Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 145-154 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Ecological indicators |
| Volume | 21 |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Abstract
Ecosystem service assessments (ESA) hold the promise of supporting the quantification and valuation of human appropriation of nature and its goods and services. The concept has taken flight with the number of studies published on the topic increasing rapidly. This development, and the variation of diverging approaches, support innovative ideas and may lead to complementary insights from various perspectives. However, at the same time this slows scientific synthesis through increasing uncertainty with respect to the appropriate methodologies to be used to support solving environmental management problems. We analyzed ESA and the underlying concepts based on the variety of available publications and reviews, which revealed a number of different methods, uncertain reliability and robustness. In order to facilitate comparison, evaluation and synthesis of ecosystem service assessments we propose a blueprint for reporting studies in a structured way. By exemplifying this with worked examples, we argue that the use of such a blueprint will (i) assist in achieving improved communication and collaboration in transdisciplinary teams; (ii) reveal methodological aspects, important for the interpretation of results; (iii) support robustness and reliability of assessments; (iv) aid in structuring assessment studies and monitoring programs; (v) provide a base for comparing and synthesizing results of different studies (e.g. in meta-analysis), and thus (vi) provide a base for further implementation of ESA.
Keywords
- Ecosystem services, Environmental assessment, Environmental management, Meta-data
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Decision Sciences(all)
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Environmental Science(all)
- Ecology
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Ecological indicators, Vol. 21, 10.2012, p. 145-154.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies
AU - Seppelt, Ralf
AU - Fath, Brian
AU - Burkhard, Benjamin
AU - Fisher, Judy L.
AU - Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne
AU - Lautenbach, Sven
AU - Pert, Petina
AU - Hotes, Stefan
AU - Spangenberg, Joachim
AU - Verburg, Peter H.
AU - Van Oudenhoven, Alexander P.E.
N1 - Funding Information: The work was funded by grant 01LL0901A ( German Ministry of Research and Technology ), the Helmholtz Programme “Terrestrial Environmental Research” ( Seppelt et al., 2009 ). Special thanks are due to the participants of the Workshop on Ecosystem Services, Kohren-Salis, Germany in 2009 organized by Carsten F. Dorman as well as all participants of the Workshops at the Ecosystem Service Conference at Salzau Castle in 2010. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/10
Y1 - 2012/10
N2 - Ecosystem service assessments (ESA) hold the promise of supporting the quantification and valuation of human appropriation of nature and its goods and services. The concept has taken flight with the number of studies published on the topic increasing rapidly. This development, and the variation of diverging approaches, support innovative ideas and may lead to complementary insights from various perspectives. However, at the same time this slows scientific synthesis through increasing uncertainty with respect to the appropriate methodologies to be used to support solving environmental management problems. We analyzed ESA and the underlying concepts based on the variety of available publications and reviews, which revealed a number of different methods, uncertain reliability and robustness. In order to facilitate comparison, evaluation and synthesis of ecosystem service assessments we propose a blueprint for reporting studies in a structured way. By exemplifying this with worked examples, we argue that the use of such a blueprint will (i) assist in achieving improved communication and collaboration in transdisciplinary teams; (ii) reveal methodological aspects, important for the interpretation of results; (iii) support robustness and reliability of assessments; (iv) aid in structuring assessment studies and monitoring programs; (v) provide a base for comparing and synthesizing results of different studies (e.g. in meta-analysis), and thus (vi) provide a base for further implementation of ESA.
AB - Ecosystem service assessments (ESA) hold the promise of supporting the quantification and valuation of human appropriation of nature and its goods and services. The concept has taken flight with the number of studies published on the topic increasing rapidly. This development, and the variation of diverging approaches, support innovative ideas and may lead to complementary insights from various perspectives. However, at the same time this slows scientific synthesis through increasing uncertainty with respect to the appropriate methodologies to be used to support solving environmental management problems. We analyzed ESA and the underlying concepts based on the variety of available publications and reviews, which revealed a number of different methods, uncertain reliability and robustness. In order to facilitate comparison, evaluation and synthesis of ecosystem service assessments we propose a blueprint for reporting studies in a structured way. By exemplifying this with worked examples, we argue that the use of such a blueprint will (i) assist in achieving improved communication and collaboration in transdisciplinary teams; (ii) reveal methodological aspects, important for the interpretation of results; (iii) support robustness and reliability of assessments; (iv) aid in structuring assessment studies and monitoring programs; (v) provide a base for comparing and synthesizing results of different studies (e.g. in meta-analysis), and thus (vi) provide a base for further implementation of ESA.
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Environmental assessment
KW - Environmental management
KW - Meta-data
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860290466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84860290466
VL - 21
SP - 145
EP - 154
JO - Ecological indicators
JF - Ecological indicators
SN - 1470-160X
ER -