Good Practice Data Linkage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Stefanie March
  • Silke Andrich
  • Johannes Drepper
  • Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag
  • Andrea Icks
  • Peter Ihle
  • Joachim Kieschke
  • Bianca Kollhorst
  • Birga Maier
  • Ingo Meyer
  • Gabriele Müller
  • Christoph Ohlmeier
  • Dirk Peschke
  • Adrian Richter
  • Marie Luise Rosenbusch
  • Nadine Scholten
  • Mandy Schulz
  • Christoph Stallmann
  • Enno Swart
  • Stefanie Wobbe-Ribinski
  • Antke Wolter
  • Jan Zeidler
  • Falk Hoffmann

External Research Organisations

  • Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
  • Techniker Krankenkasse (TK)
  • University of Cologne
  • Berlin-Brandenburg Myocardial Infarction Registry e. V.
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • IGES Institut GmbH
  • University of Bremen
  • University of Applied Sciences for Health
  • University of Greifswald
  • Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
  • Technology, Methods, and Infrastructure for Networked Medical Research (TMF)
  • Epidemiological Cancer Registry of Lower Saxony
  • Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS
  • Central Research Institute for Ambulatory Healthcare in Germany (Zi)
  • DAK-Gesundheit Zentrale
  • Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
  • German Diabetes Center (DDZ)
View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionGute Praxis Datenlinkage (GPD)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)636-650
Number of pages15
JournalGESUNDHEITSWESEN
Volume81
Issue number8-9
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Aug 2019

Abstract

Individual data linkage of different data sources for research purposes is being increasingly used in Germany in recent years. However, generally accepted methodological guidance is missing. The aim of this article is to define such methodological standards for research projects. Another aim is to provide readers with a checklist for critical appraisal of research proposals and articles. Since 2016, an expert panel of members of different German scientific societies have worked together and developed 7 guidelines with a total of 27 practical recommendations. These recommendations include (1) research aims, questions, data sources and resources, (2) infrastructure and data flow, (3) data privacy, (4) ethics, (5) key variables and type of linkage, (6) data validation/quality assurance and (7) long-term use for future research questions. The authors provide a rationale for each recommendation. Future revisions will include any new developments in science and data privacy.

Keywords

    epidemiology, guidelines, health services research, personal data, record linkage, standard

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Good Practice Data Linkage. / March, Stefanie; Andrich, Silke; Drepper, Johannes et al.
In: GESUNDHEITSWESEN, Vol. 81, No. 8-9, 08.08.2019, p. 636-650.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

March, S, Andrich, S, Drepper, J, Horenkamp-Sonntag, D, Icks, A, Ihle, P, Kieschke, J, Kollhorst, B, Maier, B, Meyer, I, Müller, G, Ohlmeier, C, Peschke, D, Richter, A, Rosenbusch, ML, Scholten, N, Schulz, M, Stallmann, C, Swart, E, Wobbe-Ribinski, S, Wolter, A, Zeidler, J & Hoffmann, F 2019, 'Good Practice Data Linkage', GESUNDHEITSWESEN, vol. 81, no. 8-9, pp. 636-650. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0962-9933
March, S., Andrich, S., Drepper, J., Horenkamp-Sonntag, D., Icks, A., Ihle, P., Kieschke, J., Kollhorst, B., Maier, B., Meyer, I., Müller, G., Ohlmeier, C., Peschke, D., Richter, A., Rosenbusch, M. L., Scholten, N., Schulz, M., Stallmann, C., Swart, E., ... Hoffmann, F. (2019). Good Practice Data Linkage. GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 81(8-9), 636-650. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0962-9933
March S, Andrich S, Drepper J, Horenkamp-Sonntag D, Icks A, Ihle P et al. Good Practice Data Linkage. GESUNDHEITSWESEN. 2019 Aug 8;81(8-9):636-650. Epub 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1055/a-0962-9933
March, Stefanie ; Andrich, Silke ; Drepper, Johannes et al. / Good Practice Data Linkage. In: GESUNDHEITSWESEN. 2019 ; Vol. 81, No. 8-9. pp. 636-650.
Download
@article{ba16954a6710415db74c630cf0f2207a,
title = "Good Practice Data Linkage",
abstract = "Individual data linkage of different data sources for research purposes is being increasingly used in Germany in recent years. However, generally accepted methodological guidance is missing. The aim of this article is to define such methodological standards for research projects. Another aim is to provide readers with a checklist for critical appraisal of research proposals and articles. Since 2016, an expert panel of members of different German scientific societies have worked together and developed 7 guidelines with a total of 27 practical recommendations. These recommendations include (1) research aims, questions, data sources and resources, (2) infrastructure and data flow, (3) data privacy, (4) ethics, (5) key variables and type of linkage, (6) data validation/quality assurance and (7) long-term use for future research questions. The authors provide a rationale for each recommendation. Future revisions will include any new developments in science and data privacy.",
keywords = "epidemiology, guidelines, health services research, personal data, record linkage, standard",
author = "Stefanie March and Silke Andrich and Johannes Drepper and Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag and Andrea Icks and Peter Ihle and Joachim Kieschke and Bianca Kollhorst and Birga Maier and Ingo Meyer and Gabriele M{\"u}ller and Christoph Ohlmeier and Dirk Peschke and Adrian Richter and Rosenbusch, {Marie Luise} and Nadine Scholten and Mandy Schulz and Christoph Stallmann and Enno Swart and Stefanie Wobbe-Ribinski and Antke Wolter and Jan Zeidler and Falk Hoffmann",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
day = "8",
doi = "10.1055/a-0962-9933",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "636--650",
journal = "GESUNDHEITSWESEN",
issn = "0941-3790",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "8-9",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Good Practice Data Linkage

AU - March, Stefanie

AU - Andrich, Silke

AU - Drepper, Johannes

AU - Horenkamp-Sonntag, Dirk

AU - Icks, Andrea

AU - Ihle, Peter

AU - Kieschke, Joachim

AU - Kollhorst, Bianca

AU - Maier, Birga

AU - Meyer, Ingo

AU - Müller, Gabriele

AU - Ohlmeier, Christoph

AU - Peschke, Dirk

AU - Richter, Adrian

AU - Rosenbusch, Marie Luise

AU - Scholten, Nadine

AU - Schulz, Mandy

AU - Stallmann, Christoph

AU - Swart, Enno

AU - Wobbe-Ribinski, Stefanie

AU - Wolter, Antke

AU - Zeidler, Jan

AU - Hoffmann, Falk

PY - 2019/8/8

Y1 - 2019/8/8

N2 - Individual data linkage of different data sources for research purposes is being increasingly used in Germany in recent years. However, generally accepted methodological guidance is missing. The aim of this article is to define such methodological standards for research projects. Another aim is to provide readers with a checklist for critical appraisal of research proposals and articles. Since 2016, an expert panel of members of different German scientific societies have worked together and developed 7 guidelines with a total of 27 practical recommendations. These recommendations include (1) research aims, questions, data sources and resources, (2) infrastructure and data flow, (3) data privacy, (4) ethics, (5) key variables and type of linkage, (6) data validation/quality assurance and (7) long-term use for future research questions. The authors provide a rationale for each recommendation. Future revisions will include any new developments in science and data privacy.

AB - Individual data linkage of different data sources for research purposes is being increasingly used in Germany in recent years. However, generally accepted methodological guidance is missing. The aim of this article is to define such methodological standards for research projects. Another aim is to provide readers with a checklist for critical appraisal of research proposals and articles. Since 2016, an expert panel of members of different German scientific societies have worked together and developed 7 guidelines with a total of 27 practical recommendations. These recommendations include (1) research aims, questions, data sources and resources, (2) infrastructure and data flow, (3) data privacy, (4) ethics, (5) key variables and type of linkage, (6) data validation/quality assurance and (7) long-term use for future research questions. The authors provide a rationale for each recommendation. Future revisions will include any new developments in science and data privacy.

KW - epidemiology

KW - guidelines

KW - health services research

KW - personal data

KW - record linkage

KW - standard

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071309443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/a-0962-9933

DO - 10.1055/a-0962-9933

M3 - Article

C2 - 31394579

AN - SCOPUS:85071309443

VL - 81

SP - 636

EP - 650

JO - GESUNDHEITSWESEN

JF - GESUNDHEITSWESEN

SN - 0941-3790

IS - 8-9

ER -