchase intention of the endorsed brand. We pose the following questions: Which scandals have the worst impacts on the influencer and brand? Are there some (minor) scandals that are not hazardous or may even be positive? To answer these questions, we examine and rank the effects of scandals on the influencer and endorsed brands through a survey employing 429 data sets analyzed by variance and cluster analyses in SPSS. In this way, we hierarchize influencer scandals. Some of the results are surprising. For example, even relatively small transgressions, such as the use of swearwords, can have detrimental effects on both the influencer and the brand – nevertheless it is the most minor scandal. Gossiping and insulting followers is of medium seriousness. The most serious scandals are extremism and racist slurs. Overall, a racist slur appears to be the most serious scandal, followed by extremism (except for the variable immorality, where insulting followers is the second worst). Finally, it should be noted that the impacts of the scandals on the five dependent variables were all similar, with differences in details only. At best, the small differences between immorality and the four other dependent variables are noteworthy. For example, immorality is the only variable for which gossiping does not differ significantly from extremism.
KW - Hate speech
KW - Language
KW - Scandal
KW - Social influencer marketing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151257823&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-24687-6_116
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-24687-6_116
M3 - Conference abstract
AN - SCOPUS:85151257823
SN - 978-3-031-24686-9
T3 - Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science
SP - 291
EP - 292
BT - Optimistic Marketing in Challenging Times
PB - Springer Nature
CY - Cham
Y2 - 25 May 2022 through 27 May 2022
ER -