Global soil organic carbon–climate interactions: Why scales matter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Hermann F. Jungkunst
  • Jan Göpel
  • Thomas Horvath
  • Simone Ott
  • Melanie Brunn

External Research Organisations

  • University of Koblenz-Landau
  • California State University Monterey Bay
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere780
JournalWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
Volume13
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jun 2022

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) holds the largest terrestrial carbon stock because of soil conditions and processes that favor soil carbon persistence. Vulnerable to climate change, SOC may cross a tipping point toward liberating carbon-based greenhouse gases, implying massive self-amplifying SOC- climate interactions. Estimates of SOC persistence are challenging as we still lack broad mechanistic insights. Upscaling mechanistic details from small to larger scales is challenging because the driving factors are not available at the needed resolution. Downscaling is problematic as many modeling studies point to the highest uncertainties deriving from the SOC response to climate change, while models themselves have difficulties in replicating contemporary soil properties and dynamics. To bridge the problems of scaling, strict process orientation seems adequate. Holdridge Life Zones (HLZ) classification, as one example, is a climate classification framework at a mesoscale that provides a descriptive approach to facilitate the identification of potential hotspots and coldspots of SOC-climate interaction. Establishing coordinated experiments across all HLZ, but also including multiple global change drivers, has the potential to advance our understanding of general principles regulating SOC-climate interaction and SOC persistence. Therefore, regionally tailored solutions for both experiments and modeling are urgently needed and can lead to better management of soil and the ecosystem services provided. Improving “translations” from the scales relevant for process understanding to the scales of decision-making is key to good management and to predict the fate of our largest terrestrial carbon stock. This article is categorized under: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Integrated Scenario Development.

Keywords

    critical mesoscale, ESM, regional perspectives, soil carbon persistence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Global soil organic carbon–climate interactions: Why scales matter. / Jungkunst, Hermann F.; Göpel, Jan; Horvath, Thomas et al.
In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 13, No. 4, e780, 14.06.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Jungkunst HF, Göpel J, Horvath T, Ott S, Brunn M. Global soil organic carbon–climate interactions: Why scales matter. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2022 Jun 14;13(4):e780. doi: 10.1002/wcc.780
Jungkunst, Hermann F. ; Göpel, Jan ; Horvath, Thomas et al. / Global soil organic carbon–climate interactions: Why scales matter. In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2022 ; Vol. 13, No. 4.
Download
@article{0f95c7125a834d41a5d82e7eaba191fb,
title = "Global soil organic carbon–climate interactions: Why scales matter",
abstract = "Soil organic carbon (SOC) holds the largest terrestrial carbon stock because of soil conditions and processes that favor soil carbon persistence. Vulnerable to climate change, SOC may cross a tipping point toward liberating carbon-based greenhouse gases, implying massive self-amplifying SOC- climate interactions. Estimates of SOC persistence are challenging as we still lack broad mechanistic insights. Upscaling mechanistic details from small to larger scales is challenging because the driving factors are not available at the needed resolution. Downscaling is problematic as many modeling studies point to the highest uncertainties deriving from the SOC response to climate change, while models themselves have difficulties in replicating contemporary soil properties and dynamics. To bridge the problems of scaling, strict process orientation seems adequate. Holdridge Life Zones (HLZ) classification, as one example, is a climate classification framework at a mesoscale that provides a descriptive approach to facilitate the identification of potential hotspots and coldspots of SOC-climate interaction. Establishing coordinated experiments across all HLZ, but also including multiple global change drivers, has the potential to advance our understanding of general principles regulating SOC-climate interaction and SOC persistence. Therefore, regionally tailored solutions for both experiments and modeling are urgently needed and can lead to better management of soil and the ecosystem services provided. Improving “translations” from the scales relevant for process understanding to the scales of decision-making is key to good management and to predict the fate of our largest terrestrial carbon stock. This article is categorized under: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Integrated Scenario Development.",
keywords = "critical mesoscale, ESM, regional perspectives, soil carbon persistence",
author = "Jungkunst, {Hermann F.} and Jan G{\"o}pel and Thomas Horvath and Simone Ott and Melanie Brunn",
note = "Funding Information: We thank our home institutes for providing the overhead support for this collaborative work. We also acknowledge the contributions of the broadest scientific community for continuously improving both experimental and modeling approaches to better understanding the role of soils under climate change, and the interest of society in using science to inform decisions that affect humanity as a whole. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1002/wcc.780",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change",
issn = "1757-7780",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global soil organic carbon–climate interactions: Why scales matter

AU - Jungkunst, Hermann F.

AU - Göpel, Jan

AU - Horvath, Thomas

AU - Ott, Simone

AU - Brunn, Melanie

N1 - Funding Information: We thank our home institutes for providing the overhead support for this collaborative work. We also acknowledge the contributions of the broadest scientific community for continuously improving both experimental and modeling approaches to better understanding the role of soils under climate change, and the interest of society in using science to inform decisions that affect humanity as a whole. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

PY - 2022/6/14

Y1 - 2022/6/14

N2 - Soil organic carbon (SOC) holds the largest terrestrial carbon stock because of soil conditions and processes that favor soil carbon persistence. Vulnerable to climate change, SOC may cross a tipping point toward liberating carbon-based greenhouse gases, implying massive self-amplifying SOC- climate interactions. Estimates of SOC persistence are challenging as we still lack broad mechanistic insights. Upscaling mechanistic details from small to larger scales is challenging because the driving factors are not available at the needed resolution. Downscaling is problematic as many modeling studies point to the highest uncertainties deriving from the SOC response to climate change, while models themselves have difficulties in replicating contemporary soil properties and dynamics. To bridge the problems of scaling, strict process orientation seems adequate. Holdridge Life Zones (HLZ) classification, as one example, is a climate classification framework at a mesoscale that provides a descriptive approach to facilitate the identification of potential hotspots and coldspots of SOC-climate interaction. Establishing coordinated experiments across all HLZ, but also including multiple global change drivers, has the potential to advance our understanding of general principles regulating SOC-climate interaction and SOC persistence. Therefore, regionally tailored solutions for both experiments and modeling are urgently needed and can lead to better management of soil and the ecosystem services provided. Improving “translations” from the scales relevant for process understanding to the scales of decision-making is key to good management and to predict the fate of our largest terrestrial carbon stock. This article is categorized under: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Integrated Scenario Development.

AB - Soil organic carbon (SOC) holds the largest terrestrial carbon stock because of soil conditions and processes that favor soil carbon persistence. Vulnerable to climate change, SOC may cross a tipping point toward liberating carbon-based greenhouse gases, implying massive self-amplifying SOC- climate interactions. Estimates of SOC persistence are challenging as we still lack broad mechanistic insights. Upscaling mechanistic details from small to larger scales is challenging because the driving factors are not available at the needed resolution. Downscaling is problematic as many modeling studies point to the highest uncertainties deriving from the SOC response to climate change, while models themselves have difficulties in replicating contemporary soil properties and dynamics. To bridge the problems of scaling, strict process orientation seems adequate. Holdridge Life Zones (HLZ) classification, as one example, is a climate classification framework at a mesoscale that provides a descriptive approach to facilitate the identification of potential hotspots and coldspots of SOC-climate interaction. Establishing coordinated experiments across all HLZ, but also including multiple global change drivers, has the potential to advance our understanding of general principles regulating SOC-climate interaction and SOC persistence. Therefore, regionally tailored solutions for both experiments and modeling are urgently needed and can lead to better management of soil and the ecosystem services provided. Improving “translations” from the scales relevant for process understanding to the scales of decision-making is key to good management and to predict the fate of our largest terrestrial carbon stock. This article is categorized under: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Integrated Scenario Development.

KW - critical mesoscale

KW - ESM

KW - regional perspectives

KW - soil carbon persistence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131415012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/wcc.780

DO - 10.1002/wcc.780

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

JF - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

SN - 1757-7780

IS - 4

M1 - e780

ER -

By the same author(s)