Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 102993 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | NDT and E International |
| Volume | 141 |
| Early online date | 10 Nov 2023 |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2024 |
Abstract
Non-destructive testing techniques, such as ultrasonic testing and acoustic emission analysis, commonly employ piezoelectric sensors for monitoring and detecting defects in structures. The quality of data acquired using these sensors is highly dependent on the coupling layer between the transducer and the structure's surface. In this context, this study compares the signal response of four different couplant materials, namely acrylic adhesive pads, honey, vaseline, and hot glue, applied to a steel surface. For this purpose, experiments were conducted using a laser Doppler vibrometer and acoustic emission analysis to investigate the signal transmission of the couplant materials and their impact on the signal response of a coupled piezoelectric sensor VS30-V. The repeatability of the experiments was statistically analyzed. The findings indicate that acoustic emission measurements with acrylic adhesive pads exhibited the lowest relative standard deviation of 11.4%, followed by honey (13.2%), hot glue (21.9%), and vaseline (32.1%). The investigated couplant materials exhibited different effects on the signal response of the piezoelectric sensor. Specifically, acrylic adhesive pads and hot glue demonstrated more reliable signal transmission in the frequency range of 50 kHz to 65 kHz. In contrast, honey and vaseline had better performance within the frequency range of 65 kHz and 80 kHz. Considering the frequency-dependent characteristics of signal transmission and the ease of application, acrylic adhesive pads and honey are considered the preferred couplant materials for the frequency ranges of 50 kHz to 65 kHz and 65 kHz to 80 kHz, respectively.
Keywords
- Acoustic emission (AE), Couplant material, Laser Doppler vibrometer, Non-destructive testing (NDT), Signal transmission
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Materials Science(all)
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Engineering(all)
- Mechanical Engineering
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: NDT and E International, Vol. 141, 102993, 01.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Frequency dependent amplitude response of different couplant materials for mounting piezoelectric sensors
AU - Xu, Ronghua
AU - Beltrán-Gutiérrez, Raúl Enrique
AU - Käding, Max
AU - Lange, Alexander
AU - Marx, Steffen
AU - Ostermann, Jörn
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) [grant numbers: 03EE2025A ].
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Non-destructive testing techniques, such as ultrasonic testing and acoustic emission analysis, commonly employ piezoelectric sensors for monitoring and detecting defects in structures. The quality of data acquired using these sensors is highly dependent on the coupling layer between the transducer and the structure's surface. In this context, this study compares the signal response of four different couplant materials, namely acrylic adhesive pads, honey, vaseline, and hot glue, applied to a steel surface. For this purpose, experiments were conducted using a laser Doppler vibrometer and acoustic emission analysis to investigate the signal transmission of the couplant materials and their impact on the signal response of a coupled piezoelectric sensor VS30-V. The repeatability of the experiments was statistically analyzed. The findings indicate that acoustic emission measurements with acrylic adhesive pads exhibited the lowest relative standard deviation of 11.4%, followed by honey (13.2%), hot glue (21.9%), and vaseline (32.1%). The investigated couplant materials exhibited different effects on the signal response of the piezoelectric sensor. Specifically, acrylic adhesive pads and hot glue demonstrated more reliable signal transmission in the frequency range of 50 kHz to 65 kHz. In contrast, honey and vaseline had better performance within the frequency range of 65 kHz and 80 kHz. Considering the frequency-dependent characteristics of signal transmission and the ease of application, acrylic adhesive pads and honey are considered the preferred couplant materials for the frequency ranges of 50 kHz to 65 kHz and 65 kHz to 80 kHz, respectively.
AB - Non-destructive testing techniques, such as ultrasonic testing and acoustic emission analysis, commonly employ piezoelectric sensors for monitoring and detecting defects in structures. The quality of data acquired using these sensors is highly dependent on the coupling layer between the transducer and the structure's surface. In this context, this study compares the signal response of four different couplant materials, namely acrylic adhesive pads, honey, vaseline, and hot glue, applied to a steel surface. For this purpose, experiments were conducted using a laser Doppler vibrometer and acoustic emission analysis to investigate the signal transmission of the couplant materials and their impact on the signal response of a coupled piezoelectric sensor VS30-V. The repeatability of the experiments was statistically analyzed. The findings indicate that acoustic emission measurements with acrylic adhesive pads exhibited the lowest relative standard deviation of 11.4%, followed by honey (13.2%), hot glue (21.9%), and vaseline (32.1%). The investigated couplant materials exhibited different effects on the signal response of the piezoelectric sensor. Specifically, acrylic adhesive pads and hot glue demonstrated more reliable signal transmission in the frequency range of 50 kHz to 65 kHz. In contrast, honey and vaseline had better performance within the frequency range of 65 kHz and 80 kHz. Considering the frequency-dependent characteristics of signal transmission and the ease of application, acrylic adhesive pads and honey are considered the preferred couplant materials for the frequency ranges of 50 kHz to 65 kHz and 65 kHz to 80 kHz, respectively.
KW - Acoustic emission (AE)
KW - Couplant material
KW - Laser Doppler vibrometer
KW - Non-destructive testing (NDT)
KW - Signal transmission
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176449882&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102993
DO - 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102993
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85176449882
VL - 141
JO - NDT and E International
JF - NDT and E International
SN - 0963-8695
M1 - 102993
ER -