Governmental management by trust communication: German organizational rhetoric in the 2008 financial crisis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Klaus Peter Wiedmann
  • Jan Christoph König
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-45
Number of pages13
JournalOn the Horizon
Volume23
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 9 Feb 2015

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of the authors of this paper is to observe the German Government’s rhetorical communication measurements during the 2008 financial crisis.

Design/methodology/approach – The authors compiled approaches of organizational rhetoric and pragma-linguistics first to offer a consistent concept and method for observation and analysis. Later on, they give an overview of the problem of trust and confidence according to Luhmann’s approach and its meaning for crisis rhetoric and marketing and managing approaches.

Findings – In the following case study, the authors offer a rhetorical text analysis, combined with a pragmatic perspective of accompanying legal measurements of the government as non-verbal communication. The authors show how the government re-established trust among German consumers and eventually overcame the crisis mainly by rhetorical action.

Research limitations/implications – Regarding future crises, the authors suggest that the interaction of trust, financial markets and rhetorical approaches could be better understood. This could include both more quantitative research and qualitative rhetorical approaches.

Practical implications-Practical implications clearly show the importance of rhetorical education, especially for crises. This counts for governmental managers, as well as entrepreneurs and spokesmen.

Social implications – The authors also revealed the problem of unjustified trust which can become dangerous for social welfare, even if it is only produced by misleading communication. This problem can only be solved by a careful public regulation.

Originality/value – Finally, the authors could describe the importance of effective language and communication as a tool for the German Government in the financial crisis in 2008. It can be also described as an example for decision-makers in similar situations.

Keywords

    2008 financial crisis, Consumer confidence, Crisis communication, Governmental marketing and management, Management rhetoric, Organizational rhetoric, Pragma-linguistic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Governmental management by trust communication: German organizational rhetoric in the 2008 financial crisis. / Wiedmann, Klaus Peter; König, Jan Christoph.
In: On the Horizon, Vol. 23, No. 1, 09.02.2015, p. 33-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Wiedmann KP, König JC. Governmental management by trust communication: German organizational rhetoric in the 2008 financial crisis. On the Horizon. 2015 Feb 9;23(1):33-45. doi: 10.1108/OTH-02-2014-0005
Wiedmann, Klaus Peter ; König, Jan Christoph. / Governmental management by trust communication : German organizational rhetoric in the 2008 financial crisis. In: On the Horizon. 2015 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 33-45.
Download
@article{0e42fec890b54b909a780c2d8555101b,
title = "Governmental management by trust communication: German organizational rhetoric in the 2008 financial crisis",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of the authors of this paper is to observe the German Government{\textquoteright}s rhetorical communication measurements during the 2008 financial crisis.Design/methodology/approach – The authors compiled approaches of organizational rhetoric and pragma-linguistics first to offer a consistent concept and method for observation and analysis. Later on, they give an overview of the problem of trust and confidence according to Luhmann{\textquoteright}s approach and its meaning for crisis rhetoric and marketing and managing approaches.Findings – In the following case study, the authors offer a rhetorical text analysis, combined with a pragmatic perspective of accompanying legal measurements of the government as non-verbal communication. The authors show how the government re-established trust among German consumers and eventually overcame the crisis mainly by rhetorical action.Research limitations/implications – Regarding future crises, the authors suggest that the interaction of trust, financial markets and rhetorical approaches could be better understood. This could include both more quantitative research and qualitative rhetorical approaches.Practical implications-Practical implications clearly show the importance of rhetorical education, especially for crises. This counts for governmental managers, as well as entrepreneurs and spokesmen.Social implications – The authors also revealed the problem of unjustified trust which can become dangerous for social welfare, even if it is only produced by misleading communication. This problem can only be solved by a careful public regulation.Originality/value – Finally, the authors could describe the importance of effective language and communication as a tool for the German Government in the financial crisis in 2008. It can be also described as an example for decision-makers in similar situations.",
keywords = "2008 financial crisis, Consumer confidence, Crisis communication, Governmental marketing and management, Management rhetoric, Organizational rhetoric, Pragma-linguistic",
author = "Wiedmann, {Klaus Peter} and K{\"o}nig, {Jan Christoph}",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1108/OTH-02-2014-0005",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "33--45",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governmental management by trust communication

T2 - German organizational rhetoric in the 2008 financial crisis

AU - Wiedmann, Klaus Peter

AU - König, Jan Christoph

PY - 2015/2/9

Y1 - 2015/2/9

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of the authors of this paper is to observe the German Government’s rhetorical communication measurements during the 2008 financial crisis.Design/methodology/approach – The authors compiled approaches of organizational rhetoric and pragma-linguistics first to offer a consistent concept and method for observation and analysis. Later on, they give an overview of the problem of trust and confidence according to Luhmann’s approach and its meaning for crisis rhetoric and marketing and managing approaches.Findings – In the following case study, the authors offer a rhetorical text analysis, combined with a pragmatic perspective of accompanying legal measurements of the government as non-verbal communication. The authors show how the government re-established trust among German consumers and eventually overcame the crisis mainly by rhetorical action.Research limitations/implications – Regarding future crises, the authors suggest that the interaction of trust, financial markets and rhetorical approaches could be better understood. This could include both more quantitative research and qualitative rhetorical approaches.Practical implications-Practical implications clearly show the importance of rhetorical education, especially for crises. This counts for governmental managers, as well as entrepreneurs and spokesmen.Social implications – The authors also revealed the problem of unjustified trust which can become dangerous for social welfare, even if it is only produced by misleading communication. This problem can only be solved by a careful public regulation.Originality/value – Finally, the authors could describe the importance of effective language and communication as a tool for the German Government in the financial crisis in 2008. It can be also described as an example for decision-makers in similar situations.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of the authors of this paper is to observe the German Government’s rhetorical communication measurements during the 2008 financial crisis.Design/methodology/approach – The authors compiled approaches of organizational rhetoric and pragma-linguistics first to offer a consistent concept and method for observation and analysis. Later on, they give an overview of the problem of trust and confidence according to Luhmann’s approach and its meaning for crisis rhetoric and marketing and managing approaches.Findings – In the following case study, the authors offer a rhetorical text analysis, combined with a pragmatic perspective of accompanying legal measurements of the government as non-verbal communication. The authors show how the government re-established trust among German consumers and eventually overcame the crisis mainly by rhetorical action.Research limitations/implications – Regarding future crises, the authors suggest that the interaction of trust, financial markets and rhetorical approaches could be better understood. This could include both more quantitative research and qualitative rhetorical approaches.Practical implications-Practical implications clearly show the importance of rhetorical education, especially for crises. This counts for governmental managers, as well as entrepreneurs and spokesmen.Social implications – The authors also revealed the problem of unjustified trust which can become dangerous for social welfare, even if it is only produced by misleading communication. This problem can only be solved by a careful public regulation.Originality/value – Finally, the authors could describe the importance of effective language and communication as a tool for the German Government in the financial crisis in 2008. It can be also described as an example for decision-makers in similar situations.

KW - 2008 financial crisis

KW - Consumer confidence

KW - Crisis communication

KW - Governmental marketing and management

KW - Management rhetoric

KW - Organizational rhetoric

KW - Pragma-linguistic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922187314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/OTH-02-2014-0005

DO - 10.1108/OTH-02-2014-0005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84922187314

VL - 23

SP - 33

EP - 45

JO - On the Horizon

JF - On the Horizon

SN - 1074-8121

IS - 1

ER -